Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 05 Nov 2011 (Saturday) 09:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How do you light your events? ETTL or manual? How many lights?

 
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 05, 2011 09:36 |  #1

If you are shooting an event that takes place at a venue where the ambient light does not change, such as at a banquet hall, what is your strategy for lighting?

Do you use one light or two? If one, do you keep the flash on a bracket above camera or is it off camera? If off camera, do you keep it stationary on a stand or have an assistant move it around? If two lights, I'd assume one is on a bracket, and the same question applies for the other - stationary or mobile? If it's stationary, do you use it as a rim light or position it as a key light and try to get shots when people have their faces turned at a good angle?

Also, there's the question of ETTL. Do you find the pre-flash to increase blinking in your shots? Do you use hotshoe flashes or studio lights? Does anyone use a combination of hotshoe and studio lights?

I apologize for having so many questions in one thread, but I'm hoping those of you with experience can answer most or all of them. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 05, 2011 10:30 |  #2

Tim has a link, it might even be a sticky, on how he uses multiple flashes to light a venue. Some take that approach, others prefer to work with higher ISO and an on-camera flash that's bounced (which is my approach). They each have their advantages and disadvantages; it just depends on you're style, both with respect to imagery and the way you like to work.

I use one light most of the time, but will use a second for special situations: a little back lighting during the first dance, some kicker lighting during the toast, the bouquet toss with one light for the bride and the other for the ladies, etc. But one flash most of the time.

I never noticed a change in the rate of blinking over the pre-flash. That said, I gave up on ETTL quite a while ago for M and am much happier. I'll still use ETTL for dynamic situations, but my shots are so much better, my exposure is so much more consistent, and my PP goes so much more quickly now that I shoot almost exclusively with my flash(es) in M.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 05, 2011 12:12 |  #3

Peacefield wrote in post #13357233 (external link)
Tim has a link, it might even be a sticky, on how he uses multiple flashes to light a venue. Some take that approach, others prefer to work with higher ISO and an on-camera flash that's bounced (which is my approach). They each have their advantages and disadvantages; it just depends on you're style, both with respect to imagery and the way you like to work.

I've read all of Tim's how-to threads - very informative. And I agree that where one needs to be very mobile, a single on-camera flash might be a good approach. But since its role would be limited to fill, I wonder how useful it is when the dynamic range indoors is not usually greater than the camera's sensor.

Peacefield wrote in post #13357233 (external link)
I never noticed a change in the rate of blinking over the pre-flash. That said, I gave up on ETTL quite a while ago for M and am much happier. I'll still use ETTL for dynamic situations, but my shots are so much better, my exposure is so much more consistent, and my PP goes so much more quickly now that I shoot almost exclusively with my flash(es) in M.

Thanks for your perspective Robert. One of my goals is to do as little PP as possible, and I think there are many things that one can do to reduce it. What is it that they say? An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 05, 2011 18:32 |  #4

You've probably read this thread, but I do more or less the same thing at every venue.

If you want on camera flash only, and the light is even, then use manual camera and ETTL flash.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 05, 2011 21:27 |  #5

Yes, I've read that Tim. I've seen photographers use direct flash only at weddings, and I've also see some use a hotshoe flash with a monolight/umbrella bounced on the ceiling. I'll be trying various techniques when I do some event photography as well, but my goal is to somehow approach the results that I'm getting in studio. Granted, the quality in an unpredictable environment will never match that of a predictable and controllable one, but I'd like to try.

I think that if I really want to create an optimal lighting pattern in event photos, I would really need an assistant to carry a light around that would act as key. And my on-camera flash would act as fill. I'm thinking that some smaller modifiers would work here, such as the Demb Flip-it! When getting a particular shot is very critical, such as at a wedding, I can understand that this would not be a feasible strategy. But for a more common social event, I would imagine that this could be done very effectively.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StephenAndrew
Senior Member
Avatar
855 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Nov 06, 2011 01:00 |  #6

I just started using two strobes about 5 weddings ago, so I'm no expert (yet) but the results have been awesome so far. What I've been doing is setting them up on light stands ideally in opposite corners of the room, but anyplace that's out of the way of doors, guests, tables/chairs, etc. is good. Depending on the color of the walls/ceilings, I'll either point them up and bounce the light off them, or if they're colored, I'll point them directly towards the center of the room. I just use small reflectors on the strobes, no big modifiers like umbrellas since they can be an eyesore. I have a wireless transmitter connected via the pc port, and a hot shoe mounted flash for fill light, so all three lights fire when I press the shutter. Depending on the room size, ceiling height, and how close guests are sitting to the strobes (I don't want to blast them with too much light), the ISO is around 200-400, instead of 2000-3200 if I used the on-camera speedlite alone. The off camera lighting definitely gives more depth and dimension to the photos in an otherwise dark room, and the lower ISO makes them look a lot cleaner. As an added bonus, you can use longer lenses than you normally would to get some nice, tight shots inconspicuously, since you don't have to worry as much about the reach of the shoe mounted flash with the strobes firing. Definitely recommend off-camera lighting - takes more planning, time, and effort, but totally worth it.


