Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 06 Dec 2011 (Tuesday) 00:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

which one...?

 
swetsastonic
Senior Member
440 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Dec 06, 2011 00:02 |  #1

hi all,

could use some opinions on the best of these 3. obviously, different processing. any thoughts and/or advice...?

thanks very much,

sean

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c204/careysean/IMG_4355.jpg

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c204/careysean/IMG_4355-3.jpg

IMAGE: http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c204/careysean/IMG_4355-2.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CactusJuice
Senior Member
853 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Dec 06, 2011 01:21 |  #2

#1 I guess, but none of them are interesting. Can you reshoot it? Maybe get up tighter on the big tree. And do it either early morning or late afternoon. And maybe try to get some clouds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bluedogs
Senior Member
567 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canberra
     
Dec 06, 2011 02:59 as a reply to  @ CactusJuice's post |  #3

I would suggest, from only a choice of those 3, option 1. I am also not a fan though. Lacks a focal point. There is too many things fighting for attention.


Equipment: Canon 7D, Canon 24-70mm 2.8L II USM, Canon 100-400mm 4.5-5.6L IS USM , Canon 50mm 1.4, Canon 10-22mm, Canon 2x Extender III, 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swetsastonic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
440 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Dec 06, 2011 06:53 |  #4

thank you. I just learned about what distance can do to the relative size of the background, so I'd like to go back and play around with getting in tighter, etc. think they're closed for the year, so it won't be soon, though...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnfcovin
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jul 2009
Location: New Hope, PA, USA
     
Dec 12, 2011 15:43 |  #5

I have been drawn to scenes similar to this one, so I can relate to trying capture what you were seeing. I do like the road's diagonal path across the scene. I have found myself in situations such as this walking in a circle around the tree looking for a way to tie the other objects in the scene to the tree somehow. I also agree with the prior comment about shooting in early morning or late afternoon light, with fog, or some other mood invoking mixture...as for the options, the vibrant colors are necessary to distinguish the various objects in the pix. Trial and error. Stay with color and try many variations on the placement of the tree in your pix.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TGrundvig
Goldmember
Avatar
2,876 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
     
Dec 12, 2011 20:15 |  #6

I like #1 the best because of the colors.

#2 doesn't have enough contrast for B&W, it needs more black, which just isn't present.

#3 looks a little flat.

The scene is not real interesting, which is why I like #1 best. The colors help keep my attention better. Personally, I think I would have shot from the path and used that as my leading line and use the large tree to the left as my subject. I would hope on the distant trees in color to draw the attention further into the image. This is just a guess as I was not there, so I have no idea if that would have worked or not. But, I think the path with the green grass along the side of it would have made for a good leading line for the eye to follow.


1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GlimmerMan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,945 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9241
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Houston, TX USA
     
Dec 12, 2011 21:55 |  #7

I might try to crop as a square on the tree-side. Less sky or less ground, but make a choice between them. Then perhaps the processing on (3) with a touch more contrast or maybe push the highlights. I picked (3) because processing is the option to improve the shot, I think, rather than realism from colors. Not sure if any of that will work, but that's what I'd try. Later,


X100T XT3
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swetsastonic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
440 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Dec 15, 2011 10:15 |  #8

great pointers, all. thank you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,454 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
which one...?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1386 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.