Everyone seemed surprised by the weight/size/IQ of the 70-300L when it came out. I hope the same holds true for a new 100-400L.
gocolts Goldmember 1,246 posts Likes: 14 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Mar 27, 2013 17:10 | #76 Everyone seemed surprised by the weight/size/IQ of the 70-300L when it came out. I hope the same holds true for a new 100-400L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Mar 28, 2013 09:00 | #77 Snydremark wrote in post #15761657  I'm certainly happy enough with my 100-400 that a MkII would have to have a spectacular jump in IQ and/or features for me to drop 2500 on it. Once the price gets down around 1800-1900 I might consider it. same here, the current 100-400 is pretty sharp. I think I'll hold on to it for a while
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1116 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
