Idk. That's why I'm asking. 
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:35 | #6721 Idk. That's why I'm asking.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyniev Cream of the Crop  More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:39 | #6722 Fricks wrote in post #13373877  i love it tony! thanks Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Fricks Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title  More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:40 | #6723 guest speaker today ISO 3200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyniev Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:44 | #6724 Thanks. Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff  19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:47 | #6725 Oh, I figured Nick Le Sigh would chime in. Very little difference between cat 5e and 6 standards. The big one is the improved shielding of the Cat6 standard, which is especially important with tons of electronics around that introduce noise. Less noise = less retransmissions = good, in theory. For most people with a single cable running from pointA to pointB, makes little difference. Supposedly higher bandwidth capable with the cat6, but never personally did any throughput tests. When I was working for the government, they pretty much opted for cat5e over 6. Not sure if that's changed these last few years.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:49 | #6726 jdizzle wrote in post #13373735 I think Cat 6 is rate for 1000 MBPs. cat 5e can handle about as much
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:50 | #6727 tonyniev wrote in post #13373859 it takes at least two weeks to put up the interior, outdoor is a week. That's what kids are for, I guess.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyniev Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:52 | #6728 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13373971 That's what kids are for, I guess. no more kids at home, we have a house help Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:06 | #6729 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13373960 Oh, I figured Nick Le Sigh would chime in. Very little difference between cat 5e and 6 standards. The big one is the improved shielding of the Cat6 standard, which is especially important with tons of electronics around that introduce noise. Less noise = less retransmissions = good, in theory. For most people with a single cable running from pointA to pointB, makes little difference. Supposedly higher bandwidth capable with the cat6, but never personally did any throughput tests. When I was working for the government, they pretty much opted for cat5e over 6. Not sure if that's changed these last few years. Is Cat6 worth the price difference? Sure, if you're not wiring up much. I was using up 500 foot spools pretty quickly, and the price can add up. Crimping cat6 really isn't anymore difficult than cat5e MOkoFOko wrote in post #13373970 cat 5e can handle about as much ^^Thanks for your help. Nick is busy watching CSI.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that)  25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:07 | #6730 Fricks wrote in post #13373926 guest speaker today ISO 3200
Not bad. Shooting speakers like that sucks
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:16 | #6731 Prices of 1Ds III go up! It's true that the body has gone up in price but, it remains to be seen if the prices will drop once the 1D X starts shipping.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:20 | #6732 Tony Niev, I found this for you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:21 | #6733 Wow! Canon 1Ds III for $4700.00 USD.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyniev Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:22 | #6734 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13373161 Woowoo, you're now better than anyone else! Except those who have better equipment jdizzle wrote in post #13374070 Tony Niev, I found this for you.  http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1059359 Nice, but this is at the end of my lens to buy list...no exoenses this holidays...24L is first in line Cheers,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:23 | #6735 tonyniev wrote in post #13374081 Nice, but this is at the end of my lens to buy list...no exoenses this holidays...24L is first in line  Yes, 24 L is very good at 1.4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2576 guests, 90 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
