Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 19 Oct 2011 (Wednesday) 23:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Senior Pictures -- Critique please.

 
st3venb
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Mesa, Az.
     
Oct 19, 2011 23:18 |  #1

I was walking around at Tempe Town Lake and ran across a couple of girls taking pictures of each other with a point and shoot. I was taking some pics of the bridges there, and we started talking... they were doing their own little senior portraits with a point and shoot, cause they couldn't afford to get actual senior portraits done.

I offered to take some pictures for them, with no expectation of charge unless they liked them... and then all they had to do was refer friends to me so that I could continue developing my portfolio an getting experience.

So without further ado, here are my favorites of our impromptu session:

#1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


#2
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


#3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


#4
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


#5
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


#6
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


#7
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.
my humble sites:
{flickr (external link) } { seeingflashes.com (external link) }

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanZ
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
     
Oct 19, 2011 23:31 |  #2

#2, 3, 4 and 5 are out of focus. Compositions are good. They would be better if you used a flash gun.


7D | Speedlite 430EX II x 3 + PixelKing | 70-200 f/2.8 II | 24-70 f2.8L | 50mm 1.8
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/alanzhaonys (external link)
500px: http://alanzhao.500px.​com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
st3venb
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Mesa, Az.
     
Oct 19, 2011 23:35 |  #3

AlanZ wrote in post #13277273 (external link)
#2, 3, 4 and 5 are out of focus. Compositions are good. They would be better if you used a flash gun.

Yeah, I'm having a hard time with my 50mm and the T2i's autofocus system. And yes, I would have loved to have a flash gun, or even a flash... but I was using what I had... my camera, the nifty fifty and some random ideas.


Thanks for the comment about the compositions, I sort of feel cheesy sometimes with my ideas. I'm glad that these worked.


Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.
my humble sites:
{flickr (external link) } { seeingflashes.com (external link) }

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanZ
Senior Member
297 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2011
     
Oct 19, 2011 23:40 |  #4

I also suggest you use a single focus point(if you're not already) - focus on the eyes and recompose. I used to have lots of out of focus portrait shots, now most of my family photos are dead on the focus.


7D | Speedlite 430EX II x 3 + PixelKing | 70-200 f/2.8 II | 24-70 f2.8L | 50mm 1.8
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/alanzhaonys (external link)
500px: http://alanzhao.500px.​com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cruleworld
Senior Member
Avatar
330 posts
Joined Apr 2011
     
Oct 19, 2011 23:50 |  #5

I'd say your main thing to work on is Focus. But picture number one seems to me that the subject is underexposed. Also the background in #2 is distracting. The light in picture #5 is distracting as it is the brightest thing in the picture.


JOSH SORENSON|MY SITE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Apr 2010
Location: West Melbourne, Fl
     
Oct 20, 2011 08:34 as a reply to  @ cruleworld's post |  #6

2, 3 and 6 are the best of the bunch. Even with the background #2 is still pretty good. Adding some fill light to #1 should help it quite a bit and make it a decent shot. You might want to crop some of the blown sky in #2 out of the picture to help it.


Flickr (external link)
Sony A6500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
st3venb
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Mesa, Az.
     
Oct 20, 2011 09:19 |  #7

Thanks. ;) I guess I need to go center point AF and decompose like others have stated.

Gonna try those edits.


Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.
my humble sites:
{flickr (external link) } { seeingflashes.com (external link) }

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
winters19
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2010
Location: Pierceton, Indiana
     
Oct 20, 2011 09:29 |  #8

Not bad. Play with the pop up flash. It's not as useless as others claim it to be....


Canon 7D -Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC- -Canon 28mm F2.8- -Canon 50mm F1.8-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frankxsi
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 20, 2011 13:28 |  #9

this is interesting...your webpage is seeingflashes.com BUT I don't see any LOL




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Oct 20, 2011 13:44 |  #10

Playing around with the first image and ran the exposure up to correct the girl. It blows out the background but gives an interesting image that I think is more appealing than the underexposed version.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gregr2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,468 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 202
Joined Apr 2010
Location: West Melbourne, Fl
     
Oct 20, 2011 13:57 as a reply to  @ Titus213's post |  #11

A quick edit on one:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Flickr (external link)
Sony A6500

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 20, 2011 14:01 |  #12

Don't use these in your portfolio and don't let the girls see them. It'll do more harm than good. No offense but this is the stuff that turns people off rather than on. They were probably getting better results with their point & shoots due to more inherent DoF and knowing each other on a more personal level.

Don't give up, just toss these and try again. Some of the poses do work, but your exposures and focus is all over the place. The lighting (particularly #1) isn't good at all. She's heavily backlit with nothing filling in from the front. Lacking a flash gun, what you want to do is keep the sky out of the frame and let the background go as bright as necessary to have her eyes exposed properly.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
st3venb
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Mesa, Az.
     
Oct 20, 2011 14:28 |  #13

cdifoto wrote in post #13280212 (external link)
Don't use these in your portfolio and don't let the girls see them. It'll do more harm than good. No offense but this is the stuff that turns people off rather than on. They were probably getting better results with their point & shoots due to more inherent DoF and knowing each other on a more personal level.

Don't give up, just toss these and try again. Some of the poses do work, but your exposures and focus is all over the place. The lighting (particularly #1) isn't good at all. She's heavily backlit with nothing filling in from the front. Lacking a flash gun, what you want to do is keep the sky out of the frame and let the background go as bright as necessary to have her eyes exposed properly.

Your opinion is that none of those are keepers?


Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.
my humble sites:
{flickr (external link) } { seeingflashes.com (external link) }

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 20, 2011 14:44 |  #14

st3venb wrote in post #13280334 (external link)
Your opinion is that none of those are keepers?

#1 and #6 might be salvageable. The last one is unflattering (square to the camera = not good) and the rest are completely out of focus.

Being totally new, it might be worth keeping 1 and 6 so you have something but the rest - definitely not.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
st3venb
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Mesa, Az.
     
Oct 20, 2011 14:49 |  #15

cdifoto wrote in post #13280415 (external link)
#1 and #6 might be salvageable. The last one is unflattering (square to the camera = not good) and the rest are completely out of focus.

Being totally new, it might be worth keeping 1 and 6 so you have something but the rest - definitely not.

Thank you.


I'm really frustrated with the AF system on my t2i, it seems as though I should go back to centerpoint and recompose a lot.

Anyone have tips for making the AF work better for you during these types of shots, so there is less shuffling / recomposing to work around a camera that can't reliably find focus?


Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.
my humble sites:
{flickr (external link) } { seeingflashes.com (external link) }

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,044 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Senior Pictures -- Critique please.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
946 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.