Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Oct 2011 (Thursday) 04:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best camera kit I can get with $2000?

 
sourlemons
Member
34 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 20, 2011 04:47 |  #1

Hey guys! I had previously made up a list of what I would be purchasing for my camera but then the new iPhone came out (arrgh!) and I decided that I really really wanted it (haven't got it yet) and then I decided more stuff .. and so that drops my budget for new gear down to roughly $2000.

So, what do you guys think would be the best kit I could get?

I previously had in mind the
Canon 60d
Canon 17-55mm/Tamron 17-50mm
Canon 70-200mm f4 non-is
Canon 50mm 1.8 II
Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro (If I had enough)
Canon 430EX II

So.. What do you think I could get most similarly to that^?

Thanks in advance :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxchoi
Goldmember
1,146 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 20, 2011 05:24 |  #2

I've got a kit that's pretty similar. I don't think you can go wrong with that setup.

Tamron 17-50 is an easy way to save a ton of money without much compromise.

60D + Tamron 17-50 + 70-200 should get you right around $2000 and have you pretty well covered.


Patrick Choi
Portfolio (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)
EOS 7D | 580EX II | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5 | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS |70-200mm f/2.8L IS II
For Sale: 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 10-22mm f3.5-f4.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertro
Member
44 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Oct 20, 2011 06:11 |  #3

It all depends on what you want to shoot. Is size, weight more important, or are you willing to lug around big glass? Do you do portraits or landscapes? etc...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Oct 20, 2011 06:17 |  #4

Not sure how close it comes, but I think pretty close. I would start with this?

Canon 60d
Canon 17-55mm
Canon 430EX II


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TweakMDS
Goldmember
Avatar
2,242 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Oct 20, 2011 07:07 |  #5

Fortunately a budget is something that grows over time, especially in photography. I'd start off with the above suggestion of 60D + 17-55 and either a 430EXII or save up another month or two and get a 70-200, depending on whether or not your style of shooting involves a flash.
I'd really recommend a flash though. A fast lens and bounced flash combined gives great results indoor.

Edit: I just looked it up, but without any kit deals at adorama, a 60D + 17-55 is already $ 2008. You'd have to stretch it a few bucks for a second battery and CF card(s). Still, great kit to start off with I suppose.


Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
~Michael
Gear | Flickr (external link)
"My featured shots" (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
riotshield
Senior Member
425 posts
Joined Apr 2011
     
Oct 20, 2011 07:49 as a reply to  @ TweakMDS's post |  #6

I had a similar budget after selling my Nikon gear and this is what I got:

60D - refurbished from Canon Loyalty Program, traded in a broken P&S - ~$680
Tamron 17-50 - new grey market from Japan, bought from Sanpou Camera on eBay - $340
Tamron 60 macro - found one on closeout at 6th Ave Electronics, plus $100 rebate - $340
Sigma 10-20 - on sale at Abes of Maine $420 with coupons
Yongnuo YN-565EX flash from thephotogadget $155

That adds up to roughly $2K, plus a little extra for accessories. As the budget allows I may add an inexpensive telephoto (probably the Canon 55-250) later




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Oct 20, 2011 07:52 |  #7

replace the canon 17-55 with the sigma 17-50 OS, saves you $450 right there and you don't lose anything much.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gocolts
Goldmember
1,246 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Oct 2010
     
Oct 20, 2011 09:36 |  #8

pxchoi wrote in post #13278045 (external link)
I've got a kit that's pretty similar. I don't think you can go wrong with that setup.

Tamron 17-50 is an easy way to save a ton of money without much compromise.

60D + Tamron 17-50 + 70-200 should get you right around $2000 and have you pretty well covered.

This. But, if you want some extra reach, maybe consider replacing the Canon 70-200 with the new Tamron 70-300 OS. My father-in-law went with a barely used 50D, and I helped him track down good deals on the Tamron 17-50 & 70-300, and for the total out of pocket expense, he has a heck of a setup for a casual shooter like him.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mookalafalas
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,150 posts
Gallery: 54 photos
Likes: 598
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Southern Taiwan
     
Oct 20, 2011 09:50 |  #9

If it were me I'd get a second hand 5Dc for 1k, a used 70-200 f4 for 500 and a Tamron 28-75 and perhaps a 50mm 1.8. Full frame is nice...


