Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 01 Nov 2011 (Tuesday) 19:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Pics in the Park - Need Critical C/C

 
GlimmerMan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,975 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9350
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Nov 01, 2011 19:08 |  #1

A few of the wifey from the park this weekend. We enjoyed some hot chocolate and then she let me take some shots. Natural light with reflector. We'd appreciate some critical C&C. I think these are decent, but what will make them better? Also, she's a bit picky about #3 but I think her form is fine. Thanks,

1. T1i. 67mm. f4.0 @ 1/125s. ISO 100 (auto). Aperture Mode.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


2. T1i. 67mm. f4.0 @ 1/125s. ISO 100 (auto). Aperture Mode.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


3. T1i. 65mm. f5.6 @ 1/100s. ISO 250 (auto). Aperture Mode.
IMAGE: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6213/6296008489_372efd7e8a_z.jpg

4. T1i. 105mm. f/7.1 @ 1/160. ISO 320 (auto). Aperture Mode.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

X100T XT3
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpam.pix
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2011
     
Nov 01, 2011 20:04 |  #2

Some thoughts...
1. Colors and contrast look fine. I'd go for different framing. I would prefer that the top of her head wasn't cut off and that there was less negative space on the left of the picture.
2. A little too orange for my preference. Cool it down a bit.
3. I like the posing and composition. Great work. I'd like more contrast and less of the white spot on her leg.
4. Nice colors and setting. She and the dog are reeeealllly small and have a hard time holding my interest. Just too hard for me to stay engaged.


1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
70-200L, 28-70L, 24-105L, 300L, 50, 10-17 fish, 2.0x TC
Image editing OK, encouraged, and expected. Thank you for helping me learn!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjc1
Senior Member
Avatar
553 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 01, 2011 20:10 |  #3

I think the subject could use a little more light on her. In the first pic the background is lighter and my eye is drawn to it. The second bothersome nitpik is that the top of head has been cut off.
The second pic is much better regarding light on the subject, but I would have liked it better if she had put her right arm down to her side.
The third pic same as first, could use a little more light on subject or more of a blurred background. Something to create more separation.( or it could be the processing ).
The last pic is nice. Too far away to know if it's your wife.


40D with 28-135 IS , Tamron 17-50 ,100-400 f4.5-5.6L, 100mm f2.8L macro IS, 430EX, 430EXll,MiniTT1/FlexTT​5 , Kata R-103,
Domke F2 shooters bag

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,975 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9350
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Nov 02, 2011 06:21 as a reply to  @ rjc1's post |  #4

Many thanks RJ and CPAM. I'll need to work with that reflector a bit more. And maybe I can use the last pic to make my case for a 70-200.... It's almost Christmas time. -Thanks,


X100T XT3
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Goldmember
Avatar
1,062 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2008
Location: UK
     
Nov 02, 2011 08:00 |  #5

#1 has potential. Shame she has her body turned out of the frame with so much empty space behind. Would have been better if she'd turned the other way. There's flare which distracts. Hair and shoulder rather too bright, takes the eye away from her face - which shows a nice smile/natural expression. Brighten her eyes a tad, not a bad pic.
#2 and #3 don't really work for me. She looks uncomfortable. Difficult when your subject isn't used to posing. There's a nice tree stump in the background, did you get her seated on that? Often seating your model helps them relax, gives you an opportunity to shoot from higher. The color isn't right, either. It also looks like she didn't go dressed for being photoed, if you know what I mean.
I like #4 as a lifestyle shot, but she is a bit small in the frame. If you'd taken more of her as she got nearer, you might have got a few natural full lengths.


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mistabernie
'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'..
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2010
Location: south of Boston, MA
     
Nov 02, 2011 08:03 |  #6

I've been on a very nostalgic kick lately and really like the processing in #3 personally. One tip - if your wife doesn't like number 3, try shooting downward slightly towards her instead of essentially on level with her hands. Nice captures.


Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug (external link) | Gear List & POTN Marketplace Feedback
Feel free to call me Bernie.
LIVING PROOF WHY YOU DON'T MENTION THE TITLE FAIRY...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,975 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9350
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Nov 02, 2011 17:13 |  #7

Hannya wrote in post #13341627 (external link)
#1 has potential. Shame she has her body turned out of the frame with so much empty space behind. Would have been better if she'd turned the other way.

Very astute, and thanks. I though the part I missed was angling her body away from the light and then having her look back towards the light, but I missed the basic composition of having her turn into the frame.

Mistabernie wrote in post #13341639 (external link)
One tip - if your wife doesn't like number 3, try shooting downward slightly towards her instead of essentially on level with her hands. Nice captures.

Much appreciated. Looks like with all those tree stumps around that I had a great, natural ladder a few feet away. Doh!


X100T XT3
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johndoorley
Senior Member
364 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2011
     
Nov 02, 2011 19:53 |  #8

#1 and 3 suggest a lens hood, or shade the glass with your hand to avoid the sunspots

Very pretty lady!

# 1 could crop off left side to be tighter on her face!

Keep shooting, looking good!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 03, 2011 01:25 |  #9

Hannya wrote in post #13341627 (external link)
#1 has potential. Shame she has her body turned out of the frame with so much empty space behind. Would have been better if she'd turned the other way. There's flare which distracts. Hair and shoulder rather too bright, takes the eye away from her face - which shows a nice smile/natural expression. Brighten her eyes a tad, not a bad pic.
#2 and #3 don't really work for me. She looks uncomfortable. Difficult when your subject isn't used to posing. There's a nice tree stump in the background, did you get her seated on that? Often seating your model helps them relax, gives you an opportunity to shoot from higher. The color isn't right, either. It also looks like she didn't go dressed for being photoed, if you know what I mean.
I like #4 as a lifestyle shot, but she is a bit small in the frame. If you'd taken more of her as she got nearer, you might have got a few natural full lengths.

I agree with all of this - Hannya has given a great critique for you.

#2 & #3 are not doing anything for your wife. She has a great smile ini #1

Not sure what's going on color/tone wise in #2  but something looks off - moreso in #3 than #2. #2 is an awkward pose.

Some good shots with great exposure.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HenryLee
Senior Member
Avatar
276 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Socal
     
Nov 03, 2011 01:38 |  #10

great shots.


5D Mark II / 24-105mm L / 430EX II
Canon Rebel K2 / 50mm 1.8 / 35-80mm
Canon Powershot SD750 / FujiFilm Instax Mini 7S (polaroid)
Previous: 60D, 7D, 50D, 40D, XSI, XS, Rebel X (film), 17-40mm L, 15-85mm, 55-250mm, Tamron 17-50mm, Sigma 17-70mm, 28-135mm, 17-85mm, 18-55mm, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mistabernie
'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'..
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2010
Location: south of Boston, MA
     
Nov 03, 2011 15:39 |  #11

whoa, I just realized the color difference between the first and the others (I must have been pretty tired when I initially checked them out). The clothing really points it out -- while it's not a huge deal for the clothing, when I look at the skin tonal values between the two, I'm really partial towards the first.


Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug (external link) | Gear List & POTN Marketplace Feedback
Feel free to call me Bernie.
LIVING PROOF WHY YOU DON'T MENTION THE TITLE FAIRY...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,975 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9350
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Nov 03, 2011 17:56 |  #12

Many thanks for all your comments. No need for anything more; I've got a lot to practice. I did reprocess (2) of the shots; hope you like 'em.

#1 had the white reflector.

#2 had the gold reflector and it's really bleeding into the skin tone. I've pulled back the red and orange but this is about the best I can see.


New_1. T1i. 67mm. f4.0 @ 1/125s. ISO 100 (auto). Aperture Mode. Lightroom 3.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


New_2. T1i. 67mm. f4.0 @ 1/125s. ISO 100 (auto). Aperture Mode. Lightroom 3.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

X100T XT3
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,286 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Pics in the Park - Need Critical C/C
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1477 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.