What do you think?
montanagriz Member 180 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Savannah GA. More info | Nov 19, 2011 23:01 | #1 |
MattinVA Member 108 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Newport News, Virginia More info | Nov 19, 2011 23:02 | #2 I think it looks a *little* hot, but very nice composition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2011 23:06 | #3 What does hot mean? lol Vanessa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MattinVA Member 108 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Newport News, Virginia More info | Nov 19, 2011 23:07 | #4 Bright, maybe that's just my opinion. It's a nice image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aemravan Goldmember 1,622 posts Likes: 420 Joined Jun 2010 More info | Nov 19, 2011 23:12 | #5 I think the exposure is pretty darn good, there is plenty of detail in the whites Canon 5Diii - Canon 24-70 2.8L - Canon 100 2.8L Macro - Sigma 50 1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewEnglandPhotographer Goldmember 2,343 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Nov 19, 2011 23:13 | #6 The pose seems awkward to me. Most of the woman is blocked, and it appears she is gripping his sweater for dear life. Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2011 23:19 | #7 Thank you Vanessa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 19, 2011 23:22 | #8 http://www.flickr.com …/vanessahagen/6367127201/ Vanessa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewEnglandPhotographer Goldmember 2,343 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Nov 19, 2011 23:48 | #9 montanagriz wrote in post #13424646 http://www.flickr.com …/vanessahagen/6367127201/ Maybe this one looks a tad better? that's the same photo, no? Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2011 00:00 | #10 ewheeler20 wrote in post #13424701 that's the same photo, no? It is. Im sorry. I just thought maybe that the one on the link would look just a bit better as far as it maybe being to bright like when he was refering to it being "hot". I just put it there for yall to see if there was any difference or if you could see any difference. Vanessa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2011 00:06 | #11 It does have a lighter feel to it on this forum vs. the one Im seeing on my screen in my photo viewer. I wonder why it is like that? Vanessa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MattinVA Member 108 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Newport News, Virginia More info | Nov 20, 2011 00:14 | #12 calibration.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blurry_image Senior Member 473 posts Joined Apr 2007 More info | Nov 20, 2011 00:29 | #13 montanagriz wrote in post #13424738 It is. Im sorry. I just thought maybe that the one on the link would look just a bit better as far as it maybe being to bright like when he was refering to it being "hot". I just put it there for yall to see if there was any difference or if you could see any difference. ![]()
---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NewEnglandPhotographer Goldmember 2,343 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Nov 20, 2011 00:30 | #14 that edit is much better. more pleasing to the eye. Canon 7D | 70-200mm f2.8is II L | 24-70mm f2.8 L | 50mm f1.8 | 28mm f1.8 | Canon 1.4x TC II | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MattinVA Member 108 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Newport News, Virginia More info | Nov 20, 2011 00:32 | #15 awesome! Exactly what I meant. Again, great image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry 1795 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||