I have hundreds/thousands of 35mm negatives from my high school years to 2003 when I converted to digital. I'm wondering shat scanner be good to use to convert them to digital.
Thanks.
Nov 01, 2011 16:40 | #1 I have hundreds/thousands of 35mm negatives from my high school years to 2003 when I converted to digital. I'm wondering shat scanner be good to use to convert them to digital. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Nov 01, 2011 16:47 | #2 how much effort do you want to put into it and what are you willing to pay. A dedicated negative scanner does the best job but they can be costly. Some of the flatbed scanners, like the Epson v500, V600, V700 or the Canoscan 8800 do a fine job with negatives as well. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 01, 2011 16:52 | #3 I got a new B&H catalog today and noticed a scanner for $90.00 that converts negatives to a 7.3mp file. Just wondering if it is worth it. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Nov 01, 2011 16:57 | #4 wysiwyg59 wrote in post #13338961 Just wondering if it is worth it. That entirely depends on what you're looking for. -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Nov 01, 2011 17:26 | #5 wysiwyg59 wrote in post #13338961 I got a new B&H catalog today and noticed a scanner for $90.00 that converts negatives to a 7.3mp file. Just wondering if it is worth it. A 7.3 MP image will definitely not deliver the potential IQ of a negative. Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jetcode Cream of the Crop 6,235 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: West Marin More info | Nov 01, 2011 17:34 | #6 PermanentlyThe Minolta Dimage is a reasonably decent 35mm scanner and can be had used for $300 and under. It allows batch scans of 4 slides or 6 negatives. Scanning thousands of slides is a lot of work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Nov 01, 2011 17:39 | #7 jetcode wrote in post #13339144 The Minolta Dimage i I thought they discontinued that series quite some time back. Even your link shows as no longer available. Most i see online are sold as-is for parts and repairs. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Nov 01, 2011 17:43 | #8 Many dedicated film scanners which are NOT flatbed scanners were discontinued, like the Nikon line was one of the best, and they are no longer made. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Nov 01, 2011 17:50 | #9 It is a labor of love. I have been scanning my family pictures for the last 2 years on and off. I have several hundred restored. As wilt said, it is time consuming not only to scan them but also to restore them as some are in sad shape. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005 10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | I have a Super COOLSCAN 9000 ED My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I had National Camera Exchange scann our Hawaii pictures from 2000 and they charged us over $200 for 7 rolls. I thought that is high verses doing them myself Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Nov 02, 2011 12:10 | #12 wysiwyg59 wrote in post #13342145 I had National Camera Exchange scann our Hawaii pictures from 2000 and they charged us over $200 for 7 rolls. I thought that is high verses doing them myself Heh! I can certainly understand that -- I've got all my film negatives in shoeboxes buried in storage somewhere, and I don't entertain the idea of shelling out hundres of dollars on scanning the "keepers". Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 02, 2011 14:08 | #13 A good scanner will cost you several hundred dollars and months of work, if you're fast. Send them to scan cafe and pay to have it done, it's much more cost effective and much faster!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheBurningCrown Goldmember 4,882 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2008 More info | Nov 02, 2011 22:15 | #14 ShotByTom wrote in post #13343374 A good scanner will cost you several hundred dollars and months of work, if you're fast. Send them to scan cafe and pay to have it done, it's much more cost effective and much faster! Fast|Good Quality|Cheap -Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kampers Member 59 posts Joined Jun 2010 More info | Dec 12, 2011 18:15 | #15 I had the same problem and was going to use my HP 4800 scanner to get the job done. Job being to scan hundreds of color slides that contain my dads pictures of the family. The HP software was horible and the scanning process was so slow I about fell asleep waiting for the scans to complete. And trying to seperate the 4 slides from each other was hard for me to figure out. Canon EOS Rebel T2i
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1257 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||