Connecticut Wedding and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Equipment/Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 06, 2011 01:29 |  #7

frugivore wrote in post #13359146 (external link)
Yes, I've read that Tim. I've seen photographers use direct flash only at weddings, and I've also see some use a hotshoe flash with a monolight/umbrella bounced on the ceiling. I'll be trying various techniques when I do some event photography as well, but my goal is to somehow approach the results that I'm getting in studio. Granted, the quality in an unpredictable environment will never match that of a predictable and controllable one, but I'd like to try.

I think that if I really want to create an optimal lighting pattern in event photos, I would really need an assistant to carry a light around that would act as key. And my on-camera flash would act as fill. I'm thinking that some smaller modifiers would work here, such as the Demb Flip-it! When getting a particular shot is very critical, such as at a wedding, I can understand that this would not be a feasible strategy. But for a more common social event, I would imagine that this could be done very effectively.

You need to light the whole room, to avoid black hole backgrounds.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 06, 2011 07:42 |  #8

tim wrote in post #13359757 (external link)
You need to light the whole room, to avoid black hole backgrounds.

Got it Tim. And I know that the other options to avoid the black hole is to use fast glass. I guess I'll try using a couple of monolights.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 06, 2011 13:49 |  #9

frugivore wrote in post #13360348 (external link)
Got it Tim. And I know that the other options to avoid the black hole is to use fast glass. I guess I'll try using a couple of monolights.

Fast glass isn't sufficient in most cases. In some wedding receptions i've had the ambient exposure is ISO3200, F2.8, 1/2 a second. F1.2 won't even cut it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 14, 2011 12:16 |  #10

One more question related to event shooting: If one were to use studio lights at an event, would this make high ISO and low shutter speed unnecessary? I find myself preferring primes, so I was thinking about how to use an 85mm or 135mm prime on an APS-C based body.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Nov 14, 2011 12:50 |  #11

frugivore wrote in post #13398099 (external link)
One more question related to event shooting: If one were to use studio lights at an event, would this make high ISO and low shutter speed unnecessary? I find myself preferring primes, so I was thinking about how to use an 85mm or 135mm prime on an APS-C based body.

I usually start off at 1/160, f2.8, ISO800. Last Friday, I was shooting my 85L wide open at ISO100.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Nov 14, 2011 13:02 |  #12

tim wrote in post #13361598 (external link)
Fast glass isn't sufficient in most cases. In some wedding receptions i've had the ambient exposure is ISO3200, F2.8, 1/2 a second. F1.2 won't even cut it.

Tim you are 100% correct. OH but you already knew that ;)


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Nov 14, 2011 13:08 |  #13

StephenAndrew wrote in post #13359690 (external link)
I just started using two strobes about 5 weddings ago, so I'm no expert (yet) but the results have been awesome so far. What I've been doing is setting them up on light stands ideally in opposite corners of the room, but anyplace that's out of the way of doors, guests, tables/chairs, etc. is good. Depending on the color of the walls/ceilings, I'll either point them up and bounce the light off them, or if they're colored, I'll point them directly towards the center of the room. I just use small reflectors on the strobes, no big modifiers like umbrellas since they can be an eyesore. I have a wireless transmitter connected via the pc port, and a hot shoe mounted flash for fill light, so all three lights fire when I press the shutter. Depending on the room size, ceiling height, and how close guests are sitting to the strobes (I don't want to blast them with too much light), the ISO is around 200-400, instead of 2000-3200 if I used the on-camera speedlite alone. The off camera lighting definitely gives more depth and dimension to the photos in an otherwise dark room, and the lower ISO makes them look a lot cleaner. As an added bonus, you can use longer lenses than you normally would to get some nice, tight shots inconspicuously, since you don't have to worry as much about the reach of the shoe mounted flash with the strobes firing. Definitely recommend off-camera lighting - takes more planning, time, and effort, but totally worth it.


What triggers are you using?


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Nov 14, 2011 13:14 |  #14

Don't know about Stephen, but I use CyberSync triggers. Einstein and B800 controlled via Cyber Commander. CST velcroed on a hot shoe mounted 580EXII and connected to the camera via pc sync cable. Works very well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Nov 14, 2011 13:38 |  #15

^ I use something similar.Unfortunatley the 580 EX does not have the PC synch. SOoooo I need to change triggers or upgrade to the 580EXII or have the 580 EX modded.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,445 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
How do you light your events? ETTL or manual? How many lights?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1306 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.