Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 20 Oct 2011 (Thursday) 11:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Milkyway nightscapes

 
tuffty
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Gallery: 75 photos
Likes: 410
Joined Sep 2015
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Apr 04, 2016 08:13 |  #2851

Please excuse what will no doubt be a blatantly obvious n00b style question but... I assume if you can't actually see the milkyway visually you are unlikely to be able to capture it photographically?

I realise this may sound ridiculous to you seasoned milkywayists but as I seem to live in an area of perpetual light I have nothing to benchmark my experiences on..

I can honestly say I have not actually seen it myself while attempting to capture it and naively assumed its a bit like a DSO where you have to expose long enough under the right conditions to make it visible in a capture

Fairly confident I am pointing my camera in the right direction (according to the plethora of apps I use lol) but despite my best efforts all I really get is 'some' stars...

<tuffty/>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1028
Joined May 2013
     
Apr 04, 2016 08:14 |  #2852

tuffty wrote in post #17960166 (external link)
Please excuse what will no doubt be a blatantly obvious n00b style question but... I assume if you can't actually see the milkyway visually you are unlikely to be able to capture it photographically?

I realise this may sound ridiculous to you seasoned milkywayists but as I seem to live in an area of perpetual light I have nothing to benchmark my experiences on..

I can honestly say I have not actually seen it myself while attempting to capture it and naively assumed its a bit like a DSO where you have to expose long enough under the right conditions to make it visible in a capture

Fairly confident I am pointing my camera in the right direction (according to the plethora of apps I use lol) but despite my best efforts all I really get is 'some' stars...

<tuffty/>

Hmmm, im not sure about your first statement. The first time i managed to get a good picture of it, i wasnt able to see it with bare eyes until I captured it, and knew its exact position in the sky.


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuffty
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Gallery: 75 photos
Likes: 410
Joined Sep 2015
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Apr 04, 2016 08:26 |  #2853

davidfarina wrote in post #17960167 (external link)
Hmmm, im not sure about your first statement. The first time i managed to get a good picture of it, i wasnt able to see it with bare eyes until I captured it, and knew its exact position in the sky.

Thanks... this is exactly what I was getting at... visually I can't see the milkyway where I am so I am just trying to eliminate as many factors as I can for my inability to be able to capture it.. I have the kit and confident I am pointing in the right direction but trying to work out if its due to my ineptitude or being in too heavy a light polluted area (essentially yellow areas on the darksite map)... or more likely both in my case lol..

I have another location to try when a clear night eventually presents itself... a friend of mine said she can see it from her back garden and they live in a fairly secluded area a little distance from me so will have another go there...

<tuffty/>




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1028
Joined May 2013
     
Apr 04, 2016 08:58 |  #2854

tuffty wrote in post #17960176 (external link)
Thanks... this is exactly what I was getting at... visually I can't see the milkyway where I am so I am just trying to eliminate as many factors as I can for my inability to be able to capture it.. I have the kit and confident I am pointing in the right direction but trying to work out if its due to my ineptitude or being in too heavy a light polluted area (essentially yellow areas on the darksite map)... or more likely both in my case lol..

I have another location to try when a clear night eventually presents itself... a friend of mine said she can see it from her back garden and they live in a fairly secluded area a little distance from me so will have another go there...

<tuffty/>

I understand youre kind of frustrated with this. I was heading out in the middle of the nights to get a picture of the MW but either clouds showed up or light pollution was too bad. I even wondered that maybe im still not good enough to get a picture of it, until one day i got it. Here in switzerland its not so easy to find dark skyes as the cities are all so close to each other. I couldnt see the MW when i captured it, i just knew in which direction to shoot and used a compass. After seeing it on my LCD screen i was really released as it finally worked out for me. And after seeing it on the LCD screen and knowing the position of the MW, i was then able to barely see it with my eyes.


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ev601
Junior Member
26 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 76
Joined Oct 2014
Location: Adelaide
     
Apr 04, 2016 22:01 |  #2855

A couple from South Australia on the weekend...... Still some work to go, but undoubtedly my best effort yet.

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1468/26174269451_3bcf069f05_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FSVY​pM  (external link) 20160402 Sunnydale-6742 (external link) by Evan Klose (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1505/26133598002_62657d92fb_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/FPkw​cU  (external link) 20160402 Sunnydale-6762 (external link) by Evan Klose (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
d4z0mg
Member
60 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 23
Joined Nov 2014
     
Apr 05, 2016 01:44 |  #2856

tuffty wrote in post #17960166 (external link)
Please excuse what will no doubt be a blatantly obvious n00b style question but... I assume if you can't actually see the milkyway visually you are unlikely to be able to capture it photographically?

