I took these back in 2005. I found them while looking for other photos in one of my external hard drives. Thought?
Dec 12, 2011 20:28 | #1 I took these back in 2005. I found them while looking for other photos in one of my external hard drives. Thought? https://500px.com/chriskennedydotphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 13, 2011 00:10 | #2 The first one really jumps out for me. Comments, Questions, Observations Welcome
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bps Cream of the Crop 7,607 posts Likes: 406 Joined Mar 2007 Location: California More info | Dec 13, 2011 00:51 | #3 #1 is a very nice image! The 2nd one doesn't do much for me. Not enough foreground interest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
V-Wiz Goldmember  2,255 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Southern California More info | Dec 13, 2011 10:57 | #4 They are both very nice. The first one stood out for me. Gripped 5D Mark II l 24-105 F/4 L l 70-200 F/4 L l Tokina 12-24 F4 l 50mm 1.8 l Sigma 600 Mirror l B+W KSM CPL l B+W 6stop ND filter l Hitech 0.6 GND l YN-468 Flash l Kenko Pro 300 1.4 TC l Induro Tripod, Vanguard 250 Ballhead.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tomholman Goldmember  1,333 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: Austin Texas More info | Dec 13, 2011 12:47 | #5 |
BufordFZ1 Senior Member  622 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: NE GA More info | How in the world could you forget about these photo's???? A2, 60D, 5DII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Macjager Member 69 posts Joined Sep 2011 Location: europe and other places More info | I like them both, nice colours. Perhaps try a bit of cropping in #1, take out the dark foreground, leaving the yellow of the grass and take a bit off the top (
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 13, 2011 18:46 | #8 BufordFZ1 wrote in post #13539349  How in the world could you forget about these photo's???? That being said, #1 is a bit better to me, but #2 helps convey height and texture of the rock face. Im wondering the same thing myself. https://500px.com/chriskennedydotphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jaguar.yu Member 59 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Beijing,China More info | Dec 16, 2011 07:51 | #9 nice shots. Canon 5D, 24-105F/4L IS, 70-200 F/4 L IS; DMC LX3; Lumix GF1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EL_PIC Goldmember  2,028 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Austin Texas - Lucca Italy More info | Dec 16, 2011 07:55 | #10  Permanent banGood shots. EL_PIC - RIT BS Photo '78 - Photomask Engineering Mgr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Frank_Hollahan Goldmember  2,718 posts Likes: 97 Joined Feb 2005 More info | Dec 16, 2011 09:36 | #11 Both are nicely framed and the exposures are spot on, nice work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TGrundvig Goldmember  2,876 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Colorado More info | Dec 16, 2011 10:45 | #12 I like both of these a lot, good colors, good composition! 1Ds Mk II, 1D Mk II, 50D, 40D, XT (for my son), 17-40L, 24-105L, Bigma 50-500 EX DG, Sigma 150 Macro EX DG, Tokina 12-24 AT-X, Nifty Fifty, Tamron 28-300 (for my son), 580ex II, 430ex II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jed726 Member 35 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Dec 21, 2011 21:51 | #13 Both gorgeous new perspectives. Thanks for sharing!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 551 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
) You may also try to crop out the tree on the left. 