I have been shooting landscape and other inanimate pictures for some time, but I am really wanting to improve my people pic skills. I would appreciate any feedback you might offer. Thanks!
sceee1991 Senior Member 479 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Kentucky More info | Dec 17, 2011 12:09 | #1 I have been shooting landscape and other inanimate pictures for some time, but I am really wanting to improve my people pic skills. I would appreciate any feedback you might offer. Thanks! Critique and advice are always appreciated, even when it's brutally honest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShadowontheDoor Senior Member 960 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | Dec 17, 2011 12:18 | #2 Permanent banthese really need some editing work and 2 is quite under exposed, I also don't find the composition or poses very interesting. 19 year old photographer with a 5D, and some L glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 17, 2011 12:32 | #3 Thanks for the comment Shadow. With regards to editing, is there something in particular they need? I am far from an editing expert (as you can tell), but if I have a little direction I can work toward something better. As far as #2 being "quite underexposed" - if I look at the histogram of just his face, it seems right on target to me. If I include the hair, it moves to the underexposed side. I bumped it half a stop and it looked better (I think), but just over that and the face looks hot. Is half a stop "quite underexposed" in your opinion, or am I missing something? Critique and advice are always appreciated, even when it's brutally honest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShadowontheDoor Senior Member 960 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | Dec 17, 2011 12:36 | #4 Permanent banThe histogram isn't a replacement for your own eyes, compared to the others it looks quite under exposed, and the visual component is what matters in photographs. As for my comment in editing, they just look SOOC, they have no pop, nothing to draw anyone in. 19 year old photographer with a 5D, and some L glass.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fraiseap Member 131 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Birmingham UK More info | It looks like you shot outdoors with the sun behind the camera and to the side and used fill flash. This is not a bad start. You may want to try the sun to the side and slightly behind the subject to give some rim light and use the flash to light the face (needs to be off camera though). Also, experiment with reflectors. "If I ever get satisfied, I'll have to stop. It's the frustration that drives you." - Eve Arnold
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 18, 2011 08:33 | #6 Thanks to both of you for the advice. I have made some edits, which I have moved to a new post in the right area (https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=13562727#post13562727). Critique and advice are always appreciated, even when it's brutally honest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gutterscum Goldmember More info | Dec 19, 2011 04:12 | #7 I think with a little editing the family will love them. I agree with moving so the sun is more to the side. Canon 60D gripped,70-200 2.8 IS, Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Tamron 15-55 2.8 non VG
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 895 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||