Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 31 Oct 2011 (Monday) 12:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Anyone using More Powerful Flash than 580?

 
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Nov 01, 2011 13:39 as a reply to  @ post 13337928 |  #31

These were shot 2 weddings ago with the lighting set up i showed you. I have done nothing to these except cropping and a curves adjustment in lightroom. Taking strobes on location has cut my post processing time By 1/3. You cant get this lighting with speedlights.

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_1283.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_1276.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_1266.jpg


IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_1244.jpg

Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
btmlinedan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,559 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Apr 2009
Location: ohio
     
Nov 01, 2011 15:24 |  #32

great balance, i don't see any shadows. how did you light the 4th shot?


*dan l *Flickr (external link) l *cars: dkfx Photography (external link) l weddings: Blue Martini Photography (external link) l YN622C tranceiver review (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Nov 01, 2011 18:52 |  #33

btmlinedan wrote in post #13338521 (external link)
great balance, i don't see any shadows. how did you light the 4th shot?

2 Softboxes with AB 1600's

1st was pointed right at them about 20 degrees to Right of bride

2nd was about 40 degree to grooms left arm. Light filled in the shadow from the main light on bride. If you look close, you can see it.

I actually screwed up on the 2nd shot and forgot to transfer the circular when i switched lens. Thats why the shy washed a little. It could have been better so i will have to fix it in post.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wdwpsu
Senior Member
625 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Nov 02, 2011 14:32 |  #34

I recently tried 2 Einsteins with Vagabond Minis on lightstands, pocketwizards, and softboxes for outdoor portraits between the ceremony and reception...

It may be something I get better with in time, but I found the setup and tear down of the setup was very time consuming. It also prevented me from being as mobile as I normally would be. And, that's taking in to account that I had 1 lighting assistant.

There was also a bit more of test exposures as I set up. Again, this would improve in practice. But, I felt that I wasted a bit of everyone's time.


Wedding and Event Photography ∙ Orlando, Florida ∙ DSWfoto.com (external link)
Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Nov 02, 2011 14:40 |  #35

^That is my concern. I feel that way just with 1 Einstein and VML. Never mind 2 of them!
Don't know how you guys do it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigarchi
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
     
Nov 02, 2011 15:00 |  #36

wdwpsu wrote in post #13343487 (external link)
It may be something I get better with in time, but I found the setup and tear down of the setup was very time consuming. It also prevented me from being as mobile as I normally would be. And, that's taking in to account that I had 1 lighting assistant.

i haven't done this a lot, but it is really only one set up and one take down per shoot.

i set it all up before they even arrive, and take it down after they even leave if it is an e-shoot or something.

all that happens while the client is even around was to carry it and move it.
and i'm pretty sure you'd have to do that with any other type of artificial lighting or a reflector or anything

even in a wedding scenario, it usually takes a limo full of drunk a-holes more time to get out of the limo than it does set up a light stand with a vml, strobe and trigger.

another thing i've learned is that if i'm ever really nervous about getting to a park ahead of a bridal party, i talk to the limo driver
they can take the long way or drive slow or anything to give you a few extra minutes.


~Mitch

my gear and feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 02, 2011 15:43 |  #37

Having an assistant makes it much easier. You can often also set things up in advance, i'll sometimes arrive before the wedding to do the reception setup. That's rare though, as I can have my assistant do the setup during the downtime.

Sometimes we don't get to the reception until the same time as the B&G. In that case I tell them I need 5-10 minutes to set up, they can either wait for me to do it, or the photos won't be as good until it's done.

Planning and having an assistant really are the keys.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Nov 02, 2011 17:28 |  #38

wdwpsu wrote in post #13343487 (external link)
I recently tried 2 Einsteins with Vagabond Minis on lightstands, pocketwizards, and softboxes for outdoor portraits between the ceremony and reception...

It may be something I get better with in time, but I found the setup and tear down of the setup was very time consuming. It also prevented me from being as mobile as I normally would be. And, that's taking in to account that I had 1 lighting assistant.

There was also a bit more of test exposures as I set up. Again, this would improve in practice. But, I felt that I wasted a bit of everyone's time.

You will get faster as you put this into your routine. Honestly, its 4-5 mins and im ready to go. I have my wife with me so thats a huge help. We both grab a stand and a softbox. I leave the lights on the stands and they lay down inside my car. Its very quick. A Lightmeter really helps and i have one with me most of the time. But like all of you, after you have done this enough, you get pretty good at guessing a starting point and you chimp and dial it in if you dont have a meter with you.

