Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 30 Oct 2011 (Sunday) 12:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Stacker Software

 
eaglesnest
Member
189 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 30, 2011 12:22 |  #1

I download Trial Zerene Stacker software to try out. The result is good; but it is so slow. To analyze and process 1 image took 5-10 min. What did I do wrong? it's not the computer. I have no problem with other programs such as Photomatix, PtGui, Topaz etc. Is there any other stacker software besides Zerene? I would like to try and compare the processing time.


www.eaglesnestphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LordV
Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006
Avatar
62,298 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6874
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Worthing UK
     
Oct 30, 2011 13:17 |  #2

eaglesnest wrote in post #13328641 (external link)
I download Trial Zerene Stacker software to try out. The result is good; but it is so slow. To analyze and process 1 image took 5-10 min. What did I do wrong? it's not the computer. I have no problem with other programs such as Photomatix, PtGui, Topaz etc. Is there any other stacker software besides Zerene? I would like to try and compare the processing time.

Stacking software does take some time to go through the images depending on how many and how large they are.
Another one to try is helicon focus.
Brian V.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lordv/ (external link)
http://www.lordv.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
Macro Hints and tips
Canon 600D, 40D, 5D mk2, 7D, Tamron 90mm macro, Sigma 105mm OS, Canon MPE-65,18-55 kit lens X2, canon 200mm F2.8 L, Tamron 28-70mm xrdi, Other assorted bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ G.
Goldmember
Avatar
2,247 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2009
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
     
Oct 30, 2011 18:30 as a reply to  @ LordV's post |  #3

5 minutes is not very slow, as Brian pointed out, it can sometimes take some time. 10 minutes could be, if you are trying to stack only a few images, but it would not be slow if you are going for a deep stack of a high amount of frames.

I was under the impression that Zerene is on the "fast" side as far as stacking goes. I do not think changing program will make a difference.

Not sure if that would make a difference, but I think you can decide how much memory of your computer you let Zerene use. Maybe that might be a problem if the allocated memory is too small?

How many images were you trying to stack?

Martin


6D & 70D
EF 24-105 L, EF 40mm, EF 85mm f1.8, EF 100mm L IS, MP-E 65
Macro Twin Flash MT-24EX, 430 EX II & 270 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eaglesnest
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
189 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 30, 2011 19:10 |  #4

Martin G. wrote in post #13329754 (external link)
5 minutes is not very slow, as Brian pointed out, it can sometimes take some time. 10 minutes could be, if you are trying to stack only a few images, but it would not be slow if you are going for a deep stack of a high amount of frames.

I was under the impression that Zerene is on the "fast" side as far as stacking goes. I do not think changing program will make a difference.

Not sure if that would make a difference, but I think you can decide how much memory of your computer you let Zerene use. Maybe that might be a problem if the allocated memory is too small?

How many images were you trying to stack?

Martin

Hi Martin,
How can I check what's the allocated memory given to Zerene?
I try to stack between 6-15 images.
What I mean by taking 5-8 minutes for analyzing and processing is for 1 image only, and not for the whole stack.

Thanks


www.eaglesnestphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ G.
Goldmember
Avatar
2,247 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2009
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
     
Oct 30, 2011 19:53 as a reply to  @ eaglesnest's post |  #5

go in "preferences" and than "memory usage", mine is set 4605 megabytes allocated for Zerene.

yes, it would appear long, I thought you meant for the whole stack.

not sure if it will make a difference, but try to modify this setting first and see what it does.

Martin


6D & 70D
EF 24-105 L, EF 40mm, EF 85mm f1.8, EF 100mm L IS, MP-E 65
Macro Twin Flash MT-24EX, 430 EX II & 270 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eaglesnest
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
189 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Oct 31, 2011 06:58 |  #6

Martin G. wrote in post #13330016 (external link)
go in "preferences" and than "memory usage", mine is set 4605 megabytes allocated for Zerene.

yes, it would appear long, I thought you meant for the whole stack.

not sure if it will make a difference, but try to modify this setting first and see what it does.

Martin

* Does it mean that you have 4 Gigs RAM on your computer? I only have 2 Gigs. That might be the reason.
I tried to stack using CS5, but the result is rather poor compare to Zerene.


www.eaglesnestphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ G.
Goldmember
Avatar
2,247 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2009
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
     
Oct 31, 2011 11:40 as a reply to  @ eaglesnest's post |  #7

I have 6 gig in total

Maybe e-mail Rik, the designer of the program, he would be the best person to answer your questions and if it would actually make a difference. He is very helpful and always take time to help.

Martin


6D & 70D
EF 24-105 L, EF 40mm, EF 85mm f1.8, EF 100mm L IS, MP-E 65
Macro Twin Flash MT-24EX, 430 EX II & 270 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjlittlefield
Mostly Lurking
19 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Nov 11, 2011 10:25 as a reply to  @ Martin G.'s post |  #8

Just to close out this problem and maybe help future readers...

The slowness was due to excessive paging caused by a memory management issue. Basically the user's computer had less physical memory free for use than is typical with 2 GB installed. The problem was straightforward to fix by adjusting the Zerene Stacker settings at Options > Preferences > Memory Usage.

Martin, thanks for the suggestion to contact me. That's always good advice when people see odd behavior with Zerene Stacker. I can't monitor all the forums where ZS is discussed, but I do respond promptly and thoroughly to any issues that I find out about. Email sent to upport@zerenesystems.c​om (external link) always comes to my personal attention.

Best regards,
Rik Littlefield
Zerene Systems




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fotoray
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Glendale, CA
     
Nov 22, 2011 12:05 |  #9

eaglesnest wrote in post #13328641 (external link)
I download Trial Zerene Stacker software to try out. The result is good; but it is so slow. To analyze and process 1 image took 5-10 min. What did I do wrong? it's not the computer. I have no problem with other programs such as Photomatix, PtGui, Topaz etc. Is there any other stacker software besides Zerene? I would like to try and compare the processing time.

Suggest trying Helicon Focus.


Canon 5D MkIII | 7D | 20D | EF-S 10-22 | EF 17-40L | EF-S 17-85 | EF 24-105L | EF 70-300 DO | EF-S 60mm macro | EF 100L macro | 580EX II | RRS Series 2 tripod | plus many gadgets |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,987 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Stacker Software
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1071 guests, 186 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.