Call me Al Gear Flickr (external link)
You don’t have to have a great lens to take great pictures—but it sure helps. –Ben Long

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
randy98mtu
Goldmember
Avatar
3,952 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 2045
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Oct 20, 2011 10:08 |  #10

I would get a 60D, Tamron 17-50, and a Canon 50 f/1.4 or 85 f/1.8. That would leave room for an extra battery and some memory cards and a few bucks for gas to go out and shoot. Or you could get the 70-200 f/4 non IS and be a couple hundred over budget (assuming new.)

Another option would be the 17-50, a prime, and a 55-250 and you would be in the same place as the 70-200 with great gear to learn on.


Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
Donate for Forum Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dfbovey
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Mar 2011
     
Oct 20, 2011 10:15 |  #11

With a similar budget I started off with a 7D, 28-135 IS (kit lens), Nifty 50 and Nifty 250.


Flickr (external link)
Canon 1D markIV - Canon 1D markIII - Canon 6D
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L - Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS - Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L - Canon EF 500mm f/4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Oct 20, 2011 11:16 |  #12

No mention of what you want to shoot.... that makes it hard to advise.

First I'd get 60D either with the EF-S 18-135 IS kit lens, or buy the camera body only and pick up a lightly used EF 28-135 IS off the local Craigslist (a whole lot of lens for $200, which is what they are going for in my area).

That's $1100 to $1200 spent, getting the camera from a reputible dealer with full warranty. You might save a little if buying body only, getting a refurb from Canon directly through their Loyalty Program.

Either of those walk-around lenses are pretty darned close focusing already. To experiment with macro, rather than get a dedicated macro lens right now, pick up a set of Kenko macro extension tubes for about $170. Those can be used to make any lens closer focusing, into near macro and macro magnifications with some. If you shop for these used, be sure to look for the "DG" designation if you think you might ever want to use them with EF-S lenses. The earlier ones that are only designated "CA/AF" are not EF-S compatible, can only be used on EF lenses. There are other, cheaper macro extension tubes. The Zeikos (also sold as Adorama ProOptic, Jessops, Vivitar, and more)... are about $100 and seem pretty good... but I'm not sure they can be used on EF-S lenses. The really cheap ones - under $50, sometimes even less than $25 - do not have electronic lens-to-camera contacts, so are a pain to work with... not much fun and not recommended unless very rarely used.

Only get the nifty fifty if you think you'll want to take occasional portriats. If you think you'll use it a lot, I'd suggest waitng and getting 50/1.4 (Sigma or Canon).... or if you find you use it more often, and 85mm (Canon f1.8 or Sigma f1.4).

If you have in mind more of a "standard" lens, then the Canon 28/1.8 or Sigma 30/1.4 would actually be a better choice (on the crop sensor of the 60D, this focal length acts more like the approx. 50mm standard lenses of film cameras in the past). My point, on modern crop sensor DSLRs, the old tried and true 50mm is no longer a standard lens... it's more of a short telephoto/portrait lens.

I'd suggest using the kit/walk-around zoom for a while, trying out the different focal lengths. You can tape the zoom ring in place and restrict yourself to a particular focal length for a day or two... or you can download software that analyzes your images and tells you what focal length you tend to use most.

What you might want to consider next really depends upon what you tend to do with your camera.

If you shoot scenics, cityscapes, architecture, etc., you will probably want a wider angle lens.

If you shoot sports, wildlife, for example, you would probably want a telephoto. If at all possible, get an IS (or equivalent OS) lens. Stabilization is most helpful on telephotos.

If you shoot portraits, then you'll likely want different lenses (such as those mentioned above).

A flash is a handy thing to have... If you need and use it. 430EX II is fine, but so are many others.... Used 420EX through 430EX I for example. 550EX through 580EX II are bigger and more powerful. 220EX through 270EX are smaller and more compact. There are also a lot of decent third party flashes available. The built in flash in the camera is pretty wimpy and in about the worst possible location, in relation to the lens axis, for redeye and ugly shadows. So, if you'll use it, an accessory flash can help a lot. I recommend considering a flash bracket of some sort and an off-camera shoe cord, so the flash can be moved even farther from the lens axis. A single flash with a an off-camera shoe also can serve for macro flash... there is no need to invest in an expensive dedicated macro flash initially.

