Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 20 Nov 2011 (Sunday) 15:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Crop bodies with EF-S lenses...

 
BarrySpug
Member
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2011
     
Nov 20, 2011 15:41 |  #1

Something I've always wondered but never actually asked to find out.

I have a 7D and with my EF lenses I know I have to multiply the focal length by 1.6 to get the equivalent full frame value:

eg - an EF 50mm lens = 80mm on a 1.6 crop body

My question is - do I still have to do this calculation when using EF-S lenses with my 7D? Or is the calculation already factored in with EF-S lenses?

I have an 18-135mm EF-S lens. Is that an accurate indication of the focal range or do I still have to multiply it by 1.6 making the effective focal range of that lens 29-216mm?


Canon 7D gripped | EF-S 18-135mm | EF 50mm 1.8 | EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II | Steady hand | Fingers Crossed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
Avatar
2,336 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Bella Vista, AR
     
Nov 20, 2011 15:46 |  #2

You still have to multiply mm times 1.6. The value of the lens is the same, it is the mount that makes it efs.


6D, 5D, 7Dii, Eos R and too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Nov 20, 2011 15:57 |  #3

why do you think you have to multiply the crop factor...i mean, what does it matter what the 35mm equivalent is...if you're used to looking at 50mm thru a crop camera, how does it help you to know that it would be like looking thru an 80mm lens on a FF camera...

my point is...forget about multiplying anything until you move to a FF camera

but yeah, 50mm EF = 50mm EF-S...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,435 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 20, 2011 16:14 |  #4

The focal length of a lens is whatever it is, regardless of what mount it has (EF or EF-S). The EF-S lenses are just constructed differently to take advantage of the build of APS cameras (smaller mirror). And 50mm lens is a 50mm lens regardless of the camera you put it on. It just has a different field of view, depending on the sensor size.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Nov 20, 2011 16:20 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

DreDaze wrote in post #13427088 (external link)
why do you think you have to multiply the crop factor...i mean, what does it matter what the 35mm equivalent is...if you're used to looking at 50mm thru a crop camera, how does it help you to know that it would be like looking thru an 80mm lens on a FF camera...

well i think it's better to learn the difference between a ff and crop FoV sooner rather than later. It helps to know all these things when it comes to lens selection and planning future purchases.


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4522
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 20, 2011 16:27 |  #6

DreDaze wrote in post #13427088 (external link)
why do you think you have to multiply the crop factor...i mean, what does it matter what the 35mm equivalent is...if you're used to looking at 50mm thru a crop camera, how does it help you to know that it would be like looking thru an 80mm lens on a FF camera...

my point is...forget about multiplying anything until you move to a FF camera

^^^

If you are accustomed to having used one format, and then change over to starting to the other format, only then could it be handy to know the conversion factor, simply to let you grab 'the equivalent FL' for the new format. If I like shooting portraits with 100mm lens on FF, if I were to pick up an APS-C camera for the first time, it could be handy to know I need a 60mm lens to shoot the same shot with the smaller format camera. If you never encounter this need, you absolutely do know need to know any conversion factor... the arithmetic is pointless.

I have shot in 4 formats...APS-C, FF, 645, and 4x5. The use of a conversion factor never was useful to me in working in one format vs. another. If I wanted to use a 'very wide angle' lens, I simply know to grab 15mm, 24mm, 40mm, and 90mm for the respective format, there is no arithmetic needed!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonnie
Member
77 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Nov 20, 2011 16:35 as a reply to  @ kin2son's post |  #7

I'm glad this post is on here, because I was about to come on and ask a very similar question.

I was having a look at the crop factor lesson on Vimeo Video School (http://vimeo.com …ol/lesson/127/c​rop-factor (external link)) which says:

certain lenses are actually made for APS-C sensors. In that scenario, the listed focal length on the lens itself will, when placed on your APS-C camera, give you a field of view that's true to the lenses specifications. For example, a 35mm lens that's been made for an APS-C based camera will give you 35mm field of view when mounted to an APS-C based camera.

This confused me because my EF 50mm prime looks exactly the same as my EF-S 18-55mm kit lens when set to 50mm. Surely that means the above quote is incorrect - EF-S lenses are made for cameras with APS-C sensors, but you still need to multiply the focal length by the crop factor if you want to convert it to a full frame sensor equivalent.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Nov 20, 2011 16:52 |  #8

^^yeah, they're wrong on that one


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4522
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 20, 2011 16:53 |  #9

If I take a 30mm EF-S lens and mount it on a 7D and stand 20' away from a subject which is 10' tall, the object will be about 7.5mm tall on the sensor, within an image circle which is perhaps 30mm in diameter and which covers the 15mm x 22mm APS-C frame size. At about 7.5mm the subject will fill about 1/2 of the 14.8mm frame height; 30mm on APS-C is about a 'normal lens' angle of view.

If I take a 30mm EF lens and mount it on a 5D and stand 20' away from a subject which is 10' tall, the object will be about 7.5mm tall on the sensor, within an image circle which is perhaps 45mm in diameter and which covers the 24mm x 36mm FF frame size. At 7.5mm the subject will fill only about 1/3 of the 24mm frame height; 30mm on FF is a 'wide angle' angle of view.

