Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 15 Nov 2011 (Tuesday) 09:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

my first slow shutter speed with water

 
photocopy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,555 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2011
Location: PNW
     
Nov 15, 2011 09:03 |  #1

I went up to Tumwater Falls which the Deschutes river flows thru the park...
this was my first try at a slow shutter speed..

Cannon T1i 70-200 1.4 L USM
focal length 73mm
exposure 1.000 sec
apt F/32
iso 100
WB auto

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


thanks for looking



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 15, 2011 09:20 |  #2

It appears that F32 (and perhaps a wobbly tripod) are hurting you in terms of sharpness. What makes these shots work is the contrast between sharp shoreline and silky water. You are on the right track but you might want to use a stronger ND filter to so you dont have to do F32, and perhaps compose the shots so you have less shoreline clutter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photocopy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,555 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2011
Location: PNW
     
Nov 15, 2011 09:43 |  #3

thank you.. i have not yet purchased a ND filter... i had a cpl filter that i had to hold up to the camera lens, as i didnt have one to fit.. I am in the process to purchase a few filters one at a time...

what ND filter would be best? the 0.6 or the 0.9?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
Nov 15, 2011 10:39 |  #4

I use either a 4ND or 10ND depending on light conditions. I find the 10ND brings a balance to the lights and darks more so than the 4ND. But the 10ND is hard to focus at times and changes the color hue. Your photos look slightly over exposed to me in the highlights and they also look a tad gray. Here's a shot using a 10ND for example.
http://www.flickr.com …davetoussaint/5​854217572/ (external link)


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 15, 2011 10:39 |  #5

For water blurring the stronger the ND filter the better. If you are serious about this kind of thing you can help yourself by shooting in the morning or evening hours so the light is not as strong and the shadows and contrasting highlights are not so strong as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
Nov 15, 2011 10:44 |  #6

Also if you have different lens sizes IE: my lens are 67, 72 & 77mm filter size I bought a 77mm filter then steup rings to use with my other lens. Saves money!


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 15, 2011 10:47 |  #7

socalrailfan wrote in post #13402703 (external link)
I use either a 4ND or 10ND depending on light conditions. I find the 10ND brings a balance to the lights and darks more so than the 4ND. But the 10ND is hard to focus at times and changes the color hue. Your photos look slightly over exposed to me in the highlights and they also look a tad gray. Here's a shot using a 10ND for example.
http://www.flickr.com …davetoussaint/5​854217572/ (external link)

Excellent shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
socalrailfan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,475 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Riverside, CA
     
Nov 15, 2011 12:27 |  #8

Thanks. I should also point out when I say 4ND 0r 10ND I mean 4 or 10 stop. There's too many ways of what to call these filters.

gonzogolf wrote in post #13402737 (external link)
Excellent shot.


Dave - Riverside, CA PhotographersNature.co​m (external link)
Canon 60D & 40D. Canon 24-105 L, 10-22, 100mmL 50mm 1.4 and 70-300 L lenses.
My photos on Flickr (external link), my Google Earth/Panoramio photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sunman
Member
162 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Nov 15, 2011 12:57 |  #9

nice 1st try..much better than what i had gotten on my first try. keep up the good work..you're on the right track. ensure you have a sturdy tripod and you don't need to use F32...keep it around F8/F11 or so.


Come with me...i'll take you places.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cucamonga ­ Al
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 15, 2011 13:33 |  #10

Like the saying goes "You start by starting". If you take heed to socalrailfan, he has given you excellent information. I'll post one I just shot at f16 at ten seconds with a 4 stop ND, CPL and color enhancer. Keep trying and you will get results.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Have plenty of Canons, enough ammo, enough to blow 'em to "L". Now, I just have to learn to aim.

www.flickr.com/photos/​albert_l_lipsey (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 15, 2011 13:35 |  #11

Cucamonga Al wrote in post #13403427 (external link)
Like the saying goes "You start by starting". If you take heed to socalrailfan, he has given you excellent information. I'll post one I just shot at f16 at ten seconds with a 4 stop ND, CPL and color enhancer. Keep trying and you will get results.

Do you have any of this without so much processing?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cucamonga ­ Al
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 15, 2011 13:55 |  #12

gonzogolf wrote in post #13403438 (external link)
Do you have any of this without so much processing?

Absolutely, but I think you will agree the original looks very dull and ordinary. I'll attach.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Have plenty of Canons, enough ammo, enough to blow 'em to "L". Now, I just have to learn to aim.

www.flickr.com/photos/​albert_l_lipsey (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14870
Joined Dec 2006
     
Nov 15, 2011 14:08 |  #13

Cucamonga Al wrote in post #13403526 (external link)
Absolutely, but I think you will agree the original looks very dull and ordinary. I'll attach.

No, totally disagree. The first one looks like a pretty girl with too much makeup.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dbork
Junior Member
Avatar
23 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Niagara Falls, NY/Groton, CT
     
Nov 15, 2011 16:28 |  #14

I have to agree with gonzogolf. The first one looks you attempted to make a "very dull and ordinary" photo into something similar to HDR but didn't quite nail it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cucamonga ­ Al
Goldmember
Avatar
2,095 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 15, 2011 16:50 |  #15

gonzogolf wrote in post #13403581 (external link)
No, totally disagree. The first one looks like a pretty girl with too much makeup.

You know, people are funny. I guess what appeals to some, isn't others cup of tea. It was my #1 selling print over the weekend at a street fair. I guess people out here like girls with too much make-up. What are ya' going to do!!!!!


Have plenty of Canons, enough ammo, enough to blow 'em to "L". Now, I just have to learn to aim.

www.flickr.com/photos/​albert_l_lipsey (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,697 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
my first slow shutter speed with water
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1338 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.