Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2011 (Saturday) 09:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7d to the 1d MK III - Upgrade or Sidegrade

 
fiveohmike
Senior Member
478 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 38
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 12, 2011 09:01 |  #1

Just wondering about this. After using a 1d MK IV from a buddy, I love love love the AF system on that camera, and the 10fps is nice for shooting sports.

Now, the question being - is the 1d MK III and upgrade in terms of ISO performance, AF performance, and mainly Image Quality?


5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Nov 12, 2011 09:06 |  #2

It's a 1.3 crop so it should handle ISO a little better.
But I consider it a side grade with the research I have done.
I have not used a 1d3 though. I have used a 7d and it was nice.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Nov 12, 2011 09:26 |  #3

When I was looking for a second camera, these are the 2 I was researching. IMO, it would be 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Too close for any meaningful difference.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Nov 12, 2011 09:29 as a reply to  @ jhayesvw's post |  #4

Maybe the IDsIII for landscape/still life, not the 1DIII. If you want a better body for landscape, portraits..etc....cons​ider adding a 5DII and keeping the 7D. Then you have a backup body is one dies, and you are prepared to capture the best of action or stills.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fiveohmike
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
478 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 38
Joined Jan 2010
     
Nov 12, 2011 10:01 |  #5

MCAsan wrote in post #13389742 (external link)
Maybe the IDsIII for landscape/still life, not the 1DIII. If you want a better body for landscape, portraits..etc....cons​ider adding a 5DII and keeping the 7D. Then you have a backup body is one dies, and you are prepared to capture the best of action or stills.

I have a 5d MK II ;) Looking on the sports side of things. I find my keeper rate went up significantly when I used my buddies 1d MK IV. Right now I cant justify 5k for a body, but ~2k for the 1d MK III, I can.


5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 100-400L II | 24-105L | 50MM f/1.4 | 85MM f/1.8 | Sigma 1.4x TC | 580EX II | 430EX II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NotASpeckOfCereal
Senior Member
Avatar
297 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Staly Vegas, UK
     
Nov 12, 2011 10:54 |  #6

fiveohmike wrote in post #13389855 (external link)
I have a 5d MK II ;) Looking on the sports side of things. I find my keeper rate went up significantly when I used my buddies 1d MK IV. Right now I cant justify 5k for a body, but ~2k for the 1d MK III, I can.

I swapped a 7d for a 1d3 - no regrets. IQ higher, ISO handling better, better AF and more keepers. I had a 1D2 previously, so going back to a 1 series was part of it for me. Having said that a 5D and a 1D3 would be a great combo....


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DennisW1
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Chicago, IL area
     
Nov 12, 2011 10:59 |  #7

jhayesvw wrote in post #13389661 (external link)
It's a 1.3 crop so it should handle ISO a little better.
But I consider it a side grade with the research I have done.
I have not used a 1d3 though. I have used a 7d and it was nice.

Depends on your use. I own both and the AF on the MkIII is definitely better, and faster.

Build, reliability, overall handling to me is just better with the 1D series body. The 7D is an awesome camera, for sure but I still find myself picking up the MkIII more often.

If you need or want video then the 7D is obviously your only choice, unless you have the $$$ for a MkIV

BTW, to the OP, I'm selling one of my MkIII bodies if you decide to go that route. PM me if interested.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whitesell
Senior Member
Avatar
361 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: St. Albert, AB Canada
     
Nov 12, 2011 11:04 as a reply to  @ DennisW1's post |  #8

I have both as well... and shoot much more often with the 1D mkIII. While the 7D is a great camera, I like the 1D better and love the results.

Regards,
Jim


Edmonton portrait photographer (external link)
Google Business Photos Edmonton (external link)
Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Nov 12, 2011 11:09 |  #9

From what I've found in looking into the 1D bodies, the 1D3 is mostly a lateral move from the 7D; the 1D4 would be a slight upgrade in most ways.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kyles
Senior Member
377 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2010
Location: USA
     
Nov 12, 2011 11:18 as a reply to  @ Snydremark's post |  #10

The 1Dmk3 would be my choice between the two, images are beautiful, built like a tank, great camera!

as mentioned, 1Dmk3 plus 5Dmk2 would be a winning combo!


Cameras - 1DMKIV - 1DMKII - 7D W/Grip
Primes - 100 F2.8 macro L - 135 F2 L - 300 F4 L
Zooms - 24-70 F2.8 L - 70-200 F2.8 L - 70-200 F4 L
Tripod - RRS TVC 33 - RRS BH55

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Nov 12, 2011 11:32 |  #11

If you are focal length limited, it would be a downgrade. if you can frame the images the same, the high iso would be a slight upgrade with 1d3, but you are loosing resolution, esp at lower iso. autofocus, I have heard all sorts of things, I would say it would be close between the two, with 7d offering the spot focus as the major advantage.
Again, If you think you can get closer with your current lens line up to fame your images the same, go for it. If not, and you end up cropping, anyway you look at it, it will be a downgrade in image quality.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlanU
Cream of the Crop
7,738 posts
Gallery: 144 photos
Likes: 1496
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Nov 12, 2011 11:36 |  #12

exposure metering is better on your 7d when shooting available light. I find the 1dmk3 to bloom alot more than my 50D I owned. If you over expose skin turns yellow tones with a loss of skin texture.

1dmk3 will have cleaner files that are easier to manipulate in raw. Tack sharp images sooc. 7D needs alot more "intelligent" post processing to get similar clean images. ISO 1600 is useable just like the 7D but nothing to rave about.

