Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Oct 2011 (Tuesday) 22:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

De-fishing a fisheye

 
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Oct 18, 2011 22:28 |  #1

Does anyone here have experience with de-fishing a diagonal fisheye on a 5D2?

After cropping to a rectangle, how large an image are you left with? What aspect ratio is the image? And how wide is the remaining image?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 18, 2011 22:34 |  #2

I've played with doing it in DxO and PTLens. I have a 5D and a Canon 15mm FE. If you completely de-fish an image, it looks like crap in my opinion unless you crop it so heavily you may as well have just used a much longer lens to begin with. Some light de-fishing can work nicely though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Oct 18, 2011 23:57 |  #3

For most landscape uses, I'd just need to correct the horizontals, not the verticals.

What do you mean it 'looks like crap' - do you mean too much of a loss of resolution, or too much distortion?

When you de-fish and crop to a rectangle, you'd end up with an aspect ratio much wider than 3:2 - more akin to a panorama.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 19, 2011 01:43 |  #4

The more you de-fish it, the more stretched the corners get and corners aren't that great to begin with on the 15mm. I use my fisheye as a fisheye and have the 17-40 when I want lines to stay straight. I've done some landscape with the fisheye and depending on composition, it doesn't necessarily look like an obvious fisheye shot as long as I keep the horizon through the middle and there's nothing like a fence post near the edge.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rusty.jg
Senior Member
855 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Cornwall, UK
     
Oct 19, 2011 04:32 as a reply to  @ mike_d's post |  #5

I imagine that picture quality will suffer quite a bit. I have the Samyang 14mm (not a fisheye) and occasionally when I try to correct perspective distortion the sharpness of the image degrades quickly - the correction needed on a fisheye would be even greater.

You could try stitching two UWA images together if you wanted a more normal looking image taken over a wide field of view?


to be OR NOT to be = 1 (which is "to be" so that one's cleared up at last ;-)a)
www.VividCornwall.co.u​k (external link) (external link)
Sony Nex-5n (x2) / Metabones EF-NEX Smart Adapter / Canon 10-22mm / Canon 100mm Macro / Sigma 18-50mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,806 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 401
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Oct 19, 2011 04:33 |  #6

rusty.jg wrote in post #13272341 (external link)
I imagine that picture quality will suffer quite a bit. I have the Samyang 14mm (not a fisheye) and occasionally when I try to correct perspective distortion the sharpness of the image degrades quickly - the correction needed on a fisheye would be even greater.

You could try stitching two UWA images together if you wanted a more normal looking image taken over a wide field of view?

I do a fair bit of stitching already.

This is for times where stitching isn't practical.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,976 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
De-fishing a fisheye
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
671 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.