Hi all,
we just shot this wedding yesterday, this one's a little different so I'm interested to know peoples thoughts.
some more from the wedding can be seen here
-post is still a work in progress
![]() | Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE |
harroz Goldmember 2,749 posts Joined May 2008 Location: New Zealand More info | Dec 17, 2011 15:52 | #1 Hi all,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Justaddwata Goldmember 1,330 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Stralian - In Rhode IsIand More info | Dec 17, 2011 18:48 | #2 Bride is left looking a little blotchy. Proudly Australian Made!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 18, 2011 18:43 | #3 |
cupic Member 133 posts Likes: 6 Joined Aug 2010 Location: South of Sydney More info | Dec 19, 2011 00:17 | #4 Great theme but its over processed TFS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bbvdm Goldmember 1,081 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Kenmore, NY More info | Dec 19, 2011 07:56 | #5 Processing is bad. Image has lots of potential though! Canon 5D MkII gripped, Canon 7D gripped, Canon 40D gripped, Canon XTI (IR) gripped, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS, Canon 60 Macro 2.8, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS , Canon 24-105 4.0, Tokina 11-16 2.8, Canon 50mm 1.8, Sekonic L-358, Canon Speedlite 580-EX II, (2)430-EX, Pocket Wizards, lots of other stuff that seems to keep growing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 19, 2011 09:37 | #6 hate it. Louisville Kentucky Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digidiva Goldmember 2,002 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Kent, UK More info | Dec 20, 2011 10:34 | #7 bigcountry wrote in post #13567817 hate it. Subtle....Glad to see those diplomacy lessons are payin' off for ya. BUYING A CANON DOESN'T MAKE YOU A PHOTOGRAPHER, IT MAKES YOU A CANON OWNER.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
collierportraits Goldmember 1,896 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Virginia Beach, USA More info | Dec 20, 2011 11:01 | #8 a tad too HDR in my opinion. Lots of potential, though, just need to work on processing... 5D3 | 16-35L | 45 TS-E | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L | 24-70L | 70-200 II L | 580s | Zero, TT & Crumplers | and an X100!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 20, 2011 14:48 | #9 thanks all, appreciate the feedback. It's out of character for me and my style, just thought I'd try something different and see if it works. Personally I'm not into HDR's on wedding photos, they're so 'no-love', but with respect to those who do pull it off, they are an art. bigcountry wrote in post #13567817 hate it.
digidiva wrote in post #13573699 Subtle....Glad to see those diplomacy lessons are payin' off for ya. ![]()
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Dec 20, 2011 14:52 | #10 Maybe if you masked the bride so she is not so processed, and then toned down the sky just a tad from where it is.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RedTiePhotography Goldmember 3,575 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Diego More info | Dec 20, 2011 15:49 | #11 Id love to see a more simple edit of this image. Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auroraskye Goldmember 2,445 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Plano, TX More info | Dec 20, 2011 21:23 | #12 I'd love to see a clean edit of this because I personally think this is very unattractive for people and distracts from what could be a nice photo. I am super cool n' stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 20, 2011 21:24 | #13 gonzogolf wrote in post #13574923 Maybe if you masked the bride so she is not so processed, and then toned down the sky just a tad from where it is.
Ann Robinson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SchwettyLens Member 197 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Golden, Colorado More info | Dec 21, 2011 07:14 | #14 |
Dec 22, 2011 12:17 | #15 for the record...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1676 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||