hi all,
could use some opinions on the best of these 3. obviously, different processing. any thoughts and/or advice...?
thanks very much,
sean
swetsastonic Senior Member 440 posts Joined Sep 2010 More info | Dec 06, 2011 00:02 | #1 hi all,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CactusJuice Senior Member 853 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Dec 06, 2011 01:21 | #2 #1 I guess, but none of them are interesting. Can you reshoot it? Maybe get up tighter on the big tree. And do it either early morning or late afternoon. And maybe try to get some clouds.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bluedogs Senior Member 567 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Canberra More info | I would suggest, from only a choice of those 3, option 1. I am also not a fan though. Lacks a focal point. There is too many things fighting for attention. Equipment: Canon 7D, Canon 24-70mm 2.8L II USM, Canon 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS USM , Canon 50mm 1.4, Canon 10-22mm, Canon 2x Extender III, 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2011 06:53 | #4 thank you. I just learned about what distance can do to the relative size of the background, so I'd like to go back and play around with getting in tighter, etc. think they're closed for the year, so it won't be soon, though...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
johnfcovin Hatchling 1 post Joined Jul 2009 Location: New Hope, PA, USA More info | Dec 12, 2011 15:43 | #5 I have been drawn to scenes similar to this one, so I can relate to trying capture what you were seeing. I do like the road's diagonal path across the scene. I have found myself in situations such as this walking in a circle around the tree looking for a way to tie the other objects in the scene to the tree somehow. I also agree with the prior comment about shooting in early morning or late afternoon light, with fog, or some other mood invoking mixture...as for the options, the vibrant colors are necessary to distinguish the various objects in the pix. Trial and error. Stay with color and try many variations on the placement of the tree in your pix.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember 2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Dec 12, 2011 20:15 | #6 I like #1 the best because of the colors. 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 12, 2011 21:55 | #7 I might try to crop as a square on the tree-side. Less sky or less ground, but make a choice between them. Then perhaps the processing on (3) with a touch more contrast or maybe push the highlights. I picked (3) because processing is the option to improve the shot, I think, rather than realism from colors. Not sure if any of that will work, but that's what I'd try. Later, X100T XT3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 15, 2011 10:15 | #8 great pointers, all. thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1386 guests, 178 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||