Full sun,,,you know your gonna be at F/16- full power on light

partial sun/shade--Im gonna start at F9-10- 1/2 power to start

Light line-subject in full shade and full sun behind-- F/11-13,, 3/4 power
( this is where the Nd's bail you out and really make the light pop )

full shade-- Im gonna start at F/4.0- 1/4 power or less

These are my starting points and I can chimp and get myself ready to go pretty quick

Viewfinder is your friend and I ALWAYS shoot with my histogram showing....its not that hard once you get a routine down. Biggest thing i find helps is zoom the viewfinder in so you can tell if the light is too bright on the Skin and Look for hot spots on the skin. can Be deceiving and hard to to see in bright light. Got home more than once and had it a tad too bright but that has just about stopped.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 02, 2011 18:31 |  #39

I worry about the same issue, but I do work with an assistant and they'll end up being a little more busy than in the past.

What I can't imagine doing is going on long marches with them. My favorite location for engagement shoots is the local botanical garden; lots of great spots all over a large park. But man, marching round with one of these things is going to be tough. And I only use assistants on weddings, not e-shoots.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 02, 2011 18:35 |  #40

Also, FWIW, I've nearly decided on what I'm going with: AB1600, Vagabond Mini, and and one of the large PML's with a white cover. I can see using it without the cover often as I'm not so sure a 640w/s light is really going to be bright enough to compete with the sun so that light is going to need all the help it can get.

My alternative was the 1320w/s White Lightning, but that light is quite a bit heavier and seems less portable to me. That and a 7 sec recharge on the Vagabond makes it not an ideal choice. I'm just not willing/ready to spend the bigger money on something like rangers or speedotrons.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigarchi
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
     
Nov 02, 2011 18:52 |  #41

Peacefield wrote in post #13344633 (external link)
Also, FWIW, I've nearly decided on what I'm going with: AB1600, Vagabond Mini, and and one of the large PML's with a white cover. I can see using it without the cover often as I'm not so sure a 640w/s light is really going to be bright enough to compete with the sun so that light is going to need all the help it can get.

My alternative was the 1320w/s White Lightning, but that light is quite a bit heavier and seems less portable to me. That and a 7 sec recharge on the Vagabond makes it not an ideal choice. I'm just not willing/ready to spend the bigger money on something like rangers or speedotrons.

i have a 64" PLM but i can't imagine using it out on location like pham does because it's a huge ass sail imho
maybe i'll get more comfortable using it with an assistant over time, but as of yet i've been pretty hesitant.


~Mitch

my gear and feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 02, 2011 19:06 |  #42

I have AB800s, i'm going to get the vagabond mini - thanks Bob for offering to ship one over!

I think a small soft box or even an umbrella would be a better idea for portable use. I expect i'll mostly be using it bare, because the whole reason for getting it is I want more power than one or even two 580s can provide. I don't see any problem with my assistant putting the vagabond over her shoulder, holding the light perhaps on a monopod, and pulling along my rolling case... though I may have to help her out or sometimes even have my second assistant come along for part of the day. Even better i'll just co-opt someone from the wedding who looks friendly and willing to help!


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Nov 02, 2011 19:27 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #43

Shot this with a 64" PLM.....they are Awesome for location work but you better have no wind and you still need someone holding it in case someone farts:lol: If i could take one out evertime I had the chance I would

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_1972-Edit.jpg

IMAGE: http://i195.photobucket.com/albums/z19/karenbaby12/IMG_1911-Edit-1.jpg

Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 03, 2011 07:24 |  #44

bigarchi wrote in post #13344712 (external link)
i have a 64" PLM but i can't imagine using it out on location like pham does because it's a huge ass sail imho
maybe i'll get more comfortable using it with an assistant over time, but as of yet i've been pretty hesitant.

I'm amply apprehensive about the wind/sail issue. I'd only use it with the help of an assitant and still then only with little or no wind. I plan to get something else, maybe a Westcott Orb, or maybe a socked BD as an alternative. And, of course, the stock reflector when that's my only reasonable choice owing to wind or the absence of an assistant.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigarchi
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
     
Nov 03, 2011 08:13 |  #45

Peacefield wrote in post #13346959 (external link)
I'm amply apprehensive about the wind/sail issue. I'd only use it with the help of an assitant and still then only with little or no wind. I plan to get something else, maybe a Westcott Orb, or maybe a socked BD as an alternative. And, of course, the stock reflector when that's my only reasonable choice owing to wind or the absence of an assistant.

yeah, i think that's a great plan.
i love my BD for on site work fwiw. wish i had gotten it and the vml earlier :)


~Mitch

my gear and feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,432 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Anyone using More Powerful Flash than 580?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1036 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.