Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 12 Nov 2005 (Saturday) 20:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which Filters to Buy?

 
Incomel
Member
Avatar
216 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Alaska
     
Nov 12, 2005 20:20 |  #1

I am hoping to buy a Canon 70-200 F/4.0 and a Canon 28-135 IS lens in the near future. I need a 67mm and 72 mm UV filter. I was wondering if there is a large difference in quality between the Canon filters and the B + W filters that would justify me spending an extra $60 for the two filters. Should I maybe buy one filter and a step up ring? Any advice would be appreciated.


"LIFE! Give my creation LIFE!"
www.studio49alaska.com (external link)

Canon 20D
24-105mm f/4 L IS; 70-200mm f/4 L; 50mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 12, 2005 20:32 |  #2

I have Canon, Hoya and B+W filters. Honestly, I don't think you'll see much difference in performance between Canon, B+W or Hoya as long as you get a good multicoated version of the filter you are looking for.

The B+W filters seem to have a better quality ring which is supposed to reduce the chance of the filter getting stuck on the lens.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kaitanium
Goldmember
Avatar
3,967 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco USA
     
Nov 12, 2005 20:37 |  #3

yes multicoated is a must. dont buy tiffen (if you ever even though of it), their build isnt as good as hoyas or b&w




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 13, 2005 06:20 |  #4

You do not really NEED to have UV filters. If you use the proper lens hoods for the lenses all the time, they will provide all the mechanical protection you need except if you are going to take photos in blowing sand, etc. In addition, the hood will protect against strong light sources outside the area of your subject from causing problems with the image quality.

A filter on a lens greatly increases the chance that you image will be degraded, especially if there are strong sources of light (including bright white clouds) anywhere that can impinge on the filter surface. The most common thing that is seen is flare, but even if that doesn't happen you're likely to get reduced colors and contrast. Just recall what it was like the last time you drove towards the sun. The sun impinging on your windshield made it more difficult to see, didn't it?

If you insist on using a filter, there are two things that I will recommend. First - get the absolute best filter you can afford (and a properly sized one for each lens). Second - use a properly designed lens hood always, even with the filter on the lens.

I'm amazed at how many amateur photographers I see carrying very expensive cameras and lenses around with a filter on the lens and either no lens hood or - worse yet - a lens hood mounted but in the reverse (storage) position.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jjonsalt
Goldmember
1,502 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
     
Nov 13, 2005 07:57 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

SkipD wrote:
You do not really NEED to have UV filters. If you use the proper lens hoods for the lenses all the time, they will provide all the mechanical protection you need except if you are going to take photos in blowing sand, etc. In addition, the hood will protect against strong light sources outside the area of your subject from causing problems with the image quality.

A filter on a lens greatly increases the chance that you image will be degraded, especially if there are strong sources of light (including bright white clouds) anywhere that can impinge on the filter surface. The most common thing that is seen is flare, but even if that doesn't happen you're likely to get reduced colors and contrast. Just recall what it was like the last time you drove towards the sun. The sun impinging on your windshield made it more difficult to see, didn't it?

If you insist on using a filter, there are two things that I will recommend. First - get the absolute best filter you can afford (and a properly sized one for each lens). Second - use a properly designed lens hood always, even with the filter on the lens.

I'm amazed at how many amateur photographers I see carrying very expensive cameras and lenses around with a filter on the lens and either no lens hood or - worse yet - a lens hood mounted but in the reverse (storage) position.

Incomel, this advice from SkipD is the best you could get. I have UV filters for my lenses to use during those rare, rare situations when it is prudent to do so. For a number of reasons I use/recommend only Heliopan or B+W brand filters.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CPALIU
Member
75 posts
Joined Sep 2005
     
Nov 13, 2005 08:38 |  #6

been using B+W and have been very happy w/ them




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Incomel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
216 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Alaska
     
Nov 14, 2005 15:14 as a reply to  @ CPALIU's post |  #7

Thanks all so much for the advice. This forum really is a great help.


"LIFE! Give my creation LIFE!"
www.studio49alaska.com (external link)

Canon 20D
24-105mm f/4 L IS; 70-200mm f/4 L; 50mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,146 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Which Filters to Buy?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1571 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.