What is the difference between
KENKO Teleplus Pro 300 DGX *1.4
and
The KENKO TelePlus MC4 AF 1.4X DGX*
is there any different in the image quality ?
Thanks
moltengold Goldmember 4,296 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2011 More info | Dec 07, 2011 00:18 | #1 What is the difference between | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2011 00:32 | #2 And why the kenko pro had from up 11 pin contacts | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2011 06:39 | #3 Any one knows ? | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2011 07:07 | #4 The Pro 300 is higher quality with better coating and I think more lens elements. It also is a reporting TC meaning it will report correct fl and aperture. SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2011 07:19 | #5 gabebalazs wrote in post #13507656 The Pro 300 is higher quality with better coating and I think more lens elements. It also is a reporting TC meaning it will report correct fl and aperture. the mc4 dgx is the least expensive currently AFAIK, it is "only" 4 elements. Although 8 pin, it is still a reporting tc due to some electronic trickery that was introduced in this new DGX series. You may get more CA with the mc4 dgx, however due to copy variations it may actually turn out to be sharper than the 300 Pro (like in the German Traumflieger TC shootout test.) Thank you so much for help | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 22,948 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15518 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Dec 07, 2011 07:56 | #6 According to the Traumflieger test the Pro 300 DG does a bit better in the center than the MC4. However, it does a bit worse off center and a great deal worse at the edges. So overall the MC4 did better in the test, even beating the Canon 1.4x II and III (although by a hair). Which is why I bought the MC4. However, I am not enthusiastic about the thing and use it as little as possible. Maybe I just have a bad copy... Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2011 08:08 | #7 Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #13507780 According to the Traumflieger test the Pro 300 DG does a bit better in the center than the MC4. However, it does a worse off center and a great deal worse at the edges. So overall the MC4 did better in the test, even beating the Canon 1.4x II and III (although by a hair). Which is why I bought the MC4. However, I am not enthusiastic about the thing and use it as little as possible. Maybe I just have a bad copy... Thanks a lot | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 07, 2011 10:35 | #8 Thanks again | Canon EOS | and some canon lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1339 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||