I realise this may sound ridiculous to you seasoned milkywayists but as I seem to live in an area of perpetual light I have nothing to benchmark my experiences on..

I can honestly say I have not actually seen it myself while attempting to capture it and naively assumed its a bit like a DSO where you have to expose long enough under the right conditions to make it visible in a capture

Fairly confident I am pointing my camera in the right direction (according to the plethora of apps I use lol) but despite my best efforts all I really get is 'some' stars...

<tuffty/>

It depends what you're shooting with as well and the settings used. I notice you live in the UK too (I live in Kent). I shot the Milky Way for the first time last summer when I went just along the coast from Camber Sands using a Canon 600D and a Sigma 17-50 2.8. It showed up but wasn't the best picture as I couldn't push the camera that hard and that was the only time I've ever seen it in person but it was extremely faint. You know when it's so dark that if you look directly at something you can't see it but when you look to the side slightly you can see it, like that and it was incredibly dark where I was. Having upgraded my equipment over christmas I'm hoping to get some better shots this summer.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79448
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 05, 2016 01:51 as a reply to  @ tuffty's post |  #2857

Not a noob question at all.
Thank God the camera can see much more than we can.
Not a MW so please excuse, just to show the point.
When I took this I could not see any aurora but the 6D could.
Here in the east USA dark sites are a rarity but I'm going to one tomorrow morning
with fingers crossed.

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2809/9890879256_e8f2f5b66b_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/g52k​NY  (external link) Small taste of the Aurora Borealis with full Moon and Clouds (external link) by MedicineMan4040 (external link), on Flickr

flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79448
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 05, 2016 01:53 as a reply to  @ post 17960102 |  #2858

Huge difference when you go from letter A to letter E, drives home the point that no matter where you
are get out of the city eh.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuffty
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Gallery: 75 photos
Likes: 410
Joined Sep 2015
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
     
Apr 05, 2016 02:35 as a reply to  @ d4z0mg's post |  #2859

I have a 6D and a Samyang 24mm f1.4 lens now... in fairness I was probably shooting more based on my previous setup (50D and 24mm f2.8) and was struggling a little...

The other issue I have is finding somewhere I feel safe and comfortable to shoot... I am not particularly outdoory so tend not to be too relaxed when I am out late... I get better once into it but not being relaxed probably isn't helping either

This was one of my 'better' efforts from my 50D...

IMAGE: http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k30/tufftybloke/Photography/Astrophotograpy/20160305-IMG_8974.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://i84.photobucket​.com …apy/20160305-IMG_8974.jpg  (external link) on photobucket

That was probably the darkest place I could find a the time bearing in mind it was a last minute excursion as the skies weren't 100% clear and I ended up driving through a maze of country roads to find somewhere that was a) dark enough, b) cloudless in the right direction and c) where I could actually park the car...

As it was the police arrived some 30mins later asking if I was hare coursing...! I didn't even know that was a thing until they said :)

<tuffty/>



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MedicineMan4040
The Magic Johnson of Cameras
Avatar
22,570 posts
Gallery: 1956 photos
Best ofs: 7
Likes: 79448
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 05, 2016 05:07 |  #2860

Concerning the Rokinon/Samyang 14mm F2.8 does everybody know that LonelySpeck is developing a SharpStar for it:
http://www.lonelyspeck​.com/ (external link)
MickeyMack doesn't need it! but for us older blinding photogs anything helps.
But in the meantime here is something else to consider for 'normal' lenses that can accept a filter:
http://www.dpreview.co​m/forums/thread/369270​7 (external link)
I ordered one for my Sony 28/2, off flee-bay, it was only something like 5 bucks....I only get to attempt MW about two
times a year so I don't know if I'd get to use the SharpStar that often.


flickr (external link)
Vid Collection: https://www.youtube.co​m/user/medicineman4040 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
virginie24jb
Senior Member
955 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1533
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Twizel, New Zealand
Post edited over 7 years ago by virginie24jb. (2 edits in all)
     
Apr 05, 2016 09:20 |  #2861

tuffty wrote in post #17961282 (external link)
This was one of my 'better' efforts from my 50D...

I think the very first thing to do is to see at what time the MW core is actually visible. When was this photo taken?
I see you're in the UK, I'm in France. The Milky Way rise around the same time for you and me and at this time of the year it's at 3 a.m in the South-East before moving towards the South.

Later in the year, it will be earlier and in the South-West direction.

