Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 24 Oct 2011 (Monday) 09:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which should I follow? LR3 & online hosting problem

 
XxDJCyberLoverxX
Goldmember
Avatar
1,139 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 148
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
     
Oct 24, 2011 09:44 |  #1

I notice that the colors/saturation of my edited photos on Lightroom 3 looks MUCH more different than when I upload them onto Flickr and 500px.

It looks much less saturated on online hosting websites. I edit my photos according to how they look in LR3. After I Export them and open it up with Preview (I use a 13" Macbook Pro), the colors still look the same.

Does my Macbook or LR3 have some color problems, or is Flickr and 500px really desaturating my photos? Which colors should I follow? I don't really look at my pictures from other computers, so I don't know how others view my pictures.


Daniel
Sony a7 / Sony a7s / FE 24-70mm / FE 28mm F/2 / Samyang 135mm
Nebula 4000 Lite / Manfrotto 190cx
POTN Feedback / My Work! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 24, 2011 11:10 |  #2

Use sRGB and embed the profile, or use a fully color managed browser.

Have a look in the links from my sig, or here: www.getcolormanaged.co​m/color-management/saveforweb/ (external link)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XxDJCyberLoverxX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,139 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 148
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
     
Oct 24, 2011 20:16 |  #3

Thank you Rene! I'll look at the links you supplied.


Daniel
Sony a7 / Sony a7s / FE 24-70mm / FE 28mm F/2 / Samyang 135mm
Nebula 4000 Lite / Manfrotto 190cx
POTN Feedback / My Work! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Oct 24, 2011 20:51 |  #4

Basically, what Rene is saying is LR is outputting your images (most likely) in the ProPhoto color space. The best space for the web is sRGB.

LR (and PS) is very capable of converting these colors and maintaining nearly all of them in an appropriate space for the web that can be seen in color managed browsers. You most likely will not be able to see a difference once the appropriate conversion takes place and the correct profile is in place.

So, build yourself a preset export for outputting jpgs at the desired size with the appropriate profile in LR's exporting dialog; or take them to Photoshop to do it manually by using "save for the web". I'm sure Rene's link has a tutorial.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XxDJCyberLoverxX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,139 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 148
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
     
Oct 31, 2011 00:24 |  #5

Thanks Alan and Rene. Sorry for the late reply; I just saw this thread again.

The sRGB color space really, really helped! My colors are much more accurate now.

I'm curious: if I was to print these pictures, would the sRGB color space also be the most appropriate to ensure that I get the most accurate colors on photo paper? (Assuming my printer can handle the color gamut).


Daniel
Sony a7 / Sony a7s / FE 24-70mm / FE 28mm F/2 / Samyang 135mm
Nebula 4000 Lite / Manfrotto 190cx
POTN Feedback / My Work! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 31, 2011 00:54 |  #6

XxDJCyberLoverxX wrote in post #13330961 (external link)
Thanks Alan and Rene. Sorry for the late reply; I just saw this thread again.

The sRGB color space really, really helped! My colors are much more accurate now.

I'm curious: if I was to print these pictures, would the sRGB color space also be the most appropriate to ensure that I get the most accurate colors on photo paper? (Assuming my printer can handle the color gamut).

If you do your own printing, you can let Lightroom manage the colors, or send a file from Lightroom to your printer, and the color space won't matter -- the software sorts it out.

If you send to a lab, you have to get the specs from them -- some will specify sRGB, in fact most will be quite happy with that space, but some will either allow for or even prefer something else. Check with the provider!

And, glad you got your problem sorted!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
Avatar
3,558 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
     
Oct 31, 2011 03:49 |  #7

To add to what Tony said, just make sure you are soft proofing correctly for whatever printing workflow you will be using. If you're using an in-house printer, make sure your monitor is calibrated and use the appropriate soft proofing profile (PS) for the media you intend to print. If you are using a lab, make sure you have their soft proofing profiles during your editing. As long as your monitor is calibrated and you are using those profiles, your print from any lab should be spot on.

A lot of people think you have to get all techy in the printing. If you're printing to a printer at home, nearly all printer manufacturers (or, at least the descent ones like Epson, Canon, etc.) have their crap together and you can 9 times out of 10 use their profiles and allow the printer to handle the management. I actually use a Epson 7800 for fine art reproductions and nearly always let the printer handle the colors. (talking sRGB here of course) It's extremely rare that I have to print twice to fix something... if ever.

The main thing is to make sure your monitor is calibrated and you are using the correct soft proofing profile for the target printer and media. It's that simple.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XxDJCyberLoverxX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,139 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 148
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
     
Nov 02, 2011 08:34 |  #8

Thank you. I planned to send my prints to a lab to get it done, but I just haven't gotten around to it.

I need to look at calibrating my monitor and soft proofing profiles from different labs.

Thanks a lot!


Daniel
Sony a7 / Sony a7s / FE 24-70mm / FE 28mm F/2 / Samyang 135mm
Nebula 4000 Lite / Manfrotto 190cx
POTN Feedback / My Work! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,142 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Which should I follow? LR3 & online hosting problem
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1036 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.