Does anyone here have experience with de-fishing a diagonal fisheye on a 5D2?
After cropping to a rectangle, how large an image are you left with? What aspect ratio is the image? And how wide is the remaining image?
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Oct 18, 2011 22:28 | #1 Does anyone here have experience with de-fishing a diagonal fisheye on a 5D2?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 18, 2011 22:34 | #2 I've played with doing it in DxO and PTLens. I have a 5D and a Canon 15mm FE. If you completely de-fish an image, it looks like crap in my opinion unless you crop it so heavily you may as well have just used a much longer lens to begin with. Some light de-fishing can work nicely though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 18, 2011 23:57 | #3 For most landscape uses, I'd just need to correct the horizontals, not the verticals.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 19, 2011 01:43 | #4 The more you de-fish it, the more stretched the corners get and corners aren't that great to begin with on the 15mm. I use my fisheye as a fisheye and have the 17-40 when I want lines to stay straight. I've done some landscape with the fisheye and depending on composition, it doesn't necessarily look like an obvious fisheye shot as long as I keep the horizon through the middle and there's nothing like a fence post near the edge.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rusty.jg Senior Member 855 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cornwall, UK More info | I imagine that picture quality will suffer quite a bit. I have the Samyang 14mm (not a fisheye) and occasionally when I try to correct perspective distortion the sharpness of the image degrades quickly - the correction needed on a fisheye would be even greater. to be OR NOT to be = 1 (which is "to be" so that one's cleared up at last
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 19, 2011 04:33 | #6 rusty.jg wrote in post #13272341 I imagine that picture quality will suffer quite a bit. I have the Samyang 14mm (not a fisheye) and occasionally when I try to correct perspective distortion the sharpness of the image degrades quickly - the correction needed on a fisheye would be even greater. You could try stitching two UWA images together if you wanted a more normal looking image taken over a wide field of view? I do a fair bit of stitching already.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 671 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||