Things to make special note about...


  1. Note that the subject is identically sized on both camera sensors!
  2. Note that the difference between EF-S and EF mount lenses is the size of the image circle and its ability to fill the frame or not (e.g., EF-S image circle could never fill a 24 x 36mm FF frame!)
  3. Note that the angle of view which is capture is determined solely by the size of the frame.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HeaTransfer
Senior Member
554 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Nov 20, 2011 17:01 |  #10

(Just waiting for SkipD...). That quote is confusing.

The focal length of a lens is its focal length. Mount (ef, ef-s) or even system (nikon, medium format) does not matter.

When people talk about crop factor, they are talking about field of view. If you are used to what 50mm looks like on 35mm, you would need a 30mm focal length on aps-c to get about the same field of view. To answer the original question w the 18-135 ef-s, the focal length is exactly 18-135.

The amount of stuff you can fit into the frame would be about the same as if you had a 29-216 on film or full frame digital. The perspective though will be different.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4522
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 20, 2011 17:11 |  #11

HeaTransfer wrote in post #13427392 (external link)
The amount of stuff you can fit into the frame would be about the same as if you had a 29-216 on film or full frame digital. The perspective though will be different.

To be clear, a 30mm lens used on APS-C will have identical perspective to using a 50mm lens on FF, if both cameras shoot a photo from the exact same position! The FOV captured will also be identical on APS-C and FF.
To be clear, a 30mm lens used on APS-C will have identical perspective to using a 30mm lens on FF, if both cameras shoot a photo from the exact same position! The FOV captured will be quite different on APS-C vs. FF.

Perspective is altered by camera position only.
FOV captured is altered by frame size and FL.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Desert ­ Pictures
Member
Avatar
163 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
     
Nov 20, 2011 18:52 |  #12

Another explanation for doing the math (X 1.6) is that us old geezers who started with 35mm SLRs understand the results better after converting the FL to account for the crop factor. (smile)

Dave


Prime Lens Guy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 20, 2011 20:01 |  #13

BarrySpug wrote in post #13427031 (external link)
I have a 7D and with my EF lenses I know I have to multiply the focal length by 1.6 to get the equivalent full frame value:

eg - an EF 50mm lens = 80mm on a 1.6 crop body

As others have mentioned, there is no real need to do the "crop factor" math unless you are comparing the field of view of different format cameras. "Format" refers to the size of the film frame or digital sensor in a camera.

BarrySpug wrote in post #13427031 (external link)
My question is - do I still have to do this calculation when using EF-S lenses with my 7D? Or is the calculation already factored in with EF-S lenses?

NO. All lenses for SLR cameras are marked with their actual focal length (or focal length range in the case of zoom lenses). Focal length is focal length is focal length as the saying goes. Any 50mm lens, for example, would provide the very same field of view on your camera regardless of the design of the lens (EF-S mount, EF mount, non-Canon, etc.).

BarrySpug wrote in post #13427031 (external link)
I have an 18-135mm EF-S lens. Is that an accurate indication of the focal range or do I still have to multiply it by 1.6 making the effective focal range of that lens 29-216mm?

There is no such thing as an "effective focal length". If there were, then one camera format would have to be the standard against which all other camera formats are measured. There is none. The 35mm film format is not, never has been, and never will be such a standard format.

To help you further understand "crop factor" issues, you can read the following which I've published a few times here:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The "crop factor" is a reference number that relates to the difference in film or sensor size (known as the camera's "format") between two cameras like the Canon 7D and a 35 mm film (or a so-called "full-frame" digital) camera. Let me list the facts:

35 mm film cameras and so-called "full frame" DSLRs have a film frame or sensor size of approximately 24 mm X 36 mm, while the Canon 7D has an APS-C sized sensor, measuring approximately 14.9 mm X 22.3 mm. The whole line of Canon APS-C format cameras - starting with the D30 in the year 2000 and progressing through all of the "digital Rebel" xxxD series, the xxD series, and today's 7D - all have sensors that are approximately the same size (± 0.2 mm).

When camera manufacturers started designing digital SLRs (DSLRs), they decided that the DSLR bodies should be about the same physical size and configuration as their 35 mm film SLRs. For that reason, they concluded that they could use the line of lenses they already had for their 35 mm SLRs on the new DSLRs.

All lenses designed for 35 mm film cameras project an image circle onto the film that covers a 24 mm X 36 mm rectangle. The 35 mm camera records the portion of that image circle that is defined by the opening behind the shutter for the film (24 mm X 36 mm in size). A digital SLR with an APS-C sized sensor only records the smaller area (approximately 14.9 mm X 22.3 mm) of the image circle projected by the same lens.

When you put a 100 mm lens on a 35 mm film camera and make a photograph, then put the same lens on a DSLR such as the Canon 7D and make a similar photograph - same subject, same position for the camera, and same focal length - and then enlarge both photographs to the same size print (4 X 6 inches, for example), it will appear as though the photo from the Canon 7D was taken with a longer lens. That is because the image recorded by the Canon 7D was of a SMALLER PORTION of the image circle projected by the lens - cropped, if you will - compared to the image recorded by the 35 mm camera.

