Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 12 Nov 2011 (Saturday) 16:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

rude photographers & getting position on the sidelines

 
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Nov 19, 2011 01:19 |  #16

depends on the field but i personally think that when trying to get the best exposure possible shady foreground and shady background makes the cleanest images. shooting into the sun give a hard back light on your subject. and the lighting on your subjects face is even and more pleasing to look at because you can actually capture the detail in their faces rather than having pictures of players kinda of squinting with the sun in their eyes with rather flat lighting that requires higher shutter speeds than desired to freeze the action.

im personally happier with the results i get shooting into the sun, i feel my shots are easier to work with and expose. i am ok with the grass getting blown out as a result if i can have better detail in my opinion which is by no means the right opinion ;) im not as experienced or talented as most people here but the soccer shots i got from shooting into the sun i was overall more proud of the work i did. i just wish my lighting for basketball was better lol

IMAGE: http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6031/6288795595_2a3f07876b_b.jpg
IMAGE: http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6041/6248735894_176e2b6500_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdnan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
465 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Likes: 784
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX area
     
Nov 19, 2011 06:35 |  #17

+1 to shooting into the sun.


Jerry
Gear
Feedback
editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 19, 2011 08:28 |  #18

The athletes look OK with the sunlight behind them I guess, but that screaming overexposed grass just kills those shots for me. The first one isn't too bad, but in the second the overexposed grass is background to most of the athlete and I just don't like it.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Nov 19, 2011 08:36 |  #19

JeffreyG wrote in post #13421764 (external link)
The athletes look OK with the sunlight behind them I guess, but that screaming overexposed grass just kills those shots for me. The first one isn't too bad, but in the second the overexposed grass is background to most of the athlete and I just don't like it.

oh i totally agree with you 100%, i wish i was better at post processing but im almost positive that the blown grass in those 2 shots cant really be fixed but i am very happy with my ability to capture the action well considering my level of experience. if i continue shooting sports im pretty sure my style will change to be more efficient in guaranteeing as many keepers as possible since shooting in the sun for me had a great keeper rate but i dont think it would always be consistent every time. i do not see shooting sports professionally in my future so i am trying to have as much fun as possible while i am shooting since i shoot for my school and once i graduate i wont shoot it anymore unless the school offers to continue paying me as a freelancer




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Nov 19, 2011 08:42 |  #20

Brian_R wrote in post #13421779 (external link)
oh i totally agree with you 100%, i wish i was better at post processing but im almost positive that the blown grass in those 2 shots cant really be fixed but i am very happy with my ability to capture the action well considering my level of experience. if i continue shooting sports im pretty sure my style will change to be more efficient in guaranteeing as many keepers as possible since shooting in the sun for me had a great keeper rate but i dont think it would always be consistent every time. i do not see shooting sports professionally in my future so i am trying to have as much fun as possible while i am shooting since i shoot for my school and once i graduate i wont shoot it anymore unless the school offers to continue paying me as a freelancer

Don't take my comments as being overly critical. I was just stating that the obvious downside to shooting into the sun will often be that you need to blow out the grass, and (IMO) that often doesn't work.

Daylight shooting can be tough for harsh contrast. There are different approaches with different tradeoffs.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Nov 19, 2011 08:58 |  #21

My guess is that she was shorter than you are -- correct?

I'm 6'2" so I get this all the time at LAX tournaments with other PWACs. They cannot shoot from behind me.

When that happens, I just move a bit.

I can only thing of one time I did something else -- I started shooting on my knees and that stopped it, because she knew that I could not shoot around an axe-handle wide body part.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Nov 19, 2011 09:07 |  #22
bannedPermanent ban

jdnan wrote in post #13391104 (external link)
I was shooting a high school football game last night and there was a woman there who was shooting the game as well (I think a mom) & everywhere I would move to position myself, she would go to the same spot, about 2 or 3 feet closer to the line of scrimmage, and about 1 foot in front of me. I'm sure she wasn't intentially doing this, but it was beyond annoying. Finally, after the 4th or 5th time she positioned herself in this manner, I politely asked her not to do this and you would have thought I called her ugly & fat. I've never had someone do this to this degree, do others have this problem often when shooting the sidelines?


