Anyone use the 14 2.8 for weddings?

timnosenzo wrote in post #13430351
Here's a size comparison. It's definitely considerably smaller than the 16-35 - especially if you're using the hood on the zoom.

Nice set of toys you have there sir

Good to see that I'm not the only one drooling.

FYI Robert,

I just noticed that there is a v1 listed in the classifieds right now.

helloagain36 wrote in post #13440628
FYI Robert,

I just noticed that there is a v1 listed in the classifieds right now.

My impression is that the newer version is significantly better than the older one. At least that's according to the reviews at The Digital Picture.

nicksan wrote in post #13440670
My impression is that the newer version is significantly better than the older one. At least that's according to the reviews at The Digital Picture.

Yeah...I figured as much since the v1 listed is $1000 cheaper.

i've used the samyang a bit. it can get some pretty cool shots like the whole church or some fun dance floor shots. its very limited but its only 400 dollars and its really light.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Yes I do, only cause Canon hasn't got a 14-24

Great for wide angles of the church and reception venue. ****e for people shots.

smorter wrote in post #13467650
Yes I do, only cause Canon hasn't got a 14-24

Great for wide angles of the church and reception venue. ****e for people shots.

I've heard of some fellows who go as far as adapting the 14-24 to EOS and dealing with the MF... but you'll never fine me dropping ~$1500 for what's in practice manual glass.