Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Nov 2011 (Tuesday) 16:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Film/Negative Scanner

 
wysiwyg59
Senior Member
Avatar
308 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southern MN
     
Nov 01, 2011 16:40 |  #1

I have hundreds/thousands of 35mm negatives from my high school years to 2003 when I converted to digital. I'm wondering shat scanner be good to use to convert them to digital.

Thanks.


Rick
Canon A1,6D2 7D2, 40D, Canon G12, Sony NEX-5N
Canon 70-200 IS F2.8 L, Canon 35mm f1.4 L, Tamron 28-300, EF-S 18-200mm, EF-S 10-22mm
wysiwyg@hickorytech.ne​t (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,720 posts
Likes: 4045
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 01, 2011 16:47 |  #2

how much effort do you want to put into it and what are you willing to pay. A dedicated negative scanner does the best job but they can be costly. Some of the flatbed scanners, like the Epson v500, V600, V700 or the Canoscan 8800 do a fine job with negatives as well.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wysiwyg59
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
308 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southern MN
     
Nov 01, 2011 16:52 |  #3

I got a new B&H catalog today and noticed a scanner for $90.00 that converts negatives to a 7.3mp file. Just wondering if it is worth it.


Rick
Canon A1,6D2 7D2, 40D, Canon G12, Sony NEX-5N
Canon 70-200 IS F2.8 L, Canon 35mm f1.4 L, Tamron 28-300, EF-S 18-200mm, EF-S 10-22mm
wysiwyg@hickorytech.ne​t (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
Avatar
4,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2008
     
Nov 01, 2011 16:57 |  #4

wysiwyg59 wrote in post #13338961 (external link)
Just wondering if it is worth it.

That entirely depends on what you're looking for.

If you're looking for 600px long scans that tell you what the picture is and don't care about the quality, it will do a fine job. If you're looking for images on-par with today's digital cameras, it's going to be far less than adequate.


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 01, 2011 17:26 |  #5

wysiwyg59 wrote in post #13338961 (external link)
I got a new B&H catalog today and noticed a scanner for $90.00 that converts negatives to a 7.3mp file. Just wondering if it is worth it.

A 7.3 MP image will definitely not deliver the potential IQ of a negative.

I'd suggest you consider what you can afford, then find one that meets that limit.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Nov 01, 2011 17:34 |  #6
bannedPermanently

The Minolta Dimage is a reasonably decent 35mm scanner and can be had used for $300 and under. It allows batch scans of 4 slides or 6 negatives. Scanning thousands of slides is a lot of work.

Here's an image of one they can found on Ebay. Make sure the auction includes everything. I had the II version and it worked fine.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_DiMAGE_Scan_Du​al_IV.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,720 posts
Likes: 4045
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 01, 2011 17:39 |  #7

jetcode wrote in post #13339144 (external link)
The Minolta Dimage i

I thought they discontinued that series quite some time back. Even your link shows as no longer available. Most i see online are sold as-is for parts and repairs.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,422 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4513
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 01, 2011 17:43 |  #8

Many dedicated film scanners which are NOT flatbed scanners were discontinued, like the Nikon line was one of the best, and they are no longer made.

Keep in mind that film scanning is quite time consuming per shot, and also is quite labor intensive in terms of cleaning and prepping each negative/slide!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
"spouting off stupid things"
Avatar
57,720 posts
Likes: 4045
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Nov 01, 2011 17:50 |  #9

It is a labor of love. I have been scanning my family pictures for the last 2 years on and off. I have several hundred restored. As wilt said, it is time consuming not only to scan them but also to restore them as some are in sad shape.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 02, 2011 08:00 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #10

I have a Super COOLSCAN 9000 ED (external link) scanner. It does a great job but it didn't come cheap. From what I understand they are not manufacturing this anymore but you can still find them online. Have you considered sending your negatives and slides to a scanning service such as Scan Cafe (external link). I know several people who have used this specific service and were very happy with the results.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wysiwyg59
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
308 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Southern MN
     