Wasn't intentionally doing this? This sounds like it was just to block you off. You should tell someone in charge of the ground (if it wasn't played on a normal park) or someone in charge of the game to give her a warning. Her attitude are totally unwarranted




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Nov 19, 2011 09:25 |  #23

JeffreyG wrote in post #13421794 (external link)
Don't take my comments as being overly critical. I was just stating that the obvious downside to shooting into the sun will often be that you need to blow out the grass, and (IMO) that often doesn't work.

Daylight shooting can be tough for harsh contrast. There are different approaches with different tradeoffs.

oh no i dont. i try to be as open as possible on forums like this because i have the opportunity for someone like yourself to correct me if i am wrong or suggest something better that i dont know, the comments i get and see here are extremely helpful :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
useakme
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Canada
     
Nov 21, 2011 11:11 |  #24

Following you around is one thing but standing in front of you something else. With people like that you have to be firm and show them you are pissed off. She knew what she was doing and didn't care.


Exchange&Review Photography (external link) Gear - 5D Mark II - EF 50 1.8 - Tamron 24-70 F2.8 - Sigma 70mm 2.8 EX Macro - Canon 1.4x Extender - Canon EF 70-200 IS F4.0L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Taylor02GT
Senior Member
892 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Quincy, IL
     
Nov 21, 2011 11:15 |  #25

LiberationFrequency wrote in post #13408562 (external link)
Homecoming and senior day... love all the people wandering around with their iPhones. That was sarcasm, btw.

If it's a 4s id get out of their way..


Taylor - flickr (external link)
Canon EOS 6D + Canon 50mm 1.8 STM | Canon EF 24-105mm F4L
Feedback + Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Nov 21, 2011 12:11 |  #26

Taylor02GT wrote in post #13430732 (external link)
If it's a 4s id get out of their way..


what if it is an iphone with that lens adapter and they are shooting with the same glass as you? do you stop shooting and just see how you can help them? lol




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdnan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
465 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Likes: 784
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX area
     
Nov 21, 2011 13:32 |  #27

400dabuser wrote in post #13421842 (external link)
Wasn't intentionally doing this? This sounds like it was just to block you off. You should tell someone in charge of the ground (if it wasn't played on a normal park) or someone in charge of the game to give her a warning. Her attitude are totally unwarranted

I just found out that she's a free lance photographer & was taking for a local newspaper.

useakme wrote in post #13430718 (external link)
Following you around is one thing but standing in front of you something else. With people like that you have to be firm and show them you are pissed off. She knew what she was doing and didn't care.

That's usually the tact I tend to take because I can easily lose my temper, but I don't like to do that and, thankfully, I was able to maintain my composure and keep a calm & polite demeanor. As I said she did stop, and I think it's partially because she had to have been embarrassed by her behavior and the fact that I was able to maintain my composure.


Jerry
Gear
Feedback
editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,512 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Nov 21, 2011 13:57 |  #28

jdnan wrote in post #13431386 (external link)
I just found out that she's a free lance photographer & was taking for the Dallas Morning News.

Do you mean that she was hoping to sell her shots? That sheds a different light on her behavior. You might have selected the wrong word. It doesn't sound like rudeness. It sounds like intentional sabotage of a potential competitor. She sounds like the type who takes a picture of a pretty wild flower and then crushes it so that nobody else will get a picture of it. She may also be uncertain of her skills and didn't want to miss a good shot that you might have gotten. Or it might have been a situation of "I'm the pro here. Everybody else -- including the 'posers' with pro gear -- need to stay out of my way." None of these justify her behavior, of course.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Nov 24, 2011 06:11 |  #29

Brian_R wrote in post #13421779 (external link)
oh i totally agree with you 100%, i wish i was better at post processing but im almost positive that the blown grass in those 2 shots cant really be fixed but i am very happy with my ability to capture the action well considering my level of experience. if i continue shooting sports im pretty sure my style will change to be more efficient in guaranteeing as many keepers as possible since shooting in the sun for me had a great keeper rate but i dont think it would always be consistent every time. i do not see shooting sports professionally in my future so i am trying to have as much fun as possible while i am shooting since i shoot for my school and once i graduate i wont shoot it anymore unless the school offers to continue paying me as a freelancer

If you adjust (lower) the Lumiance of Green and Yellow, Then adjust the saturation of them, it will give you some improvement.


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,547 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
rude photographers & getting position on the sidelines
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
723 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.