I had the Sigma and returned it for inconsistency. It's sharp when it focuses. Yes could be more sharp wide open. But I can't deal with inconsistent lens.
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 10, 2013 21:51 | #5536 I had the Sigma and returned it for inconsistency. It's sharp when it focuses. Yes could be more sharp wide open. But I can't deal with inconsistent lens. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DELBOi Member  81 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Pampanga, Philippines More info | Apr 11, 2013 04:05 | #5537  Camera: Canon EOS 7D Exposure: 1/2500 sec Aperture: f/4.0 Focal Length: 35 mm ISO Speed: 100  Camera: Canon EOS 7D Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/800) Aperture: f/4.5 Focal Length: 35 mm ISO Speed: 100 DelBoi Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Furinox Member 233 posts Likes: 5 Joined Apr 2011 More info | Apr 11, 2013 08:26 | #5538 vinmunoz wrote in post #15814271  I had the Sigma and returned it for inconsistency. It's sharp when it focuses. Yes could be more sharp wide open. But I can't deal with inconsistent lens. This is the only thing that has kept me from switching. I always want the sharpest lens available, but I won't sacrifice reliability for it since I photograph events. In all reality a client isn't going to notice the sharpness or bokeh difference between the lenses so I'd rather go with the one that is going to focus correctly every time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 11, 2013 08:33 | #5539 AHWagner wrote in post #15813747 Pine Trees [03.29.13] by Andrew H Wagner | AHWagner Photo, on FlickrPine Trees [03.29.13] by Andrew H Wagner | AHWagner Photo, on FlickrThese are nice. I'm on the web here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AHWagner Goldmember  2,590 posts Likes: 27 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Maryland More info | Apr 11, 2013 08:37 | #5540 Foolish wrote in post #15815394 These are nice. Thank you! www.andrewhwagner.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuzzSummit Senior Member  882 posts Likes: 549 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Apr 11, 2013 10:58 | #5541 Shot @ f/1.6 on a 5D2:  Istiklal Caddesi by FuzzSummit, on FlickrWebsite
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dezl_dub Senior Member 324 posts Likes: 21 Joined Mar 2008 Location: San Luis Obispo, CA More info |
Encrypted Senior Member  587 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Orlando, FL More info | Apr 12, 2013 02:16 | #5543  IMG_8292 by mchen397, on Flickr IMG_8278 by mchen397, on Flickr IMG_8443 by mchen397, on Flickr IMG_8284 by mchen397, on FlickrCanon 5D3 | 135 f/2.0L | 35 f/1.4L | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dankata Cream of the Crop  More info | One of my last shoots with this lens as I just bought the Sigma and will sell this, hope it is worth the change because this is an awesome lens  L&P by Daniel Stoychev Photography, on Flickr-Daniel-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 12, 2013 12:38 | #5545 Encrypted wrote in post #15818683 IMG_8292 by mchen397, on Flickr Really like this one  Flower by 2slo7, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AHWagner Goldmember 2,590 posts Likes: 27 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Maryland More info | Apr 12, 2013 12:40 | #5546  Shasta-Trinity National Forest [03.29.13] by Andrew H Wagner | AHWagner Photo, on Flickrwww.andrewhwagner.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Maffu Senior Member  284 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Hertfordshire, UK. More info | Apr 12, 2013 16:06 | #5547 Very seriously considering moving my 28 and 50 on for a 35L. I need sharper 1.4-1.8 performance. Photos in this thread sure are a selling point! 6D | 7D | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember  More info | Apr 12, 2013 16:40 | #5548 Dankata wrote in post #15820287 One of my last shoots with this lens as I just bought the Sigma and will sell this, hope it is worth the change because this is an awesome lens I will be interested in hearing if you have any issues with the Sigma. Steve -- Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 12, 2013 18:34 | #5549 Dankata wrote in post #15820287 One of my last shoots with this lens as I just bought the Sigma and will sell this, hope it is worth the change because this is an awesome lens Just curious, but you have so many fantastic photos with this lens, why even bother selling? I just bought the Sigma myself, but still, just curious if you felt something was missing with the Canon. Gear: 5D3, 135L, Sigma 35, 50 1.8 STM, 16-35 F/4L IS, 85/1.8, Fujifilm X100T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vinmunoz Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 12, 2013 18:38 | #5550 We'll miss you here Dankata but i'm hoping you'll get lucky to get a good copy of the sigma the first time. Bought one and returned. | SONY A7SIII(2) | A73 | A6000 | Sony A7IV | Sigma105 | FE1635F4 | Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 | Tamron 17-28 Tamron 28-75 | FE50F1.8 | Sony 16035F4PZ | SEL30mm F3.5 Macro | Canon 24mm TSE | Laowa 15mm Shift
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1176 guests, 117 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
