-=5D2 owners unite! Discuss and Post Photos! (Round 3)

Some more from the auto show:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995112​79/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995125​97/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995173​45/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995242​39/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995722​55/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995807​71/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995753​71/

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

white fire. wrote in post #13921520
I use a 5D2.

haha love the whole set! Very fun!

Tony_Stark wrote in post #13921895
Some more from the auto show:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gbucur/68995112​79/
IMG_5520.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_5572-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_5616-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_5629-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_6096-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_6161-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_6121-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr


IMG_6219-Edit.jpg by George.Bucur, on Flickr

Rest of set with more updated photos: http://www.flickr.com …r/sets/72157629​365809211/

That first shot is just off to me. Maybe it's just me but it looks OOF. I am not sure about that but something is off compared to the rest you posted here. As for the rest..... AWESOME. Very sharp! Kudos to you.

Big C wrote in post #13921422
Sigma 50 1.4 @ 1.4 - Natural light + silver reflector

beautiful

white fire. wrote in post #13921520
I use a 5D2.

these are great.. i enjoyed all of them .. great work

Tom O. wrote in post #13921947
That first shot is just off to me. Maybe it's just me but it looks OOF. I am not sure about that but something is off compared to the rest you posted here. As for the rest..... AWESOME. Very sharp! Kudos to you.

Haha thank you! The focus was on the front logo and its sharp when I worked on it in post. Maybe its an awkward composition?

my other addiction besides photography.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/denn-ice/6899774023/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/denn-ice/6899773613/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/denn-ice/6899773153/

took it for an outside test

my old van gave it to my brother

Maverique wrote in post #13922206

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

A wild frog appears! by Nuno Conceição, on Flickr

coqui!

reminds me of home
beautiful pic

Tom O. wrote in post #13921936
haha love the whole set! Very fun!

Me to! Great stuff...I've got a bag of those Costco strawberries in my freezer also!

Playing with whitefire's 5D2...

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/moomoopanda/6​900443425/

Tony_Stark, awesome CARtography man. The way you shot these with the 24-105 makes me think twice about getting the 24-70. Feels like its a better walk around lens.

moomoopanda wrote in post #13922576
Playing with whitefire's 5D2...

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/moomoopanda/6​900443425/
85LLL. by Henderson Nguyen, on Flickr

UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF
UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF
UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF
UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF
UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF
UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF UNF

WARAT wrote in post #13922696
Tony_Stark, awesome CARtography man. The way you shot these with the 24-105 makes me think twice about getting the 24-70. Feels like its a better walk around lens.

I wasnt a huge fan of the 24-105 to begin with, but the lens is really sharp and great for shows such as these. I myself prefer more shallow DoF but for a flexible range the 24-105 is hard to beat. I wanted to rent the 24-70 for this show, but I didnt have enough funds to do so.

I took a look at the stats from all the shots I took at the show (700+) and the range most used was 24mm and 105mm. I also used the 135L for close up detail shots, and that lens accounted for quite big chunk of photos as well.

I also shot through a CPL filter which made some shots hazy and detracted from IQ quite a bit (even though I used a really good quality one from B+W, paid over $200 for it). I will be going on vacation to Cuba in a month or so, and will be using my 24-105 a bit there also. I may rent a lens for the trip but Im sure the 24-105 would do an amazing job to capture a lot of keepers.