D4

maverick678 wrote in post #13644753
Hahahaha but it will be better than 1Dx at 12800 .

Bah! Canon has dual joysticks!! :p

jdizzle wrote in post #13644887
Bah! Canon has dual joysticks!! :p

Now hack it so you can play a flight simulator game on the back screen

vipergts831 wrote in post #13644870
But in the price is right that punk would say $1,001

true. it's been awhile since i watched that show.

You guys are too funny .

jdizzle wrote in post #13644887
Bah! Canon has dual joysticks!! :p

jwcdds wrote in post #13644863
Nikon's like that punk at the end of the Price-is-Right, where the person before says, "$1,000" and he responds by saying, "$999, Bob."

Canon says 51,200!
...Nikon yells, 102,400, Bob.

Canon says $6800!
...Nikon declares, $6000, Bob.

Canon shakes fists towards Nikon.

vipergts831 wrote in post #13644942
Now hack it so you can play a flight simulator game on the back screen

I foresee a canon price drop soon after release lol.

I forgot to add:

Canon says "Available in March!"
...Nikon yells, "February, Bob."

The unknown (and Canon's only potential, yet probably unlikely saving grace) would be the IQ between the two. Given Nikon's track record with the D3s... I'd give Nikon the slight edge at the moment.

IMO the D4 > 1dx all things considered.

The 5d III better be awesomely, awesome!

vipergts831 wrote in post #13644942
Now hack it so you can play a flight simulator game on the back screen

Or play Zelda!!!

kylyo wrote in post #13645704
IMO the D4 > 1dx all things considered.

How ya figure?

It's written in stone somewhere .

jwcdds wrote in post #13646107
How ya figure?

Being a non-pro/cheapskate and what I shoot I care about two things: price and high iso capabilities. For all practical purposes the cameras are gonna be very similar. AF, ergonomics, IQ (not 100% sure on that one), fps, extras. But the D4 is significantly cheaper and I would bet Nikon may be proven to have the edge with iso based on past performances.

But factor in the increase cost of Nikon glass, I suppose they are a wash.

I am more interested in the D800/5d III comparison, as I will realistically never own a pro level camera when it is the current model, but I will be upgrading to the 5d III if Canon delivers the goods.

I would never switch (well, never say never), I just hope Canon feels the heat from their competitors!

kylyo wrote in post #13646170
Being a non-pro/cheapskate and what I shoot I care about two things: price and high iso capabilities. For all practical purposes the cameras are gonna be very similar. AF, ergonomics, IQ (not 100% sure on that one), fps, extras. But the D4 is significantly cheaper and I would bet Nikon may be proven to have the edge with iso based on past performances.

But factor in the increase cost of Nikon glass, I suppose they are a wash.

I am more interested in the D800/5d III comparison, as I will realistically never own a pro level camera when it is the current model, but I will be upgrading to the 5d III if Canon delivers the goods.

I would never switch (well, never say never), I just hope Canon feels the heat from their competitors!

Its not a wash when canon's new lenses are more expensive than nikon's. This is getting interesting. I feel canon is slipping...

jwcdds wrote in post #13645547
I forgot to add:

Canon says "Available in March!"
...Nikon yells, "February, Bob."

Canon says "We will fix 5D3 auto focus!"
...Nikon yells, " We will fix D800 with 36MP and HD Vid, Bob."

Canikon

http://www.youtube.com …angbase#p/u/2/J​stJAxtubEA