Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 20 Oct 2011 (Thursday) 11:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Milkyway nightscapes

 
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,834 posts
Gallery: 719 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10955
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Post edited over 8 years ago by Eddie. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 17, 2015 05:11 |  #1921

jtsmith90 wrote in post #17386210 (external link)
Thank you so much I'm going to test this. An post the shot if it comes out well.

You can get great shots without stacking. Make sure your sky is properly dark, i.e far enough away from cities that you escape the light pollution. Then use 400/focal length as a starting point to get exposure time I.e. For a 16mm lens 400/16 = 25 seconds max. Set your ISO at say 3200 and take a test shot. If you have star trailing lower your shutter time. If you haven't picked up enough stars raise your ISO. Tweak settings from there.

Many of the great shots you see in this thread are single exposures

EDIT - I just noticed you have a crop camera. The formula for that should be 400/(focal length x 1.6)


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jtsmith90
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Townsville
     
Jan 17, 2015 14:40 |  #1922

xpfloyd wrote in post #17386539 (external link)
You can get great shots without stacking. Make sure your sky is properly dark, i.e far enough away from cities that you escape the light pollution. Then use 400/focal length as a starting point to get exposure time I.e. For a 16mm lens 400/16 = 25 seconds max. Set your ISO at say 3200 and take a test shot. If you have star trailing lower your shutter time. If you haven't picked up enough stars raise your ISO. Tweak settings from there.

Many of the great shots you see in this thread are single exposures

EDIT - I just noticed you have a crop camera. The formula for that should be 400/(focal length x 1.6)


Thankyou I'll give it a shot.


Josh
Cannon EOS 60d, Canon EF 24-70 f2.8L C USM EFS 18-55mm, Tamron SP 60mm macro, IS 18-135mm lens, 430 ex II Speedlite and a tripod

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
octavenoize
Hatchling
2 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2013
     
Jan 19, 2015 07:28 |  #1923

Hi everyone,
Just wanted to share this shot single exposure shot i took at Lake Pukaki , New Zealand

IMAGE: http://i61.tinypic.com/m8d0u9.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GoHokiesGo
Senior Member
Avatar
784 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 69
Joined Feb 2007
Location: N. Virginia
Post edited over 8 years ago by GoHokiesGo. (2 edits in all)
     
Jan 19, 2015 12:49 |  #1924

We spent new years week at Amboseli National Park in Kenya, so I was finally able to get a chance at some dark, isolated skies away from city light; unfortunately, the few days after new years were approaching a full moon, so there was a lot of moonlight in the sky.

Anyways, I still snagged a few cool shots with my newly acquired Bower 14mm and my 60D. My understanding is that the MW core isn't visible this time of year in the southern hemisphere, but I think I may have captured some portions of the milky way. I looked at a few various processing guides, and I attempted to add some gradients to brighten and enhance the colorful regions. I had fun shooting and editing these shots, it was amazing to see so many stars pop out.

Can you astro experts tell me if I actually captured the edges of the milky way in these photos? Did I overdo it trying to enhance those clusters, or do these look ok? First real attempt at getting the milky way, so appreciate any C&C for the next time I get somewhere dark enough to shoot star shots.
---------------
1) Cleanest shot, ISO 1600, but less stars visible. The brighter blue in the middle is where I attempted to bump out and enhance the main group of stars.

IMAGE: http://www.jasonpeacottphotography.com/Travel/Amboseli/i-Mx8mM2G/0/XL/IMG_7509-XL.jpg
---------------
2) Bumped up to ISO 5000 on the rest of these, my 60D wasnt so friendly with noise at those levels. Most of these have an elliptical mask in the middle to highlight that one cluster and try to see if I could find hints of the milky way.
IMAGE: http://www.jasonpeacottphotography.com/Travel/Amboseli/i-RBpJhjZ/0/L/IMG_7533-L.jpg
---------------
3) Tried playing with white balance a bit to go more black instead of deep blue.
IMAGE: http://www.jasonpeacottphotography.com/Travel/Amboseli/i-bF938XG/0/L/IMG_7540-L.jpg
---------------
4)
IMAGE: http://www.jasonpeacottphotography.com/Travel/Amboseli/i-zTDNZFk/0/L/IMG_7541-L.jpg

~Jason
Canon R6 -¤- Canon 6D -¤- Canon 60D
Canon RF50/1.2L -¤- Canon 135/2L
Canon16-35/4LIS -¤- Canon 24-105/4LIS -¤- Canon 70-200/4L
Canon 50/1.8 STM -¤- Samyang 14/2.8
Travel Website - Jason Peacott Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NewCreation
Goldmember
Avatar
3,216 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 616
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Michigan
     
Jan 19, 2015 13:26 |  #1925

Went to Michigan's Upper Peninsula last summer to grab some star shots

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/01/3/LQ_708657.jpg
Image hosted by forum (708657) © NewCreation [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

My name is Brenda ~Saved by grace, walking by faith
http://brendahoffmanph​otography.com (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Jan 19, 2015 21:28 |  #1926

octavenoize wrote in post #17389449 (external link)
Hi everyone,
Just wanted to share this shot single exposure shot i took at Lake Pukaki , New Zealand

QUOTED IMAGE

I really like this image. What was lighting the foreground?


