Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Dec 2011 (Friday) 13:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ok I need advice on my workflow

 
AltgnJoey
Senior Member
Avatar
885 posts
Likes: 128
Joined Sep 2011
     
Dec 09, 2011 13:09 |  #1

This is what I've been doing.

1. Get pics off of cam by using the usb transfer with eos utilities.

2. Take pics into Lightroom and pp in there.

3. Take finished product from Lightroom and send it to photoshop through the edit photo function.

4. In photoshop I do my selective sharpening first.

5. Next step is I resize the image by goin to resize image and I usually just type in a 1920X whatever.

6. Last step I save the image as a jpeg with the best quality possible.

My q is am I doin anything wrong in the order of things? should I resize the image first once in photoshop or am I doin things correctly.

What about my conversion to jpeg, is this the correct way to do it or is there a better way? I read about people using save for web but i've always just saved the image as in the format i want and chose the quality.


https://500px.com/jose​ph-kurtz (external link)
www.josephkurtzphotogr​aphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 09, 2011 13:52 |  #2

I don't know about "wrong" -- are you doing this for the Web only, or for clients or, ?

A consideration -- as to "I save the image as a jpeg with the best quality possible", if this is just for the Web then it's probably overkill. It's fine for printing, but a jpeg quality of, say, 8/80 will typically be just as good as 10/100.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Dec 09, 2011 15:04 |  #3

Nothing wrong that I can see :) If it were me, I would edit the RAW's, batch process them so that they all automatically are made into JPEG's at whatever size you desire and then apply any sharpening they may need to the final JPEG's.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,925 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2270
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Dec 09, 2011 15:37 |  #4

I do my sharpening as the last thing.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 09, 2011 15:46 |  #5

For the above purposes, is sharpening in Photoshop really going to be that much better than appropriate sharpening in LR?


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 09, 2011 18:40 |  #6

The steps should be open in Photoshop, do processing, save. Then for each output size you resize then sharpen. Sharpening is always last.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cagenuts
Senior Member
Avatar
860 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
     
Dec 09, 2011 23:48 |  #7

As Tim says, when you are finished sharpening in PS, do nothing else but click 'save' then 'close' and the file will be brought back into Lightroom as a full size TIFF. You then have the versatility of exporting AND output sharpening depending on size and medium.


...Ask me anything, I'm an ultracrepidarian.
Hilton
_______________
C A N O N | 6D | Σ f/1.4 | 24-70 f/4 | 70-200 f/2.8 II | Kenko Pro300 DGX 1.4 TC |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AltgnJoey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
885 posts
Likes: 128
Joined Sep 2011
     
Dec 10, 2011 15:35 |  #8

Thanks for the information guys.


https://500px.com/jose​ph-kurtz (external link)
www.josephkurtzphotogr​aphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luxury
Senior Member
Avatar
635 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Dec 11, 2011 02:26 |  #9

you know, you can import directly from your camera through lightroom. It's what I've been doing with my 5d2 cause I'm short on a card-reader right now.

Pretty convenient, would reduce the steps too.

Also, I would make an action for resize and sharpening. Say you know you're going to be doing a bunch of 1920x or 1080x wide images (which are overkill for web size, i tend to stick to 900 on the short end, but even that tends to be too much), you could set it to sharpen using your preferred method, and then resize, and also export as jpg.

I have an action set up to do a resize and export, and then it just asks me where to save and what to name it.


Liam - A7r, Fuji x100, 450d and some other stuff. --- Flickr  (external link)--- http://liamgee.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Dec 11, 2011 17:12 |  #10

That's a good point - I always import from the card into Lightroom, and do some preliminary culling during the import process. You can make import presets for naming and keywording if you often shoot similar subjects.

If you want to get really fancy, you can automate some of your processing upon import as well - such as applying noise reduction based on ISO.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,685 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Ok I need advice on my workflow
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1454 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.