Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 22 Nov 2011 (Tuesday) 15:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2 umbrellas, 2 flashes for large group shots?

 
bluefire7
Member
Avatar
190 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Queens, NY
     
Nov 22, 2011 15:14 |  #1

Hi all, I'm anticipating photographing my first "large" indoor church wedding, and just wondering what you would do with my setup? I currently have 2 umbrellas (1 softlighter, actually) 45" and 46", and a 580EXII as well as a 430EXII set off using radiopopper JrX's. looking through the forums, I see that the most common way is to use 1 umbrella high overhead angled at the group. Would it be prudent to try and use both my umbrellas in the same fashion but maybe one brolly 3 feet left and one 3 feet right of me? What's the maximum number of people you'd suggest lighting in this way? Any input would be fantastic, as I've never lit a "large" group before without natural light :)


Canon 5DmkIV | Canon 16-35 F2.8L II, Canon 100 F2.8L Macro, Canon 135 F2L, Canon 24-70 F2.8L II, Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II, Sigma 50 F1.4 ART, Sigma 85 F1.4, | Canon 600 RT, Canon 580 EXII, Canon 430 EXII | Radiopopper JrX's
NY Wedding Photographer (external link):eek:
LIKE Us (external link):cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Nov 22, 2011 15:18 |  #2

What's a "large" group? How many people are we talking here?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bluefire7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
190 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Queens, NY
     
Nov 22, 2011 15:22 |  #3

the wedding itself is around 175. i'm assuming the largest group would be 40-45 or so at the most (i hope...)?


Canon 5DmkIV | Canon 16-35 F2.8L II, Canon 100 F2.8L Macro, Canon 135 F2L, Canon 24-70 F2.8L II, Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II, Sigma 50 F1.4 ART, Sigma 85 F1.4, | Canon 600 RT, Canon 580 EXII, Canon 430 EXII | Radiopopper JrX's
NY Wedding Photographer (external link):eek:
LIKE Us (external link):cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Nov 22, 2011 18:22 |  #4

That seems like an uncommonly large group; are you sure? It's very rare that I have to shoot a group larger than 20. If you're really doing 40+, your biggest problem will be arranging them so you can see everyone, not how to light them.

If it were me, I suppose I'd use two speedlights at comparable power, one a few feet to each side of the camera in umbrellas pointed directly toward the group and very high up. If, however, your group is "only" 20 or so, you'd be suprised by how well you can do with a single speedlight and umbrella. This group of ~20 was shot with just one 580 off to camera right through a small 22" umbrella. Other than the small boy who couldn't be coaxed out from behind the couch, it's farely well lit for a single light.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Nov 22, 2011 20:32 |  #5

I agree with what Robert said. Two speedlights/umbrella combos should be plenty. But it might be worthwhile to cox the couple into shooting smaller groups instead of one large group.

I had a recent wedding where the bride wanted the entire wedding party plus guests in a single pic. This is what I came up with.

IMAGE: http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x148/jcolman_photo/sherry%20and%20kevin/SherryandKevin-495.jpg

www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Nov 22, 2011 20:37 |  #6

Ain't pretty, but it is what it is I guess. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 22, 2011 20:40 |  #7

I rarely do this type of shot. Once years ago I messed it up by using multiple bare speedlites, I got horrible shadows on people and the wall. Horrible. Took ages to make it ok in photoshop. I do group photos outside now. Once I had to do them in a gym, I bounced the light off the very high ceiling. It was fine. High ISO is no problem.

The light directly overhead is to reduce the chance of someone in the 2nd or further back row being in the shadow of someone else. So one main light is best. Have an accent light if you want, but I wouldn't.

You have to be careful of reflections in the background. You may also need a ladder. Restrict the size of groups if you need to.

Honestly, keep it simple. Also, practice, if you can, but getting big groups is difficult.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bluefire7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
190 posts
Gallery: 47 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Queens, NY
     
Nov 23, 2011 11:39 |  #8

Thanks for the great input and examples, all!! Will put it into play and hope for the best


Canon 5DmkIV | Canon 16-35 F2.8L II, Canon 100 F2.8L Macro, Canon 135 F2L, Canon 24-70 F2.8L II, Canon 70-200 F2.8L IS II, Sigma 50 F1.4 ART, Sigma 85 F1.4, | Canon 600 RT, Canon 580 EXII, Canon 430 EXII | Radiopopper JrX's
NY Wedding Photographer (external link):eek:
LIKE Us (external link):cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Nov 25, 2011 11:06 |  #9

I agree, one light is best. I had a large group last weekend and, since it was raining outside, we had to do all the group shots inside the church. My initial setup was two OCF bounced into 30" silver/black umbrellas, setup on the outer edges of the group at 45 degree angles. I liked the light this produced but there were a lot of shadows behind the group. Switching to one OCF, placed directly behind me and raised up to about nine feet, yielded much better results.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oharing
Senior Member
Avatar
564 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Miami, FL
     
Mar 07, 2014 07:11 |  #10

PhotoMatte wrote in post #13449501 (external link)
I agree, one light is best. I had a large group last weekend and, since it was raining outside, we had to do all the group shots inside the church. My initial setup was two OCF bounced into 30" silver/black umbrellas, setup on the outer edges of the group at 45 degree angles. I liked the light this produced but there were a lot of shadows behind the group. Switching to one OCF, placed directly behind me and raised up to about nine feet, yielded much better results.

Sometimes the easiest solutions produce the best light. Have you tried with three light sources...? One in the middle and two on each side? I guess it is getting complicated but I am just wondering....


Miami Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Mar 10, 2014 00:37 |  #11

oharing wrote in post #16740757 (external link)
Sometimes the easiest solutions produce the best light. Have you tried with three light sources...? One in the middle and two on each side? I guess it is getting complicated but I am just wondering....

Guess I forgot to say I also had my 580EXII on-camera in that setup. Now that I've switched to three 600RT speedlights, everything is much simpler: the two off-camera lights are set to Manual and the on-camera speedlight is set to E-TTL


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oharing
Senior Member
Avatar
564 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Miami, FL
     
Mar 10, 2014 11:37 |  #12

PhotoMatte wrote in post #16747108 (external link)
Guess I forgot to say I also had my 580EXII on-camera in that setup. Now that I've switched to three 600RT speedlights, everything is much simpler: the two off-camera lights are set to Manual and the on-camera speedlight is set to E-TTL

Can you post some photos how the photos turn out... ?
Thanks!


Miami Wedding Photographers (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Mar 10, 2014 19:50 |  #13

Sure, here's an example:

http://photomatte.smug​mug.com …/Allison-Josh/i-MVLDLBZ/A (external link)

I'm sending this from my iPad so I hope it works. (If not, it's image #143)


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Mar 10, 2014 19:55 |  #14

Here's another example, with a single subject this time. The off-camera 600RT on the left was slightly behind the bride in order to give her a little bit of rim light around her hair and separate her from the background.
http://photomatte.smug​mug.com …ylie-Jonathan/i-rX3dgqz/A (external link)


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Mar 10, 2014 19:59 |  #15

And, since the OP was asking about large group shots, here's one more:
http://photomatte.smug​mug.com …/Allison-Josh/i-zgp5Fq2/A (external link)


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,291 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
2 umbrellas, 2 flashes for large group shots?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1366 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.