The special lenses made by Canon for the 7D (and other Canon APS-C cameras starting with the 300D - the first Digital Rebel) are called the EF-S series. These project a smaller image circle, making the lenses less expensive to design and produce in wide-angle and extreme wide-angle formats. The EF-S lenses also project deeper into the camera than the EF specification allows (the "S" referring to "Short back focus), allowing for less expensive wide-angle lens designs. However, an EF-S lens set to 40 mm will produce the exact same image as an EF lens set to 40 mm if both lenses are used on the same APS-C format body and both lenses are focused at "infinity". Focal length is focal length, period.

Now to the primary point that I want to make: NOTHING about lens EVER CHANGES when you put it on different format cameras. Focal length never changes. Aperture range never changes. The only thing that would change is the apparent field of view, and that change is not a function of the lens but it is a function of the size of the sensor or film that will record the image.

The "crop factor" is NOTHING MORE than a REFERENCE between two camera formats that lets you compare the field of view of particular focal lengths between the two formats. For the photographer who started with an APS-C format DSLR and has never used a 35 mm format camera (at least enough to have developed a feel for what certain focal lengths provide him/her), the "crop factor" calculations can be completely forgotten for day-to-day lens selections. Only when comparing two camera formats is the "crop factor" useful.

The "crop factor" calculation for "35 mm equivalent focal length" has only one valid use. That is for comparing the field of view of lenses used on two different format cameras.

Here's one common example: Joe took a photo of Mount Rushmore with a 35 mm camera from a particular place using a 200 mm lens. You want to replicate that photo with your Canon 7D. What focal length do you need to do that from the same location that he took his photo? Divide the 200 mm by 1.6 and you get the answer - 125 mm.

Here's another popular example: Mary Sue has been using a Canon SX120 IS point-n-shoot camera and is wanting to use a Canon 50D DSLR. She is, of course, interested in what focal lengths she would need to keep the versatility of the SX120 camera's 10X super-zoom lens. The SX120 lens is actually a 6.0 mm to 60.0 mm lens, but the advertising also shows the "35 mm equivalent" focal length range as 36 mm to 360 mm. To know the focal lengths needed for the 50D, merely divide the "35 mm equivalent" values by 1.6. In other words, Mary Sue would need 22.5 mm on the short end and 225 mm on the long end for the 50D to have the same field (angle) of view coverage as her SX120 IS camera.

The "crop factor" (as related to using lenses essentially designed for 35 mm SLR cameras) is always given assuming that the 35 mm film format (24 mm X 36 mm) is the reference master. Something to realize, though, is that the 35 mm film format is not, never has been, and never will be the "master" format against which all other camera formats are referenced. It is simply the format of the cameras that have also evolved into today's commonly used digital SLRs.

Beginning photographers are often first confronted with the crop factor puzzle when choosing their first DSLR camera. Intuitively, "Full Frame" sounds better than "Cropped", as if one is getting a complete camera instead of a partial camera. There are very few really significant differences (other than features) between similar-generation cameras of different formats. The fact is that both format cameras can be used to make essentially identical images, though different focal lengths will be needed on them to keep the framing the same.

Beginning photographers are also confronted with "crop factor" issues when buying lenses. Focal length (translated to how big or small of a field of view you want) is the first factor to consider when asking the “which lens?” question. The beginner doesn't have to convert every focal length to its "35 mm equivalent focal length" value but they should know that, on their APS-C camera, a 28 mm lens isn't going to be wide angle but instead is a "normal" focal length and that a 250 mm lens is going to be a rather long telephoto.

Many photographers who are new to DSLRs have acquired some very wrong ideas about "crop factor" issues. For example, they sometimes expect the focal lengths of EF-S lenses to be different (as in the focal lengths being pre-converted for the "crop factor") than the focal lengths of EF lens. This is completely false, as all SLR lenses are marked with their actual focal lengths. In addition, many new photographers who use APS-C format DSLRs seem to have been fed with the idea that they need to employ the "crop factor" calculations whenever thinking about using lenses on their cameras. This is generally not necessary at all as I have outlined above.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BarrySpug
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2011
     
Nov 20, 2011 21:59 |  #14

Ok - I think the issue with my OP is that I should have used the term "Field of View" as opposed to focal range.

But thanks to all who replied.


Canon 7D gripped | EF-S 18-135mm | EF 50mm 1.8 | EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II | Steady hand | Fingers Crossed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 20, 2011 22:02 |  #15

BarrySpug wrote in post #13428795 (external link)
Ok - I think the issue with my OP is that I should have used the term "Field of View" as opposed to focal range.

But thanks to all who replied.

Barry - what I question is why you feel the need to do the "crop factor" calculation at all. Do you have enough experience with a 35mm film camera so that you automatically think of a focal length for a particular setup? If not, you can totally forget the calculation unless you are deliberately comparing two different format cameras.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,335 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Crop bodies with EF-S lenses...
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1384 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.