Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 28 Oct 2011 (Friday) 18:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Picture

 
Lone-eagle
Senior Member
Avatar
269 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 28, 2011 18:33 |  #1

I took this picture of a tree & as you can see, I blew the sky completely out. I am including my setting. I assume my shutter speed was too slow or am I going at this all wrong.
SS 1/80, f8.0, iso 100, Raw, WB/Cloudy & AI Serrvo


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dale
Canon XSi, 18-55, 55-250, 85 f / 1.8, 24-105 f / 4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Oct 28, 2011 18:56 |  #2

The blowing out of the sky is the result of a combination of shutter speed, aperture and ISO, the exposure triad. The three factors work together to determine the lightness or darkness of the image, so you can't blame just one of them. But if we assume you want to keep aperture the same and ISO can't be lowered, then yes, to prevent the sky blowout you would need a higher speed. However, this would also darken the tree, so the photo will need some special treatment - lighting the tree with a flash, brightening the darker tones in post-processing (best done to a RAW image), or blending two exposures together.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,712 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16823
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Oct 28, 2011 18:59 |  #3

Since it was overcast there was not much to work with in the first place. Perhaps a 1/2 over exposed which can be corrected during PP but should you should always pay attention to exposure. This is a tough shot because of the sky itself and the flat light so don't be too hard on yourself. In advanced PP you can import blue skies or HDR tone mapping to get some life out if this shot. Not much you could do to get a colourful shot from this scene out of the camera.

You should also pay attention to how level your image is as well. It is a bit off.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lone-eagle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
269 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 28, 2011 19:06 |  #4

Thanks tzalman & digital paradise


Dale
Canon XSi, 18-55, 55-250, 85 f / 1.8, 24-105 f / 4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,363 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 28, 2011 20:08 |  #5

You might want to try this approach http://daystarvisions.​com/Docs/Tuts/DCExp/pg​1.html (external link), but it won't help when there's too much contrast between the brighter and darker areas. If the contrast is greater than your camera sensor can record, you will have to compromise and decide whether you want to keep the subject properly exposed while over-exposing the highlights, expose for the sky and have the subject too dark, or follow one of the suggestions above such as exposure bracketing or changing the light ratios by using something like fill flash or a neutral density filter.


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lone-eagle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
269 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 28, 2011 20:17 |  #6

Thanks stsva


Dale
Canon XSi, 18-55, 55-250, 85 f / 1.8, 24-105 f / 4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 28, 2011 22:14 |  #7

You are facing a big challenge, scenes with a high dynamic range! You will need to process this type of photo. The best thing to do is determine the exposure that will make sure you get what you need and not sacrifice what you want to keep.

If you need elements of the sky, you will end up likely underexposing the foreground a bit, and then will need to "boost" a bit in post-processing.

Check out shooting in Raw -- you will get more latitude in post-processing -- check out our RAW Conversion Thread!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lone-eagle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
269 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Oct 29, 2011 14:01 |  #8

Thanks Tony


Dale
Canon XSi, 18-55, 55-250, 85 f / 1.8, 24-105 f / 4L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 29, 2011 14:26 |  #9

Dale, here are some links to some "projects" of mine where I had to deal with those types of conditions and various approaches I've taken with Raw and a Raw converter. These are from that Raw conversion thread I linked to earlier:

Exposing for the sky and then recovering the shadows:

https://photography-on-the.net …p=12626872&post​count=3896

Expose To The Right and recover the sky:

https://photography-on-the.net …p=12699441&post​count=3946

A bit of both:

https://photography-on-the.net …p=12763110&post​count=3984

If you scroll through that thread, you will see probably hundreds of similar "projects"!

Hope it helps you and encourages you!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,076 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Picture
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
605 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.