Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 25 Oct 2011 (Tuesday) 21:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Turtleback Falls NC C&C

 
rlineberg
Member
168 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
     
Oct 25, 2011 21:57 |  #1

I photographed Turtleback falls this past weekend and these a few of my favorites.

C&C would be greatly appreciated.

Which composition works best?

Image 1

IMAGE: http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g300/rlineberg/IMG_0847.jpg

Image 2
IMAGE: http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g300/rlineberg/IMG_0845.jpg

Image 3
IMAGE: http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g300/rlineberg/IMG_0828.jpg

5D Mark II, 24-105 f/4, 580EXII, 2 Lumpro 160's.
website: http://robertlineberg.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Pick
Senior Member
Avatar
441 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Middle Tennessee
     
Oct 26, 2011 10:57 |  #2

I like the composition of number 1 the best. Number 3 would be my second choice.


60D / EOS Elan / 15-85 IS USM / 70-200 f4L IS / 50 1.4 / 430ex / Fujifilm X100s / Slik U-212 (a genuine antique, like me....)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DCBB ­ Photography
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,158 posts
Gallery: 478 photos
Likes: 20801
Joined Nov 2008
Location: North GA
     
Oct 26, 2011 11:07 |  #3

I think I prefer number 3. One would be nice but I think the rock in the lower left is distracting.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ Abuja
Senior Member
Avatar
489 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Markham Ontario
     
Oct 26, 2011 11:08 |  #4

I like the scene / location, I agree that #1 has my composition vote.
I would consider trying to shoot this with different lighting conditions or do an HDR.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rlineberg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
168 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
     
Oct 26, 2011 11:19 |  #5

jcothron wrote in post #13309609 (external link)
I think I prefer number 3. One would be nice but I think the rock in the lower left is distracting.

Thanks for the comments. I have looked through a lot of your waterfall shots and was hoping you would give me your .02 cents.

On a side note, I recently moved to Georgia and have been wanting to photograph some waterfalls/streams here, but I am not sure where to start. Any recommendations that you particularly enjoy shooting and what time of day is best?


5D Mark II, 24-105 f/4, 580EXII, 2 Lumpro 160's.
website: http://robertlineberg.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crimzon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 405
Joined May 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Oct 26, 2011 11:53 |  #6

I'm torn between 1 and 3. Though I do like the composition of #1 I think it makes the waterfall look secondary. #3 has a more serene feel to it, I think mostly because the water has somewhere to go in my minds-eye.


My blog (external link)

Always feel free to provide constructive criticism to any of my pics.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DCBB ­ Photography
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,158 posts
Gallery: 478 photos
Likes: 20801
Joined Nov 2008
Location: North GA
     
Oct 26, 2011 12:01 |  #7

rlineberg wrote in post #13309687 (external link)
Thanks for the comments. I have looked through a lot of your waterfall shots and was hoping you would give me your .02 cents.

On a side note, I recently moved to Georgia and have been wanting to photograph some waterfalls/streams here, but I am not sure where to start. Any recommendations that you particularly enjoy shooting and what time of day is best?

Be glad to give you some ideas, what part of GA are you in? Do you like to hike a lot or are you looking for something close to the road? There are many options here.


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irishman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,098 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
Oct 26, 2011 12:01 |  #8

Crimzon wrote in post #13309865 (external link)
I'm torn between 1 and 3. Though I do like the composition of #1 I think it makes the waterfall look secondary. #3 has a more serene feel to it, I think mostly because the water has somewhere to go in my minds-eye.

+1.


6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rlineberg
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
168 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
     
Oct 26, 2011 12:48 |  #9

Thanks for all the comments! I am torn between 1 and 3 for the same reason.

All of these were shot with the 17-55mm 2.8 with the aperture at 20 or 22. I bring this up, because they look a little soft with these settings.

Does anyone have any post processing things I should try to help the photos?


5D Mark II, 24-105 f/4, 580EXII, 2 Lumpro 160's.
website: http://robertlineberg.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DCBB ­ Photography
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,158 posts
Gallery: 478 photos
Likes: 20801
Joined Nov 2008
Location: North GA
     
Oct 26, 2011 13:00 |  #10

Shoot at a slightly larger aperture. I believe diffraction will start softening your images on a crop sensor camera at f11-f13 if I remember correctly. You can kind of get by with f16 on FF. It could also be your focus point, but I"m not sure where that is. Do a search on hyperfocal point and read about that if you haven't already :)


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,149 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Turtleback Falls NC C&C
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1089 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.