Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Nov 2011 (Wednesday) 21:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

HELP?!?!?! Sigma 10-20 or Canon 60D problems!

 
gkw12345
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 21:46 |  #1

Hey,
So basically, this is my problem:

My Sigma lens has suffered from the problem where the far left side of the image is horrendously blur and soft. Then, approx. 3 weeks back, I accidentally knocked the camera+lens and the lens became tremendously better ( Whoa, I know). However, I did not realise that yet and sent the lens to Sigma service centre to repair the soft left side issue. At the centre, they tested the lens on my body, and their 5d ii, and came to the conclusion that apart from back focusing, the lens was perfectly alright and they had fixed the backfocusing. Furthermore, they said that there could have been something wrong with my body.
The way they tested the lens was just a "sophisticated and dedicated measuring tape like sheet of paper used to test for front-back/ left-right focusing'. However, this paper only covered a vertical strip in the centre of the image and not the far left or right.

After getting back my lens, I decided to do a couple more tests, and found something VERY peculiar.
The below is the image which had this funny thing:
EXIF of the Original Image can be found via Flickr.
Original Image ( except for resizing) [Focus point right in the middle]

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6392716731_c721192408_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/23350847@N07/6​392716731/  (external link)

100% Crop of roughly centre:
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7005/6392716881_ac9cf0cec2_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/23350847@N07/6​392716881/  (external link)

100% Crop of far left:
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7169/6392716971_406d14e35a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/23350847@N07/6​392716971/  (external link)

100% Crop of far right:
IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7012/6392717041_0e28503ec0_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/23350847@N07/6​392717041/  (external link)

As you can see from the images, IQ decreases significantly at the far left of the image as compared to the far right.
However, the top of the car in the far left image still stays relatively sharp as compared to the background in the distance, which is really perplexing.
I'm not to sure if there is something wrong with the lens alignment, or the sensor alignment.

Can any masters here please help?
This is really quite urgent and thanks for reading through this long text!
Please feel free to ask for any information which I've not stated here.

60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Nov 23, 2011 21:53 |  #2

Possibly a de-centered lens element.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkw12345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:00 |  #3

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13443673 (external link)
Possibly a de-centered lens element.

Thanks for the speedy reply!

So do you think it could be something to do with the body or probably the lens?
And what should I do to test if it's a decentred element before bringing it back?
And what should I say to the guy who repaired the lens?
He insists that it is perfect based on the little chart of his, which he claims is SOP for Sigma Service Centre....
Argh.


60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:12 |  #4

What does the car on the left side look like?


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkw12345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:14 |  #5

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #13443743 (external link)
What does the car on the left side look like?

Sorry I don't really understand your question, but perhaps you could refer to the original image to see a larger view of the car?


60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:16 |  #6

You don't have a pro account so for the full res file isn't available.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkw12345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:21 |  #7

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #13443757 (external link)
You don't have a pro account so for the full res file isn't available.

Just upgraded to pro ( was gonna do so anyways )
Uploading the full-res currently.

OT abit, but with pro, can anyone download my full-res images?

Edit
Full Res can be found here: http://www.flickr.com …3/sizes/o/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)


60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:22 |  #8

gkw12345 wrote in post #13443781 (external link)
Just upgraded to pro ( was gonna do so anyways )
Uploading the full-res currently.

OT abit, but with pro, can anyone download my full-res images?

You can restrict the sizes people have access to if you care...or just change the usage rights.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:23 |  #9

2000 x 1333? 2.6MP?


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkw12345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:26 |  #10

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #13443791 (external link)
2000 x 1333? 2.6MP?

I'm sorry?
Edit
In case you missed it, full Res can be found here: http://www.flickr.com …/2335084...n/ph​otostream/ (external link)


60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:39 |  #11

gkw12345 wrote in post #13443809 (external link)
I'm sorry?
Edit
In case you missed it, full Res can be found here: http://www.flickr.com …/2335084...n/ph​otostream/ (external link)

Your "full res" file is 2000 x 1333 pixels which is equivalent to 2.6MP.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkw12345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:42 |  #12

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #13443849 (external link)
Your "full res" file is 2000 x 1333 pixels which is equivalent to 2.6MP.

Hmm Strange....
IT works fine for me :\
How bout this link: http://www.flickr.com …3/sizes/o/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)
:confused:
Or perhaps you could just go to my photostream and click the latest image?


60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:47 |  #13

gkw12345 wrote in post #13443863 (external link)
Hmm Strange....
IT works fine for me :\
How bout this link: http://www.flickr.com …3/sizes/o/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)
:confused:
Or perhaps you could just go to my photostream and click the latest image?

That's better, perhaps I misundestood you when you said you were uploading it...you can replace a file on flickr...you dont' have to upload an entirely new image.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkw12345
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
114 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:49 |  #14

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #13443884 (external link)
That's better, perhaps I misundestood you when you said you were uploading it...you can replace a file on flickr...you dont'
have to upload an entirely new image.

Oh sorry, didn't know I could do that :oops:
Will keep that in mind next time!


60D . Sigma 70-200 f2.8 OS . Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 . Sigma 50mm f1.4 . Tamron 17-50 VC . Nissin Di866

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Nov 23, 2011 22:49 |  #15

After reviewing your image it looks like things might be better in focus very close to the camera. Can you try focusing manually at the hyperfocal distance instead of using autofocus?


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,325 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
HELP?!?!?! Sigma 10-20 or Canon 60D problems!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1123 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.