Glad to see you got one of those great copies, precisely the reason mine is a keeper.
m3incorp Senior Member  989 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Colorado, USA More info | Nov 13, 2005 02:04 | #16 Glad to see you got one of those great copies, precisely the reason mine is a keeper. 7D, 10D, Canon EFS 18-55mm modded
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MaureenSouza Ms. MODERATOR Something Spectacular!  More info | Nov 13, 2005 02:11 | #17 Hooray for the Tamron.... and it's Master! Life is hard...but I just take it one photograph at a time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snapman Goldmember 1,126 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Nov 13, 2005 06:50 | #18 Well done Peachman - You're going to love using that lens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StealthLude Goldmember  3,680 posts Joined Dec 2005 More info | Dec 24, 2005 04:32 | #19 Is your tamron TACK SHARP at f/2.8??? Mine seems good, but its not SHARP SHARP... Im shooting a cell phone buttons @ 75mm from 3 feet away... [[Gear List]]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop  8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | StealthLude wrote: Is your tamron TACK SHARP at f/2.8??? Mine seems good, but its not SHARP SHARP... Im shooting a cell phone buttons @ 75mm from 3 feet away... yes using a tripod. It's going to be a little softer than say a good copy of the Canon, but it still is going to get the job done. But your picture is at ISO 800. You should do it in normal light. A chart is a better test if you really want a test. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide  20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | StealthLude wrote: Is your tamron TACK SHARP at f/2.8??? Mine seems good, but its not SHARP SHARP... Im shooting a cell phone buttons @ 75mm from 3 feet away... yes using a tripod. None of the standard range zooms are in my own experience: Sigma, Tamron, Canon. Stop it down to 5.6 or so to appreciate it. All lenses have limits and normally zooms have more of them. They need to be used with that in mind. https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PEACHMAN THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop  5,134 posts Likes: 14 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Warren, Maine,USA More info | Dec 27, 2005 18:59 | #22 3.2 for me was pretty good, but below that things fall off in sharpness pretty quickly. Although you would think it is there (the f2.8 ) for low light situations, it seems to be best as a meter for DOF used with good light at a high shutter speed...My Sigma 70-200 is twice the lens with 2.8 in low light situations... The "eyes" have it !
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2000 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
