Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 27 Nov 2011 (Sunday) 23:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Self Family Portrait - CC Please

 
Sheldon ­ N
Goldmember
Avatar
2,164 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Nov 28, 2011 19:52 |  #16

Nicely done. I agree with the prior poster on using a rim/hair light. A gridded strip box above is great for that.

You'll get better expressions if you plan out the shot/posing and then shoot it as a composite image and assemble in Photoshop. Shoot lots of frames with your family to get them looking on camera, then shoot a couple shots with yourself in the frame with the self timer or remote release.

I did our own family portrait yesterday with the same approach. This is a composite of three frames:

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v483/sheldonnalos/250R2666-Edit.jpg

One light on background, stripbox above for hair light and big Octa for key light (all Elinchrom).

My flickr (external link) | Gear + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Nov 28, 2011 20:28 |  #17

Nice job! I have no idea how to use photoshop. I use Aperture and apparently need a newer computer as mine is crawling when I use photo editing software.


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sheldon ­ N
Goldmember
Avatar
2,164 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Nov 28, 2011 22:28 |  #18

mckinleypics wrote in post #13465694 (external link)
Nice job! I have no idea how to use photoshop. I use Aperture and apparently need a newer computer as mine is crawling when I use photo editing software.

You should look into getting photoshop, it can help out a lot. Even an old version or the basic photoshop elements can do this, all you need is the ability to edit in layers. A half hour tutorial once you had it, and you'd be up and running!

I've used this technique for just about every family portrait I've shot the past couple years. No more blinking, everyone is always smiling whether you've got 5 people or 40 people in the image. Just need one good expression from each person, and you're set! :)


My flickr (external link) | Gear + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
Nov 28, 2011 22:47 |  #19

I like the the ones (on Flickr) you did not like best.... :) Family in action.... But the end result is certainly Christmas-card quality. Just a bit of processing as already suggested (up the exposure a bit and tone done the white dress at the same time. Probably a bit of "fill light" to see if you can get yourself off the background.

I find that to get my dogs attention some treats on a saucer or in a bag dangling under the camera, will help to make her "eager" and watching the lens.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 29, 2011 02:10 |  #20

SimpleJack wrote in post #13460983 (external link)
The dogs need to smile more. Try shaking a plastic bag or something to make them open there eyes and look forward. The family looks pretty good, maybe a little closer together next time? Not allot, just a tiny bit

My very first thought when I looked at the image.....:D

Frugal wrote in post #13461245 (external link)
For something that's high degree of difficulty you did well. But to do better you needed a back/hair/rim light. People call it different things but it would have lit the shoulders and hair of your subjects and prevented the black hair and sweater of the man at the right from blending into the black background.

HTH

The second thing I saw - the hair is disappearing into the background. Need some light to separate the hair for the BG.

To get all those folks and the dogs together in one frame and shoot the image is about a super human effort. I would think based on degree of difficulty and execution this shot is a winner.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 29, 2011 08:07 |  #21

I think you did a reasonably good job; self-portraits aren't even to do if you don't have a wireless remote or an intervalometer.

The background can be fixed in post with a little masking.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Nov 29, 2011 08:13 |  #22

Sheldon N wrote in post #13466258 (external link)
You should look into getting photoshop, it can help out a lot. Even an old version or the basic photoshop elements can do this, all you need is the ability to edit in layers. A half hour tutorial once you had it, and you'd be up and running!

I've used this technique for just about every family portrait I've shot the past couple years. No more blinking, everyone is always smiling whether you've got 5 people or 40 people in the image. Just need one good expression from each person, and you're set! :)

Oh I have photoshop elements, I just can't seem to get my head around it. I need to spend some time with it I guess.


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Nov 29, 2011 08:19 |  #23

Titus213 wrote in post #13466939 (external link)
My very first thought when I looked at the image.....:D

The second thing I saw - the hair is disappearing into the background. Need some light to separate the hair for the BG.

To get all those folks and the dogs together in one frame and shoot the image is about a super human effort. I would think based on degree of difficulty and execution this shot is a winner.

Thanks Titus! One of the things I did in Aperture was darken my rapidly balding scalp a little. Photographically, I know my hair shouldn't disappear into the background. However, my vanity overrides a bit and likes that you can't see my thinning hairline.

I like the idea of a strip light though. I think that will be my next purchase, after I upgrade my slow computer so I can do more editing.

I'm constantly overwhelmed at the vast bank of knowledge this forum provides. I came here three years ago not knowing the difference between aperture and shutter speed and now I can walk into a camera store and sling the lingo like a seasoned vet! Thanks guys.