Nov 02, 2011 10:01 as a reply to  @ ssim's post |  #11

I had National Camera Exchange scann our Hawaii pictures from 2000 and they charged us over $200 for 7 rolls. I thought that is high verses doing them myself


Rick
Canon A1,6D2 7D2, 40D, Canon G12, Sony NEX-5N
Canon 70-200 IS F2.8 L, Canon 35mm f1.4 L, Tamron 28-300, EF-S 18-200mm, EF-S 10-22mm
wysiwyg@hickorytech.ne​t (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 02, 2011 12:10 |  #12

wysiwyg59 wrote in post #13342145 (external link)
I had National Camera Exchange scann our Hawaii pictures from 2000 and they charged us over $200 for 7 rolls. I thought that is high verses doing them myself

Heh! I can certainly understand that -- I've got all my film negatives in shoeboxes buried in storage somewhere, and I don't entertain the idea of shelling out hundres of dollars on scanning the "keepers".

But, you do have to realize that you are paying for Time and, presumably for Quality delivered not just by the skill of the person but also the quality of the equipment used. You can figure time for a skilled worker can cost, say, $50/hr...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Nov 02, 2011 14:08 |  #13

A good scanner will cost you several hundred dollars and months of work, if you're fast. Send them to scan cafe and pay to have it done, it's much more cost effective and much faster!

When I used scan cafe they sent the negatives to (I think..) India for scanning, and I was a bit worried about losing them in the mail, but I had no problems at all. I sent them in batches to be safe. You can actually see the image online and choose which ones you want and the resolution.


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBurningCrown
Goldmember
Avatar
4,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2008
     
Nov 02, 2011 22:15 |  #14

ShotByTom wrote in post #13343374 (external link)
A good scanner will cost you several hundred dollars and months of work, if you're fast. Send them to scan cafe and pay to have it done, it's much more cost effective and much faster!

Fast|Good Quality|Cheap

Choose two :).


-Dave
Gear List & Feedback
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kampers
Member
59 posts
Joined Jun 2010
     
Dec 12, 2011 18:15 |  #15

I had the same problem and was going to use my HP 4800 scanner to get the job done. Job being to scan hundreds of color slides that contain my dads pictures of the family. The HP software was horible and the scanning process was so slow I about fell asleep waiting for the scans to complete. And trying to seperate the 4 slides from each other was hard for me to figure out.

I needed something simple and fast.

So I saw the ION Film 2 SD 35mm Flilm & Slide Scanner at Best Buy and bought one.

I was able to scan all my slides in two days and put them all onto a 2 GB SD chip. The scans are automatic and fast. They work great for displaying the pictures on a computer monitor. I'm not going to print them out so this works fine for my use.

I can import them into my computer and use photo shop elements 9 to edit them if I need to.

No computer is required to use this scanner.

It will also scan negatives as well as color slides. There is a slide feeder that will hold half a box of slides. All my dads pictures were taken back in the 1950's, 60's and 70's when I was young.

Just last month my mom's sister died. I was able to go though our family slides and find pictures of my aunt and her kids and husband. I was able to scan them into my computer and sent them to my cousins in Pennsylvania via Email. They had not seen these pictures in the last 40 years and were very happy to get copies of these pictures of their mom when she was young.

The resolution of the scans is 5 MP. Works with SD or SDHC up to 8 GB in size.

I was very pleased with the results.

The only problem I had was dust on the scanners light box. They include a cleaning tool that can be used to clean the dust off the inside of the scanner. But the dust keeps coming back. I guess the house needs some dusting again with a HEPA vaccume cleaner.

If you want to get the job done and don't need 600 dpi print out then I'd recommend this scanner.

Cost was a little over $100.


Canon EOS Rebel T2i
55-250 Zoom EF-S
18 to 55 Zoom EF-S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,316 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Film/Negative Scanner
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1238 guests, 184 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.