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NCHANT
Goldmember
3,011 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2154
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Jan 21, 2015 22:35 |  #1927

Who's getting Milky Way withdrawals?

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7471/15718230153_7cd39d96af_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pWY3​da  (external link) The Kiwi Way (external link) by Mikey Mack (external link), on Flickr

6D x 2 | TM SP 35mm ƒ1.4 | 50mm ƒ1.8 | 85mm ƒ1.8 | 24-105mm ƒ4L USM | 135mm ƒ2L | 200mm ƒ2.8L II | 17-40mm ƒ4L | Sy 24mm ƒ1.4 | Sy XP 14mm ƒ2.4 Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
montyw42
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 22, 2015 08:27 |  #1928

I am having horrible withdrawals! Can't wait until spring.

IMAGE: http://montywalters.smugmug.com/Travel/New-Mexico/i-95pKkwG/0/L/_MG_0329-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://montywalters.sm​ugmug.com/Travel/New-Mexico/i-95pKkwG/A  (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jan 22, 2015 08:42 |  #1929

You do know that even tho the north end of the Milkyway is not as exciting you can still take images of the North Milkyway . That's something that surprises me is that people that have new cameras with those really high ISOs' are not even atempting to image . Heck when you see an imag that shows the MW from horizon to horizon that should make some try the North end .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
Avatar
4,544 posts
Gallery: 917 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 12006
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Applecross, Scotland
     
Jan 22, 2015 09:41 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #1930

Here's the north end. Ignorance is bliss - I didn't notice the south end was more exciting!

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7574/15484074764_70ff734b6c_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pAgV​Yh  (external link) Milky Way from Culduie, Applecross [Explore] (external link) by AnnieMacD (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Celestron
Cream of the Crop
8,641 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 406
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Texas USA
     
Jan 22, 2015 11:10 |  #1931

AnnieMacD wrote in post #17394669 (external link)
Here's the north end. Ignorance is bliss - I didn't notice the south end was more exciting!


South MW is wider , more brighter , has hundreds of DSOs' and has the TeaPot (Sagittarius) and Scorpio constellations which are the two most exciting constellations in our night sky for imaging . Yours is a beautiful shot but that's cause of the aurora and northern lights . Try getting a good image of the N. MW when the sky is clear and no auroras . I'm talking about like this one of Bryan Hansel :

http://www.northshorea​rtscene.com …2/11/hansel-milky-way.jpg (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AnnieMacD
Oops, me again
Avatar
4,544 posts
Gallery: 917 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 12006
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Applecross, Scotland
     
Jan 22, 2015 14:31 as a reply to  @ Celestron's post |  #1932

Thanks, I'll try, if we ever get another clear night!


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
montyw42
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 22, 2015 20:47 as a reply to  @ montyw42's post |  #1933

IMAGE: http://montywalters.smugmug.com/Travel/New-Mexico/i-95pKkwG/0/L/_MG_0329-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://montywalters.sm​ugmug.com/Travel/New-Mexico/i-95pKkwG/A  (external link)

This is the northern end of the Milky Way. Shot in November. I believe that Is Andromeda in the upper right.


IMAGE: http://montywalters.smugmug.com/Travel/New-Mexico/i-tHSp5Nn/0/L/_MG_0343-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://montywalters.sm​ugmug.com/Travel/New-Mexico/i-tHSp5Nn/A  (external link)

This is the southern end shot the same night. I very much prefer to shoot south when possible.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kwscore
Senior Member
Avatar
277 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2012
     
Feb 02, 2015 05:11 |  #1934

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7317/15806382193_e9d1db4f5a_b.jpg
Astro Tree (external link) by kwscore (external link) on Flickr

5D II|S 14 2.8 |Σ 35 1.4|
D4 |14-24 |
Flickrexternal link

You Dont Need Telescopeexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NCHANT
Goldmember
3,011 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2154
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Feb 03, 2015 17:50 |  #1935

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8642/16252896227_975affd48d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qLdk​NK  (external link) Kai Iwi Way (external link) by Mikey Mack (external link), on Flickr

6D x 2 | TM SP 35mm ƒ1.4 | 50mm ƒ1.8 | 85mm ƒ1.8 | 24-105mm ƒ4L USM | 135mm ƒ2L | 200mm ƒ2.8L II | 17-40mm ƒ4L | Sy 24mm ƒ1.4 | Sy XP 14mm ƒ2.4 Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,144,853 views & 10,148 likes for this thread, 698 members have posted to it and it is followed by 324 members.
Milkyway nightscapes
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1701 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.