You should also shoot with a shorter shutter speed if you use 24mm, around 10 seconds based on the 500 rule : 500 divided by the focal length of your lens = the longest exposure (in seconds) before you start getting startrails :

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/1/LQ_785485.jpg
Image hosted by forum (785485) © virginie24jb [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

http://www.virginie-bitterlin.com (external link)
http://www.visiting-washington.com (external link)
Instagram (external link) - Facebook (external link)
Canon 6D, Canon T4i/650D, Canon 24-105, 18-135 IS STM, 50 f/1.8, Canon 70-200 f/4, Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 24mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tuffty
Member
Avatar
133 posts
Gallery: 75 photos
Likes: 410
Joined Sep 2015
Location: Gloucestershire, UK
Post edited over 7 years ago by tuffty.
     
Apr 05, 2016 09:38 |  #2862

virginie24jb wrote in post #17961484 (external link)
I think the very first thing to do is to see at what time the MW core is actually visible. When was this photo taken?
I see you're in the UK, I'm in France. The Milky Way rise around the same time for you and me and at this time of the year it's at 3 a.m in the South-East before moving towards the South.

Later in the year, it will be earlier and in the South-West direction.

You should also shoot with a shorter shutter speed if you use 24mm, around 10 seconds based on the 500 rule : 500 divided by the focal length of your lens = the longest exposure (in seconds) before you start getting startrails :

Hosted photo: posted by virginie24jb in
./showthread.php?p=179​61484&i=i208930823
forum: Astronomy & Celestial

I am not so much interested in capturing the core at this time... any of it would be fine...

I have been using an Android app called PlanIt! for Photographers... for example I am venturing out to a location tonight more as a recce as a friend I used to work with lives nearby and says she has seen the milkyway from her back garden... suggests its a dark enough location so thought it was worth a punt...

IMAGE: http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k30/tufftybloke/Photography/Astrophotograpy/tarlton01.jpg

IMAGE: http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k30/tufftybloke/Photography/Astrophotograpy/tarlton02.jpg

IMAGE: http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k30/tufftybloke/Photography/Astrophotograpy/tarlton03.jpg

That app suggests that position of the milkyway will be where I want it from 10pm to 11pm tonight... the core is visible (quite low on the curve) from 1.52am to 3.28am... certainly not worth me getting up for at this time but a core shot is on the to do list...

<tuffty/>

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/1/LQ_785489.jpg
Image hosted by forum (785489) © tuffty [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2016/04/1/LQ_785490.jpg
Image hosted by forum (785490) © tuffty [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eddie
xpfloyd lookalike
Avatar
14,820 posts
Gallery: 717 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10916
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
     
Apr 05, 2016 11:24 |  #2863

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #17961338 (external link)
Concerning the Rokinon/Samyang 14mm F2.8 does everybody know that LonelySpeck is developing a SharpStar for it:
http://www.lonelyspeck​.com/ (external link)
MickeyMack doesn't need it! but for us older blinding photogs anything helps.
But in the meantime here is something else to consider for 'normal' lenses that can accept a filter:
http://www.dpreview.co​m/forums/thread/369270​7 (external link)
I ordered one for my Sony 28/2, off flee-bay, it was only something like 5 bucks....I only get to attempt MW about two
times a year so I don't know if I'd get to use the SharpStar that often.

Great info! I now want a sharpstar2!


Leica M11 | Leica Q2 | Sony α7RV
Voigtlander 28 f/2 Ulton II | Leica 50 Summilux ASPH
16-35GM | 24GM | 35GM | 85GM | Tamron 35-150 | Sigma 105 Macro Art

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gaabnz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,250 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 5256
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 05, 2016 14:36 |  #2864

xpfloyd wrote in post #17961596 (external link)
Great info! I now want a sharpstar2!

I just used mine for the first time last week on my 24mm 1.4 Samyang.

I only used it in the garden at home, but it makes focusing so easy. If you can get it for you lens, you will love it.

Just make sure you remember to take the filter off when you shoot ! My first shot I left in on and was very concerned at the resulting image hahaha. Once its off, its great :P


Sony A7mkiii / Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 / Zeiss FE35 f2.8 / EF24-105F4L / EF70-200f4L / EF50mm f1.8 / Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnPh
I smell like a Shoulder Shrugging Seal
Avatar
2,489 posts
Gallery: 196 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1989
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Deepst darkest Cornwall
     
Apr 05, 2016 15:02 |  #2865

Fantastic info on the sharpstar, looks like a little bhatinov mask!


ՕFlickr (external link)500px (external link)
Facebook (external link)
serial underexposer
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,130,281 views & 10,101 likes for this thread, 697 members have posted to it and it is followed by 326 members.
Milkyway nightscapes
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
613 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.