Those were back from '07 when I was new to the 1D3 and getting used to the combo
!

tonylong ...winded More info | Oct 24, 2011 01:44 | #1186 Those were back from '07 when I was new to the 1D3 and getting used to the combo Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Oct 24, 2011 01:48 | #1187 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13296340 Oh? Since when are you chinese? So he's just a paper-tiger monarch of your company Dethrone him and be done with it!hahaha All my life :P jdizzle wrote in post #13296345 I'd fire him too! Take all the profit so you can get that Nikon D3s and D3x you've always wanted! ![]() ![]() hehehe no... that's not possible!! then who will manage here if I go away? that's the perks of me having somebody here to run the daily operation when I am away
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Oct 24, 2011 01:50 | #1188 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13296369 Super. Monkey can put together a flip-book showing his fathers displeasure in slow-motion. hehehe he has been pretty pleased with me mind you jdizzle wrote in post #13296371 Here's Steven with his new Nikon D3X. ![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2wD5TaMf2k hahaha Say hello to my new friend?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Oct 24, 2011 01:51 | #1189 right now I can tell you the 16-35mm f/4 VR is soo damn nice to hand held during night time hehe... I shot the mall last night without any support and I think I got some good shots
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Oct 24, 2011 01:58 | #1190 tonylong wrote in post #13296396 Well, they were both hand-held at f/2.8, ISO 800, meaning a "bit" of a loss there. But I don't know what you mean about the Wood Duck and color...it looked good to me. I have other shots that are better for showing fine detail, though, I just don't want to "hog" this thread! That was a wooden duck? That may explain the colors and some of the lack of definition I was seeing in the feathers... In any case my 70-200 IS mk1 is long gone, and all that I will remember is that it was inferior to the mark2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:06 | #1191 Hey, well, for a hand-held 100% crop it was pretty dang good, and it would print nicely as a 4x6 or 5x7! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:11 | #1192 tonylong wrote in post #13296439 Hey, well, for a hand-held 100% crop it was pretty dang good, and it would print nicely as a 4x6 or 5x7! Now that I really look at it, I think I'm slightly surprised ISO 800 is so noisy on the 1d3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:19 | #1193 I am not sure if its sharp enough, I am looking at this through my laptop but this one was taken at 0.3 seconds, f/5 ISO 1600
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:31 | #1194 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13296449 Now that I really look at it, I think I'm slightly surprised ISO 800 is so noisy on the 1d3 I have unrealistic expectations![]() Yeah, realize that image digital noise is a relative thing -- all cameras have it, it's just to what degree they show it. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:38 | #1195 tonylong wrote in post #13296503 Yeah, realize that image digital noise is a relative thing -- all cameras have it, it's just to what degree they show it. I shot with a 30D prior to my 5D and 1D3, so I know the improvements, but there ain't nothin' perfect !At 800 ISO, the 1dx had better be darn near perfect
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff 19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:39 | #1196 monk3y wrote in post #13296479 I am not sure if its sharp enough, I am looking at this through my laptop but this one was taken at 0.3 seconds, f/5 ISO 1600 Quite a bit of movement there for 0.3s. Those people down there must have really been on the move
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Oct 24, 2011 02:45 | #1197 It sounds like if the 1DX lives up to its potential, it just might knock our socks off Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monk3y Totally Saturated More info | Oct 24, 2011 04:45 | #1198 MOkoFOko wrote in post #13296518 Quite a bit of movement there for 0.3s. Those people down there must have really been on the move I was testing what I could do with the lens during night time... I think that shot is pretty acceptable
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Oct 24, 2011 05:15 | #1199 monk3y wrote in post #13296733 I was testing what I could do with the lens during night time... I think that shot is pretty acceptable ![]() You need a 24 pc-e.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!" More info | Oct 24, 2011 06:01 | #1200 Bleh so i couldnt sleep..my mind was wandering... Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 973 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||