Keep some of your budget back for memory cards, extra battery, perhaps some image editing software for your computer, extra RAM, or another hard drive for image storage. Photos take up a lot of space! I highly recommend books about digital photography and guide books specific for your camera, to most quickly and easily learn to use it well. Also, you might need a camera bag/backpack. And a decent tripod is a good thing to have.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
F-Stran
Senior Member
Avatar
403 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
     
Oct 20, 2011 13:14 |  #13

1) Canon 60D - $899
2) Tamron 17-50 - S459
3) Canon 55-250 - $200
4)Metz 50 AF1 flash - $230
5) Lowepro Rezo 180 AW bag - $55
6) 2 SanDisk Ultra 8 GB SDHC Memory Card (Class 6) cards - $38
7) Sanyo enelop batteries 4 - $11

Total $1904 (before taxes)


5DMK IV | 60D | 40D | Tamron 70-200 G2 | Sigma 35 f/1.4 | Tamron 17-50 | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 55-250
Flickr (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
camera ­ dude
Senior Member
275 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Oct 20, 2011 13:27 |  #14

F-Stran wrote in post #13279969 (external link)
1) Canon 60D - $899
2) Tamron 17-50 - S459
3) Canon 55-250 - $200
4)Metz 50 AF1 flash - $230
5) Lowepro Rezo 180 AW bag - $55
6) 2 SanDisk Ultra 8 GB SDHC Memory Card (Class 6) cards - $38
7) Sanyo enelop batteries 4 - $11

Total $1904 (before taxes)

Replace Tamron with Sigma and get kenko extension tubes.


7D | Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 | Sigma EF-S 30 1.4 | Canon 85 1.8 | Canon 135 2.0 L | 430EX | TT Speed Demon | Sony RX100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sourlemons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
34 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 21, 2011 04:18 as a reply to  @ camera dude's post |  #15

pxchoi wrote in post #13278045 (external link)
I've got a kit that's pretty similar. I don't think you can go wrong with that setup.

Tamron 17-50 is an easy way to save a ton of money without much compromise.

60D + Tamron 17-50 + 70-200 should get you right around $2000 and have you pretty well covered.

Yeah that sounds pretty good. I'm just deciding whether I really need a flash or not.. I shoot in low light quite a lot, but will the f2.8 aperture on the 17-50mm be good enough?

robertro wrote in post #13278140 (external link)
It all depends on what you want to shoot. Is size, weight more important, or are you willing to lug around big glass? Do you do portraits or landscapes? etc...

Hmm, I don't want my gear to be too heavy, preferable as light as possible. I shoot a little bit of everything :P but mostly nature and portraits I think..

Sirrith wrote in post #13278400 (external link)
replace the canon 17-55 with the sigma 17-50 OS, saves you $450 right there and you don't lose anything much.

That seems pretty good, but I'm quite concerned because I've heard that there are some copies that a really good, and some bad copies and I'm kinda scared? that I'll get a bad copy.. :confused:

gocolts wrote in post #13278878 (external link)
This. But, if you want some extra reach, maybe consider replacing the Canon 70-200 with the new Tamron 70-300 OS. My father-in-law went with a barely used 50D, and I helped him track down good deals on the Tamron 17-50 & 70-300, and for the total out of pocket expense, he has a heck of a setup for a casual shooter like him.

Yeah I was considering that before, but I want the constant aperture and the white colour of the Canon :D

Mookalafalas wrote in post #13278951 (external link)
If it were me I'd get a second hand 5Dc for 1k, a used 70-200 f4 for 500 and a Tamron 28-75 and perhaps a 50mm 1.8. Full frame is nice...

Yeah full frame is nice! :) But I've heard that the 5Dc is a bit outdated and I live in New Zealand and they don't have any for sale anywhere..

randy98mtu wrote in post #13279030 (external link)
I would get a 60D, Tamron 17-50, and a Canon 50 f/1.4 or 85 f/1.8. That would leave room for an extra battery and some memory cards and a few bucks for gas to go out and shoot. Or you could get the 70-200 f/4 non IS and be a couple hundred over budget (assuming new.)

