Yes. I've got LR3 on my work PC as well as my home Mac. The disc will install on either, which is very nice!
Nov 30, 2011 11:54 | #16 Yes. I've got LR3 on my work PC as well as my home Mac. The disc will install on either, which is very nice! Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 11:54 | #17 rhommel wrote in post #13474333 so you can use the same license from PC to MAC? thanks! I'm not sure but I doubt it. The license usually lets you put the software on multiple computers but different versions might be a stretch. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 11:55 | #18 Ooops - spoke too soon! Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 11:56 | #19 mckinleypics wrote in post #13474340 I hear you. However, one of the things I'm kicking myself for is not going whole hog when I bought this iMac 4 years ago. Now the processor is outdated. I suppose going whole hog buys another year or two so it may be a horse apiece, so to speak. Here's the system I'm looking at: 27" iMac - 2549 3.4 GHz Quad Cor Intel i7 8G ram 2TB serial ATA hard drive AMD Radeon 1Gb graphics card There is also a Wacom Bamboo Capture Graphics Tablet (100) I could skip, the applecare protection plan (169) I could skip but admittedly use a lot, and a printer for (100) that I don't need but comes with a 100 rebate so it is free. I know what you mean. I personally wouldn't buy the ram from Apple, and I would just use the 1TB hard drive and get a Firewire external drive. I have 3 of the 2TB flavor. Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 12:10 | #20 Before you go that far, you might try backing up all your stuff, and doing a complete wipe and reinstall of Snow Leopard or Lion. Make sure to uninstall/un-register Photoshop so you can re-use the license. http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
m-industry Member 59 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Ottawa ON More info | Nov 30, 2011 12:15 | #21 mckinleypics wrote in post #13473641 I did this already. Unfortunately, I did it wrong so now I have 2g on one slot and 4 on the other. This error was pointed out to me on the phone with the apple sales lady. She said I could drop it down to 2 and 2 and it would be a bit faster but my 667 Mhz DDR2 processor is the weak link. She said that it is the minimum required to run Aperture. Every brush stroke I make takes a few seconds to show up. You can imagine how long PP takes at this rate. Dave, have you ever tried running Lightroom on your imac to test the performance (not trying to convince you to switch software, I swear!!)? I used to use Aperture and it bogged down my computer just as you described. Ever since I made the switch to Lightroom, I have no performance issues at all - I can quickly skim through my entire library and edit photos without any lag. Manson |flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise Awaiting the title ferry... More info | Nov 30, 2011 12:59 | #22 I have about a 4 year old macbook pro (external monitor), it is maxed out on everything and I put in a SSD. lately it gets bogged down just typing text from time to time. There is a short delay. I looked at my activity monitor and it looks like there are 100 things running. Is that normal? Not sure how many are idle but from me there are only about 10. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 13:48 | #23 digital paradise wrote in post #13474636 I have about a 4 year old macbook pro (external monitor), it is maxed out on everything and I put in a SSD. lately it gets bogged down just typing text from time to time. There is a short delay. I looked at my activity monitor and it looks like there are 100 things running. Is that normal? Not sure how many are idle but from me there are only about 10. I repair disk permissions regularly. I have seen this Mac Cleaner advertises but I don't anything about it. Any suggestions? By the way DPP is the worst for choking the system. But it is odd because many times it is fine and then it cats up. Any suggestions besides a new machine? DON'T DO MAC CLEANER!!!! It is Malware - one of the few that have been developed for mac. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 13:51 | #24 m-industry wrote in post #13474455 Dave, have you ever tried running Lightroom on your imac to test the performance (not trying to convince you to switch software, I swear!!)? I used to use Aperture and it bogged down my computer just as you described. Ever since I made the switch to Lightroom, I have no performance issues at all - I can quickly skim through my entire library and edit photos without any lag. I'm running a mid 2007 white macbook: 2.16 dual core intel, 2+2GB RAM (although I think it maxes out at ~3GB). This might be a cheaper route to take, we can enjoy outdated technology together ![]() I have not tried LR. Maybe I should try that first? I'm running a 2.8 Ghz dual core intel. Perhaps cleaning and LR are worth a shot... Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 13:52 | #25 You can do a LR trial for free. Canon EOS M6 Mark II - EOS R5
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcluckie I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once! 2,192 posts Gallery: 109 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 449 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area More info | Nov 30, 2011 13:54 | #26 digital paradise wrote in post #13474636 I have about a 4 year old macbook pro (external monitor), it is maxed out on everything and I put in a SSD. lately it gets bogged down just typing text from time to time. There is a short delay. I looked at my activity monitor and it looks like there are 100 things running. Is that normal? Not sure how many are idle but from me there are only about 10. I repair disk permissions regularly. I have seen this Mac Cleaner advertises but I don't anything about it. Any suggestions? By the way DPP is the worst for choking the system. But it is odd because many times it is fine and then it cats up. Any suggestions besides a new machine? This is normal, if you're talking about "loaded" items, like Dock and event helpers. There are many background items that don't take much, if any, system resources at all, but are listed in the Activity Monitor, even with % cpu activity. Hence the need for lots of RAM these days. You should be sure to disable crap like dashboard apps. multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digitalparadise Awaiting the title ferry... More info | Nov 30, 2011 13:59 | #27 mckinleypics wrote in post #13474883 DON'T DO MAC CLEANER!!!! It is Malware - one of the few that have been developed for mac. Thanks. I was not comfortable with it. Seemed wishy washy. I just spoke to one of the reps at My Mac Dealer and my activity monitor is showing most of the the open items are on 0 for usage. He said he'd take a quick look at it tomorrow. Image Editing OK
LOG IN TO REPLY |
toxic Goldmember 3,498 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2008 Location: California More info | Nov 30, 2011 14:14 | #28 mckinleypics wrote in post #13473641 I did this already. Unfortunately, I did it wrong so now I have 2g on one slot and 4 on the other. This error was pointed out to me on the phone with the apple sales lady. She said I could drop it down to 2 and 2 and it would be a bit faster but my 2.8 g dual core processor is the weak link. She said that it is the minimum required to run Aperture. Every brush stroke I make takes a few seconds to show up. You can imagine how long PP takes at this rate. 2 and 2 would not be faster than 2 and 4. Anything over 4GB would get swapped to the hard drive, which is a thousand times slower than RAM. Compare that to the 3% speed gain using dual channel memory and you can see why dual/triple/quad channel means nothing for most applications. mckinleypics wrote in post #13474340 I hear you. However, one of the things I'm kicking myself for is not going whole hog when I bought this iMac 4 years ago. Now the processor is outdated. All of the processors from four years ago are outdated. Buying a top-of-the-line processor for "future-proofing" is false logic.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcluckie I play with fire, run with scissors and skate on thin ice all at once! 2,192 posts Gallery: 109 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 449 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Hong Kong, Ozarks, previously Chicago area More info | Nov 30, 2011 14:38 | #29 toxic is right on everything that i know to be. also mckinleypics in that you don't need the top processor. and true that putting in your own RAM and hd are the way to go (see OWC at macsales.com). multidisciplinary visual guy, professor of visual art, irresponsible and salty.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2011 15:59 | #30 I use a 2T LaCie for my photo library. I think cleaning is in order but I'm going forward with the new iMac nonetheless. My kids are getting old enough where they need access for school and a second one would be beneficial anyway. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 559 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||