Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 14 Dec 2011 (Wednesday) 15:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Let's talk printers. How is the Canon Pixma 9500 Mark II?

 
JonK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,161 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2004
Location: PA USA
     
Dec 27, 2011 10:24 |  #16

tonylong wrote in post #13604733 (external link)
Without calibrating your monitor, you will always at best have an uncertain output. That's just the way it is. Even then, different monitors have different characteristics, but at least calibrating them can get them close to a "standard".

But, like you say, your prints can come out nicely. If they please you and others, well, that's what's important. Getting them to exactly match your monitor can be important for some types of photography, not so much for others. It does cost money to get a monitor that will "cooperate" and a calibrating system that will work well. it's up to you whether it's worth the expense.

One thing I don't see often addressed. When calibrating monitors, do the devices come with software to control what the video card outputs? Reason I ask - my monitor has no adjustment other than brightness on the actual monitor.


7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
check my blog:
www.jonkensy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 27, 2011 10:52 |  #17

Well, I'm not familiar with your monitor. Calibration is about getting the colors "right", according to a standard "scheme". Some calibrators do help with brightness, some less so. But I'd look more into your monitor documentation as to what you can adjust.

And then yes, calibrators have software to guide you through the process and to do some things internally in the computer. The result of the calibration is to create a profile that your graphics card can use along with "color managed" software such as Photoshop, Digital Photo Professional and other apps.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Dec 27, 2011 12:22 |  #18

JonK wrote in post #13604528 (external link)
Correct I use photoshop to manage the color profile and chooce the canon ICC profile for the paper being used on the 9500.

And you are disabling color management in the printer, right? I have found that colors are usually fine between calibrations, but what is really important is the brightness. Usually, what's appealing on the screen results in dark prints.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,161 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2004
Location: PA USA
     
Dec 27, 2011 16:05 |  #19

Tony-S wrote in post #13605189 (external link)
And you are disabling color management in the printer, right? I have found that colors are usually fine between calibrations, but what is really important is the brightness. Usually, what's appealing on the screen results in dark prints.

When you say "Disabling color management in the printer" what do you mean?

I just ordered a Spyder 3 Elite today should have it tomorrow - I guess I'll see if that helps me out!

Thanks for all of the input.


7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
check my blog:
www.jonkensy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Dec 27, 2011 16:41 |  #20

When you print from Photoshop and you have it set to "Photoshop Manages Color" and you click "Print", the printer's dialog box should appear next. In it, there should be a pull-down or some other setting that disables color management by the printer driver. In Mac OS X, this is called ColorSync. If you don't disable it, then the printer will reprofile the image and it will get screwed up in the final print.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,161 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2004
Location: PA USA
     
Dec 28, 2011 18:43 |  #21

Tony-S wrote in post #13606259 (external link)
When you print from Photoshop and you have it set to "Printer Manages Color" and you click "Print", the printer's dialog box should appear next. In it, there should be a pull-down or some other setting that disables color management by the printer driver. In Mac OS X, this is called ColorSync. If you don't disable it, then the printer will reprofile the image and it will get screwed up in the final print.

Hrm - i guess that's confusing. So you set PS/etc to let the printer manage, then it opens a dialog and you tell it to not let the printer manage? Seems... counter intuitive. Why wouldn't I want to let PS/etc manage and pick an ICC profile?


7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
check my blog:
www.jonkensy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Dec 28, 2011 19:24 |  #22

Sorry, I should have said "Photoshop Manages Color". I have fixed that in the previous post. Since you're on Windows, have a look at this thread:

https://photography-on-the.net …ighlight=colors​ync+tony-s


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
richard ­ c ­ powers
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Location: East Tennessee (Smokies Foothills)
     
Mar 05, 2012 17:33 |  #23

I have been using the 9500 since it came out. It has performed flawlessly in sharpness and color rendition. That is without doing any color calibrations whatsoever. It is expensive to operate as a set of inks cost $120 (B&H) Results are truly professional if you give it a professional image. If the convenience/quality is important and frequently print pictures, then I recommend this printer. I received a $500 rebate years ago from Canon toward the purchase of this printer when I bought a 50D and I was offered another$500 rebate again when I purchased the 7D. (From B and H Photo). So keep that in mind.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hard12find
Senior Member
Avatar
597 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
     
Mar 05, 2012 20:25 |  #24

I am looking forward to buying one of these in the near future, and am looking into CIS with pigmented inks...


20D, 10D, Fuji S-20, Mamiya C220 medium format, Sekonic L-508 meter, 2 alien bee 800's, AB remotes, Sigma 500 HS flash, 70-200 F2.8 L, Sigma 24-70 F2.8 EX DG, lots of glass, lots of stuff,8-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,811 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Let's talk printers. How is the Canon Pixma 9500 Mark II?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is vinceisvisual
1125 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.