Another option would be the 17-50, a prime, and a 55-250 and you would be in the same place as the 70-200 with great gear to learn on.

Hmm, I don't really use the 85mm focal length much though.. But I will take that into consideration thank you

amfoto1 wrote in post #13279366 (external link)
No mention of what you want to shoot.... that makes it hard to advise.

First I'd get 60D either with the EF-S 18-135 IS kit lens, or buy the camera body only and pick up a lightly used EF 28-135 IS off the local Craigslist (a whole lot of lens for $200, which is what they are going for in my area).

That's $1100 to $1200 spent, getting the camera from a reputible dealer with full warranty. You might save a little if buying body only, getting a refurb from Canon directly through their Loyalty Program.

Either of those walk-around lenses are pretty darned close focusing already. To experiment with macro, rather than get a dedicated macro lens right now, pick up a set of Kenko macro extension tubes for about $170. Those can be used to make any lens closer focusing, into near macro and macro magnifications with some. If you shop for these used, be sure to look for the "DG" designation if you think you might ever want to use them with EF-S lenses. The earlier ones that are only designated "CA/AF" are not EF-S compatible, can only be used on EF lenses. There are other, cheaper macro extension tubes. The Zeikos (also sold as Adorama ProOptic, Jessops, Vivitar, and more)... are about $100 and seem pretty good... but I'm not sure they can be used on EF-S lenses. The really cheap ones - under $50, sometimes even less than $25 - do not have electronic lens-to-camera contacts, so are a pain to work with... not much fun and not recommended unless very rarely used.

Only get the nifty fifty if you think you'll want to take occasional portriats. If you think you'll use it a lot, I'd suggest waitng and getting 50/1.4 (Sigma or Canon).... or if you find you use it more often, and 85mm (Canon f1.8 or Sigma f1.4).

If you have in mind more of a "standard" lens, then the Canon 28/1.8 or Sigma 30/1.4 would actually be a better choice (on the crop sensor of the 60D, this focal length acts more like the approx. 50mm standard lenses of film cameras in the past). My point, on modern crop sensor DSLRs, the old tried and true 50mm is no longer a standard lens... it's more of a short telephoto/portrait lens.

I'd suggest using the kit/walk-around zoom for a while, trying out the different focal lengths. You can tape the zoom ring in place and restrict yourself to a particular focal length for a day or two... or you can download software that analyzes your images and tells you what focal length you tend to use most.

What you might want to consider next really depends upon what you tend to do with your camera.

If you shoot scenics, cityscapes, architecture, etc., you will probably want a wider angle lens.

If you shoot sports, wildlife, for example, you would probably want a telephoto. If at all possible, get an IS (or equivalent OS) lens. Stabilization is most helpful on telephotos.

If you shoot portraits, then you'll likely want different lenses (such as those mentioned above).

A flash is a handy thing to have... If you need and use it. 430EX II is fine, but so are many others.... Used 420EX through 430EX I for example. 550EX through 580EX II are bigger and more powerful. 220EX through 270EX are smaller and more compact. There are also a lot of decent third party flashes available. The built in flash in the camera is pretty wimpy and in about the worst possible location, in relation to the lens axis, for redeye and ugly shadows. So, if you'll use it, an accessory flash can help a lot. I recommend considering a flash bracket of some sort and an off-camera shoe cord, so the flash can be moved even farther from the lens axis. A single flash with a an off-camera shoe also can serve for macro flash... there is no need to invest in an expensive dedicated macro flash initially.

Keep some of your budget back for memory cards, extra battery, perhaps some image editing software for your computer, extra RAM, or another hard drive for image storage. Photos take up a lot of space! I highly recommend books about digital photography and guide books specific for your camera, to most quickly and easily learn to use it well. Also, you might need a camera bag/backpack. And a decent tripod is a good thing to have.

Wow that was really detailed and informative thank you! I will take your ideas into consideration. Thank you! and to everyone that posted :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,228 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Best camera kit I can get with $2000?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
705 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.