I haven't seen anything about the asteroid YU55 that will be close to us Nov. 8th and 9th. Will this be something that people will be able to shoot without >6" telescopes? Appears that it will not be visible with the naked eye or with binoculars.
jimboh Member 42 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Greenville,NC More info | Nov 07, 2011 10:47 | #1 I haven't seen anything about the asteroid YU55 that will be close to us Nov. 8th and 9th. Will this be something that people will be able to shoot without >6" telescopes? Appears that it will not be visible with the naked eye or with binoculars. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 07, 2011 12:43 | #2 At closest approach, a 10-inch or 12-inch telescope will be required to get sufficient signal even though shorter than normal exposures will be needed to avoid excessive trailing. You will have to experiment, but 10- to 30-second exposures will be the maximum near the closest approach. After November 11, a 14-inch telescope with 120- or 180- second exposures will probably be needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 07, 2011 14:14 | #3 Thanks Ron, I wish it was going to be more visible than it will be. Still a very interesting subject. I'll look forward to seeing the results of the project you cite. I know I don't have the needed equipment but I've been lurking and watching for the POTN crew to mention this asteroid and was surprised it has seemed to escape attention. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 07, 2011 21:22 | #4 jimboh wrote in post #13366510 Thanks Ron, I wish it was going to be more visible than it will be. Still a very interesting subject. I'll look forward to seeing the results of the project you cite. I know I don't have the needed equipment but I've been lurking and watching for the POTN crew to mention this asteroid and was surprised it has seemed to escape attention.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bbulldog Goldmember 1,158 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Germany but born in Woolwich, London More info | Nov 08, 2011 05:40 | #5 was too foggy here last night to see anything Canon EOS 50D gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2011 08:07 | #6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drumsfield Goldmember 1,601 posts Likes: 27 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Bethesda Md More info | Nov 08, 2011 12:10 | #7 You guys think a 100-400mm with a 2x converter will be able to video the asteroid? Canon 5D MkIII | Olympus OM-D | Olympus E-P2 | 16-35L MKII | 24-70L MKII | 70-200L MKII | 85L MKII | EF 50mm 1.4 | EF 100mm 2.8 | 100-400mm L MKII | 20mm 1.7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bulldogg7 Senior Member 469 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Henderson county, NC More info | Nov 08, 2011 18:21 | #8 |
bbulldog Goldmember 1,158 posts Likes: 8 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Germany but born in Woolwich, London More info | Nov 09, 2011 05:35 | #9 Im in Germany. I did not have time to look last night, was a clearer sky. Canon EOS 50D gripped
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1078 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||