Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
Thread started 07 Dec 2011 (Wednesday) 11:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Cougar to far away... AARRRGGHH

 
Huntbear
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Dec 07, 2011 11:26 |  #1

Ok, so I was out driving around with a friend, and I looked out in this field and there was a cat standing broadside about 400 yds away. It never left, never ran, it actually laid down in the grass, after about 10 min. of standing there.

My lens would not reach, :cry::cry::cry: the pictures I did take are terrible. All you can tell is that it is a cat. At 400 yds. what lens would I need to be able to bring that cat in and make a great photo?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobOh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,157 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
     
Dec 07, 2011 11:32 |  #2

400 yards is an awful long distance to take a wildlife picture. I have a 100-400 zoom and I don't think I could take that picture with that lens. So, I'm thinking 500 or up, maybe even with a teleconverter, but also certainly on a tripod or at the very least a monopod.


Regards,
Bob
Gear: 40D, 7D, EF 100-400L, EF 28-135, Speedlight 580EX and other stuff.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bobbolew/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Dec 07, 2011 12:15 |  #3

Agreed it is a long ways away. I was using a 300 mm. And it just would not even begin t bring it in. I was thinking a 400 mm with a 2x converter maybe? I am not sure...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Dec 07, 2011 12:17 |  #4

Oh, and it was a sunny afternoon, the kitty was in the sun as well. Would have made a great shot. I am thinking it had a kill right there in the brush close by.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Dec 07, 2011 12:22 |  #5

1200mm and probably at 2x TC to get a decent shot from that far away, I'd imagine. That's a terribly long way to try and take a picture with any lens (short of the Hubble, maybe) :p


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Dec 07, 2011 12:47 |  #6

At 400 yards, I have a hard time seeing a BARN, let alone a cat!

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Dec 07, 2011 14:02 |  #7

snyderman wrote in post #13509008 (external link)
At 400 yards, I have a hard time seeing a BARN, let alone a cat!

dave

Well I am a hunter as well as a photographer, so seeing wildlife at long range is kind of ingrained in me. I can spot elk on a hillside a mile or more away without binoculars, easily.

I am wondering if I purchased an adapter for my 60X spotting scope if that would maybe help. Would be cheaper than the thousands for a 800 - 1200 mm lens.

I would have been able to get within 50 yds. of the cat but the little gravel road the went out that direction was posted by the Bureau of Reclamation as No Trespassing.... not sure how that works but did not want to chance getting arrested for a cat photo.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BobOh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,157 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Central Wisconsin
     
Dec 08, 2011 11:49 |  #8

Huntbear wrote in post #13509305 (external link)
I am wondering if I purchased an adapter for my 60X spotting scope if that would maybe help. Would be cheaper than the thousands for a 800 - 1200 mm lens.

That might be the ticket. Search digiscoping on this forum. Some folks have done some dynamite work with that.


Regards,
Bob
Gear: 40D, 7D, EF 100-400L, EF 28-135, Speedlight 580EX and other stuff.
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bobbolew/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8384
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Dec 09, 2011 00:15 |  #9

Huntbear wrote in post #13508660 (external link)
At 400 yds. what lens would I need to be able to bring that cat in and make a great photo?

A great photo? At 400 yards?
There is no lens that would give you a great photo at that range. At such a far range, you are dealing with a lot more than telephoto capabilities of the lens (or telescope).
You have a lot of stuff in the air between your sensor and the subject. Dust. Water vapor. Heat diffusion. No matter how great the optics or magnification abilities of the lens, telescope, or spotting scope you use, any images you take at that range will fall far, far short of "great".

Here is a well-written article of the effectiveness (or lack thereof) of long range wildlife photography with long telephoto lenses:
http://franzfoto.wordp​ress.com …-is-great-lens-sometimes/ (external link)


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Dec 09, 2011 00:57 |  #10

Well first of all 400 yds is nearly impossible to shoot and get a useful shot, it's just too far. 2nd the cat felt safe enough from you If he smelled or saw you to lay down, you were no real threat. Even the very best photographer / hunter knows that you would have to close the gap to a few hundred feet at best. Dust, moisture, temp would all have a negative effect on any image. Remember that long glass magnifies everything good and bad. Most importantly of all is safety. Getting that close to a large cat is foolish. They are not like other animals. Even bears are somewhat predictble. Cats are not. Cats stock and kill from the rear. They are incredibly fast, and rarely attack in bright light. But for every "rule" there are exceptions. Best to leave them alone unless you are in a well protected vehicle. In Santa Cruz, CA we have lots of them and they have sightings in suburban and urban areas - more and more often.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
noodle_snacks
Senior Member
258 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Dec 09, 2011 03:17 |  #11

Heat haze can become a problem after 10 meters, let alone 400 (1m ~ 1 yd), with a 500mm on a hot day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Dec 09, 2011 23:39 |  #12

Thanks for all the help I appreciate it.

LBaldwin, I have been up close and personal with Cougars in the woods, I know all about them. It would not bother me to stalk within a hundred feet or so. Besides, I am never in the woods without a sidearm. For both the 4 legged and 2 legged predators that walk around. I will work on maybe finding access and doing some calling from a blind. Get the kitty up close.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Dec 10, 2011 01:42 |  #13

Luckily, most large cats see you well before you see them. I also have direct experience with Mountain Lions here in the Bay Area. Their habitat is shrinking while the number of cats grow. They have no natural predators in this area, other than man. While actual attacks are rare here, close encounters are common as are sightings in and around homes. Just a few years ago we had a large male >150 lbs sit in some ladies tree, in Palo Alto. The cops had to shoot to kill and used a 5.56 and shot through both lungs. The cat jumped from the tree and ran 200+ yds and died under a bush at another home. Of course 5.56 is not the right round for a kill like that, and the cop that did it learned quickly that the rifle is not always the right answer. She had zero hunting experience. All I would say is that to be careful and aware of your surroundings and always leave yourself an out that does not involve killing the animal if possible. I used to teach that a 300 mm lens gets you a 6' bear at about 75 ft. A 600mm lens gets you 150 ft for a 6' tall bear. Of course there are varibles involved but the better the distance the better the chance of escape if needed.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Huntbear
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
79 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Washington State
     
Dec 10, 2011 14:02 |  #14

Thanks for the heads up... and always, Safety is most important.... And a 5.56 is a great cat gun if you head shoot them. Otherwise a shotgun works so much better at close range.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Dec 17, 2011 21:57 as a reply to  @ Huntbear's post |  #15

I shoot long range high power rifle sometimes (1000 yds) and mirage is an issue even in cool weather.
I agree that 400 yds is too far for a picture.
Stalking up is the only option.
Good luck and be safe.



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,375 views & 2 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Cougar to far away... AARRRGGHH
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Wildlife 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1144 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.