Not sure how to approach this. 7D you have much more cropping abilities but post processing is needed alot more for clean files in challenging light. 1dmk3 is only 10mp so your very limited in cropping if your spoiled with the higher MP of the 7d. Files are sharper and easier to manipulate compared to the rigid raw files of the 7d. Shooting with a 24L in available light with both bodies and looking at the files on my IPS panel I can feel/see a soft haze fine noise on the 7D but the 1dmk3 is crispy sharp sooc.

Give or take ...its a lateral move. Now if you spend the beans on the 1dmk4 you'll have cleaner high ISO photos but look at the well discussed issues of hunting in AV mode in low contrast low light situations.

Nothing is perfect. I deal with the adequate primitive AF of the 5d series but dont miss the IQ I got with my 1dmk3 and temper "mental" sketchy exposure.

I would say I'd go for the 1d series for shear sexy ownership of a 1d series. I wasn't pleased with the 1dmk3's IQ though. I had a love/hate relationship with my dead on accurate focusing 1dmk3.

At this point in time (nov 2011) this is what canon has on the market / used market. 1dmk4 is still alot of beans!! Once a 5dmk3 hits the market people will complain about full frame with less reach (1.3, 1.6 factor) But i doubt anyone will complain about fantastic IQ and new improved AF.

Both 1dmk3 and 7D are quite close in IQ after all said and done with post processing. I dislike the rigid RAW files of the 7d. I disliked the files falling apart at Iso 1250 on the 1dmk3.

Just remember that when you see online photos MOST people will show you a phoot with a high percentage of a subject in the frame (close face shot) Lotsa MP are concentrated in the frame. These types of photos will look better if your analyzing high ISO photos. If you crop a 10mp file of the 1dmk3 you have alot less MP to play with and for printing purposes you can get limited in the size of print you'll be making.

I'd say going from 7d to 1dmk3 is a lateral move.


5Dmkiv |5Dmkiii | 24LmkII | 85 mkII L | | 16-35L mkII | 24-70 f/2.8L mkii| 70-200 f/2.8 ISL mkII| 600EX-RT x2 | 580 EX II x2 | Einstein's
Fuji - gone
Sony 2 x A7iii w/ Sigma MC-11 adapter | GM16-35 f/2.8 | Sigma 24-70 ART | GM70-200 f/2.8 |Sigma Art 24 f/1.4 | Sigma ART 35 f/1.2 | FE85 f/1.8 | Sigma ART 105 f/1.4 | Godox V860iiS & V1S

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
delhi
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
     
Nov 12, 2011 13:18 as a reply to  @ AlanU's post |  #13

Here's my thoughts on the 1dmkIII :

Need high MP and detail. Downgrade
Need robust body. Upgrade
AF performance. . Sidegrade No convincing result which is better signifcantly
HDSLR. Definitely Downgrade
Wider FOV. Upgrade (might as well get FF)
Reach. Downgrade
Crop-ability. Downgrade
Flash Commander. Downgrade as 1d-has no such capability. Go Nikon.
High ISO. Sidegrade, mkIII will have less noise at same ISO because of lower pixel density. But 7d can go higher ISO.
Memory card redundancy. Upgrade
Overall modern features. Downgrade
Ergonomics. Sidegrade. With the plethora of button customizations, the 7d is unlike other compact EOS dslr for field ergonomic use.

I think the fact that a compact dslr such as the 7D stacks up so well against a 1dIII speaks volume. It is often part of a comparison against not just a 1dIII but even with 1dIV too. Why? Because it delivers 90% of what a modern 1d can for 98% of the enthusiast to semi-pro photography community at 30% of the price.


Vancouver Portrait Photographer (external link)
No toys. Just tools. (external link) :lol:

5d3/1dx AF Guidebook | What AF Points to use for my 5d3/1dx?! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sp1207
Goldmember
1,835 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Right Behind You
     
Nov 12, 2011 13:31 |  #14

Unless you can't afford the right lens for the job then the 7D is inferior in almost every way.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gomboman
Senior Member
723 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Murrieta, CA
     
Nov 12, 2011 13:34 |  #15

delhi wrote in post #13390490 (external link)
Here's my thoughts on the 1dmkIII :

Need high MP and detail. Downgrade
Need robust body. Upgrade
AF performance. . Sidegrade No convincing result which is better signifcantly
HDSLR. Definitely Downgrade
Wider FOV. Upgrade (might as well get FF)
Reach. Downgrade
Crop-ability. Downgrade
Flash Commander. Downgrade as 1d-has no such capability. Go Nikon.
High ISO. Sidegrade, mkIII will have less noise at same ISO because of lower pixel density. But 7d can go higher ISO.
Memory card redundancy. Upgrade
Overall modern features. Downgrade
Ergonomics. Sidegrade. With the plethora of button customizations, the 7d is unlike other compact EOS dslr for field ergonomic use.

I think the fact that a compact dslr such as the 7D stacks up so well against a 1dIII speaks volume. It is often part of a comparison against not just a 1dIII but even with 1dIV too. Why? Because it delivers 90% of what a modern 1d for 98% of the enthusiast to semi-pro photography community at 30% of the price.

Some good points here. I'm going through the same decision process.

Let me guess. You are a 7D owner? :)


1D Mark III | 1D Mark IIN | 5D | 17-40L | 24-70L | 70-200L II | 1.4 TC II| 550EX | And some other stuff
_______________
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,231 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
7d to the 1d MK III - Upgrade or Sidegrade
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1437 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.