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Nov 29, 2011 08:21 |  #24

Sheldon N wrote in post #13465531 (external link)
Nicely done. I agree with the prior poster on using a rim/hair light. A gridded strip box above is great for that.

You'll get better expressions if you plan out the shot/posing and then shoot it as a composite image and assemble in Photoshop. Shoot lots of frames with your family to get them looking on camera, then shoot a couple shots with yourself in the frame with the self timer or remote release.

I did our own family portrait yesterday with the same approach. This is a composite of three frames:

QUOTED IMAGE

One light on background, stripbox above for hair light and big Octa for key light (all Elinchrom).

So to be clear, you are cutting and pasting people from various photographs together? Or just their heads? Not sure I'm clear on how you did this.


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Nov 29, 2011 08:28 |  #25

You can take elements for other photos like eyes or smiles and add them to a particular photo you like. Reasonably simple to do in Photoshop or Photoshop Elements.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sheldon ­ N
Goldmember
Avatar
2,164 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Nov 29, 2011 11:36 as a reply to  @ PixelMagic's post |  #26

mckinleypics wrote in post #13467769 (external link)
So to be clear, you are cutting and pasting people from various photographs together? Or just their heads? Not sure I'm clear on how you did this.

It's sort of like cutting/pasting heads, but just a little more sophisticated.

First, I try to shoot so that the posing doesn't change much between frames. It's much harder to "put the puzzle together" if everything is different between images. Once the images are shot, then my workflow looks like this...

  • Open all the images and paste them on top of each other creating a stack of multiple layers.
  • Using the "eyeball icon" turn off the visibility of unwanted layers so you are only working with one layer at a time.
  • Use the opacity slider on the top layer to set it at 50% opacity. You will be able to see both images at once.
  • Move the top layer into position (control + click/drag) so that it lines up with the underlying layer. Think about where you want your seams to be. Zooming to 100% view helps you position it exactly.
  • Set the opacity back to 100%.
  • Add a layer mask to the top layer. (See the white box appear next to the layer, this is your layer mask)
  • Invert the layer mask (Control + I). This will make the layer mask turn black and make the top layer "invisible".
  • Use a paintbrush with a soft edge (Hardness = 0) and paint on the layer mask (make sure you've clicked on it to highlight it as the active area) using white to "paint in" the top layer image on top of the bottom layer. With a layer mask, painting with white will allow the top layer to show through and cover up the bottom layer. Anything that is black on the layer mask will block the top layer from appearing at all, and shades of gray will partially reveal the top. The quick memory tip is "White reveals, black conceals."
  • If you make a mistake while painting on the layer mask, hit the "X" key to toggle between painting with white or painting with black. You can paint black over your error and then toggle back to white to paint it in again.
  • I will usually start out with big brush strokes to get the main subject into the picture, then zoom in with smaller and smaller brushes to touch up the details so the overlap looks natural. Sometimes you need to "fade" the blend in with big soft brush strokes, and other times it needs to be a hard edge line with precise brush work.
  • Toggle the top layer on and off (eyeball icon) to help you see where any overlap errors might be.
  • Repeat the above process for the next image layer, until everyone is in the photo and looking how you want them to.
I made a little animated gif to show where the blends on my image were. The tricky spot was blending the transition between my leg and my son's hand to look natural, and blending my wife's shoulder/arm/sweater (basically a seam down the middle of her torso).

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v483/sheldonnalos/250R2666-Edit-2.gif

My flickr (external link) | Gear + Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mckinleypics
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,809 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
     
Nov 29, 2011 15:17 |  #27

Thanks so much! I have some serious learning to do!


Dave
7D, 70-200mm 2.8 L IS, 24-70mm 2.8 L, 50mm 1.4, Tokina 11-16mm 2.8, 580EXII
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
irishman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,098 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
Nov 30, 2011 11:58 |  #28

Hey---they are good enough for Christmas cards, now get 'em in the mail!


6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1safecracker
Member
Avatar
64 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Dec 01, 2011 23:07 |  #29

You should make the 2nd one your Christmas card pic --- most people would relate to it more :) all things considered the 1st one aint too bad of an accomplishment!


---------------
gripped 7d,gripped 5dII,580exII,24ex,Toki​na 12-24,Tamron sp af 90mm,canon 28-135 IS,24-70L,70-200L 2.8 IS II,Tamron sp 70-300 di vc, other stuff......

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,658 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Self Family Portrait - CC Please
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
558 guests, 153 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.