charliechuck Member  188 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: nottingham uk More info | Nov 08, 2011 18:18 | #1 just two photo's of my friend jamie taken on saturday. used cs5 and lightroom 3  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrsmacdeezy Senior Member  314 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Gates, NC More info | Nov 08, 2011 19:49 | #2 |
You-by-Lou Goldmember  1,691 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Manhattan More info | Nov 08, 2011 20:12 | #3 yeah that second one looks like serious pro fashion photographer You may say I'm a Zoomer, But I'm not the only one
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2011 20:39 | #4 Number two is seriously good CANON 6D - SONY A6000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
russ71satellite Goldmember  More info | Nov 08, 2011 22:28 | #5 I like them both...very cute. Second one is stunning, though. Some may find it overprocessed, but it is beautiful nevertheless! Canon EOS 5D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.8, Yongnuo YN560II, Dynaphos strobe, 16 inch beauty dish, Vagabond mini.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nodin Senior Member 375 posts Joined Aug 2010 More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:02 | #6 second one is beautiful, very captivating.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pilipinophotography Member 157 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Nov 08, 2011 23:16 | #7 i think her eyes look odd in the first pic. did you do something to them? it looks like you cloned them and they're a little OOF. Canon 5DMII & 60D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2011 02:26 | #8 did not do anything to her eyes in the first one. second image was created with one click of a mouse button in lightroom 3. i used a free pre set that on down loaded of the internet took me 0.2 of a second to get the picture to look like it does.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ieetryce Junior Member  21 posts Joined Aug 2010 More info | Nov 09, 2011 02:54 | #9 2 is really good.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonTree Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Surrey UK More info | Love the second one!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gadiper Member 142 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: KY , Israel More info | Nov 09, 2011 03:57 | #11 I also think that #2 is amazingly good , what's not working so well in #1 is that the lighting doesn't create something interesting like in the second image FUJIFILM X-T1 / 18-55 2.8-4 / flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeteW Goldmember  More info | Nov 09, 2011 04:07 | #12 That second image is Awesome, great model, great pose and superb processing All the best
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 09, 2011 04:54 | #13 thanks for your feed back guy's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You-by-Lou Goldmember 1,691 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Manhattan More info | Nov 09, 2011 05:21 | #14 charliechuck wrote in post #13374463  did not do anything to her eyes in the first one. second image was created with one click of a mouse button in lightroom 3. i used a free pre set that on down loaded of the internet took me 0.2 of a second to get the picture to look like it does.
You may say I'm a Zoomer, But I'm not the only one
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You-by-Lou Goldmember 1,691 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Manhattan More info | Nov 09, 2011 05:22 | #15 pilipino photography wrote in post #13374060 i think her eyes look odd in the first pic. did you do something to them? it looks like you cloned them and they're a little OOF. the 2nd one is awesome! I'm guessing they were a pair You may say I'm a Zoomer, But I'm not the only one
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1059 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
