would love to get some feedback on the processing here...
swetsastonic Senior Member 440 posts Joined Sep 2010 More info | Oct 25, 2011 21:14 | #1 would love to get some feedback on the processing here...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
russ71satellite Goldmember More info | Oct 25, 2011 22:05 | #2 Very pretty shot, but seems just a tiny bit overprocessed to me. Maybe the green is a bit strong. Canon EOS 5D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Yongnuo YN560II, Dynaphos strobe, 16 inch beauty dish, Vagabond mini.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
whoty Goldmember More info | Oct 26, 2011 01:12 | #3 The green does seem a bit overpowering. When I look at this image,my eyes are drawn to the green. Not because of the path of rocks either. It could use a slight vignette to bring the bridge out more. That way,viewer's eyes wouldn't jump all over the image. There is nothing worse than a brilliant image of a fuzzy concept. - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joedlh Cream of the Crop 5,511 posts Gallery: 52 photos Likes: 684 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea. More info | Oct 26, 2011 13:57 | #4 This is a familiar setting for me because I frequent the Catskills and Appalachians. So the overall lightness of it created a paradox in my mind's eye. It's usually much darker because of dense overgrowth and the hilly terrain. You might see something like this in the early spring when leaves are just bursting forth. Joe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | I don't know...I took three looks at different times, and I just have a hard time focusing on any one thing...just looks a bit to busy for me. There's also something about the greens...looks over-saturated or like something you'd see in an HDR-processed image. Maybe that's how it looked, but they just look too "electric" for lack of a better word. As joedlh pointed out, its always good to walk around an area, try out different vantage points, even different comps such as closeups of the fall foliage on the rocks, etc. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 27, 2011 06:06 | #6 excellent...this is what I was looking for, thank you all. I hear you on the greens. I probably did oversaturate it. that should be an easy fix. as far as the angle, I wanted to get the water in it and, as you can see, there wasn't a ton running...that was the main reason for the positioning. I'll head back there and see if I can't accomplish both in a better way.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SimpleJack Senior Member 846 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Washington More info | Google Hyperfocal Distance also, that will help out alot. Canon PowerShot S100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1386 guests, 178 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||