Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 18 Dec 2011 (Sunday) 10:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Interesting focus problem on only one lens

 
rebop
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 99
Joined May 2005
     
Dec 18, 2011 10:34 |  #1

Hi folks,

Have an issue maybe you can help with.

I have a Canon 1D MK III and 5 L lenses. 4 of these are as sharp as I could ever want, but one has never been sharp (24-70L) and I have even exchanged it with Canon. No amount of micro adjustment makes a difference.

Yesterday I met with another photographer and did some very interesting experiments. I used his 24-70 on my body and got similar results to mine. But then used mine on TWO of his bodies and it was exactly as sharp as would be expected. So I think we can rule out it is a lens problem.

What could possibly be happening in the body that would affect only one model of lens to be soft? And I worry that adjusting the body for this lens would throw out sharpness on the others which are near perfect.

Last, the body is out of warranty. I have never been happy with the quality of work from Canon Irvine. Just not great experiences. Would you happen to know of a repair center in Northern California that is trustworthy to solve this problem on my 1D MK III?

Appreciate any insight.

~Bob


I'm Bob and I'm an L-coholic
R3 - RF 14-35
L - RF 24-70 L - RF 24-105 L - RF Thrifty-Nifty 50
RF 70-200 2.8 L - EF 70-300 L - EF 100 2.8 L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 18, 2011 10:44 |  #2

If you very carefully manually focus the 24-70 on your body, is it capable of a sharp photo? If yes, then the entire problem is AF calibration of your 24-70 matched to your 1D2. The only way to fix that is to send both to Canon and have them calibrated together.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rebop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 99
Joined May 2005
     
Dec 18, 2011 10:48 |  #3

Have not tried manual focus as I find that very difficult with the standard focus screen. I can try and report back. And Live View with low pixel screen I did not find much better for manual focus.

But I'll see what I can find today.

~Bob


I'm Bob and I'm an L-coholic
R3 - RF 14-35
L - RF 24-70 L - RF 24-105 L - RF Thrifty-Nifty 50
RF 70-200 2.8 L - EF 70-300 L - EF 100 2.8 L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rebop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 99
Joined May 2005
     
Dec 18, 2011 11:53 |  #4

OK, very interesting I cannot improve by manually focusing. In some cases, I can equal autofocus, but in many not even as sharp. Hard to judge for me when focus is as good as possible manually.

However, its still morning here so shooting at 1000 ISO. Slightly better results than yesterday, maybe because of higher shutter speeds. Still would like that extra touch of crispness I get from my 24-105 or 70-200 2.8 or that I see in others shots of 24-70's online, but close - just not that last increment of sharpness that makes you not even question if anything is amiss.

~Bob


I'm Bob and I'm an L-coholic
R3 - RF 14-35
L - RF 24-70 L - RF 24-105 L - RF Thrifty-Nifty 50
RF 70-200 2.8 L - EF 70-300 L - EF 100 2.8 L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Dec 18, 2011 12:48 |  #5

The standard focusing screen used in dSLRs is optimized for bright viewing, since some of the light is diverted from the viewfinder to the AF sensor in the bottom of the camera. The main way to increase viewfinder brightness is to make the focusing screen surface less coarse, which degrades its precision in visual focus accuracy perception. That is why accessory screens like (for 5DII) the EG-S screens are available from Canon...improves manual focus accuracy without degrading the light metering accuracy. (Most aftermarket screens improve focus accuracy while also degrading light meter accuracy.)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 18, 2011 20:20 |  #6

When you say you're not using Live View to manually focus, have you tried it at the 10x zoom/magnification? I find that quite effective on the 1D3. Sure, not as many pixels as the newer cameras, but that 10x view is pretty dang detailed.

Give that a try, but still you would benefit from having the two serviced together by Canon. Just make sure that you can get the camera to work well with your other lenses. You may need to look at using MA with some, I don't know.

If you can't MF (using Live View or a dedicated focusing screen) then I don't know what the problem may be. You said you get good results from using that other camera, so it seems like manually focusing yours should work, in case MA should work. Seriously, what other approach could you take without sending them in? I dunno!

Well, hope you get things working! It's a gread body, as you've seen with your other lenses, and the 24-70 can do really well with the 1D3! I also enjoy my 24-105 and certainly my 70-200 with it, but I'll pick up the 24-70 with it any day!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rebop
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
802 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 99
Joined May 2005
     
Dec 18, 2011 20:33 |  #7

Thanks Tony. I'm leaning that way to sending them both in, maybe even with one more lens to be sure they are fall in the sweet spot. Will try Live view once more to see. I;d like the 24-70 to be my "go to" as well and it would be on my friend's bodies :)


I'm Bob and I'm an L-coholic
R3 - RF 14-35
L - RF 24-70 L - RF 24-105 L - RF Thrifty-Nifty 50
RF 70-200 2.8 L - EF 70-300 L - EF 100 2.8 L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 18, 2011 22:28 |  #8

Well, with the Live View approach, make sure it is wide open/f/2.8. then, you will need a surface that is flat/even with the plane of focus. With the wide open aperture, something at an angle can get out of the depth of field pretty easily, and even the 1D3s center AF can be a bit off of dead center (it's not the "point" center that the 7D has). So have your detail on the plane of focus, do an AF, then you can switch into Live View do the 10x view and see if you can MF and get a better focus on the detail.

If you can, then that would make a good case for using the MA and adjusting it yourself!

If you can't, and you don't have a reasonably good sharpness, well, try Canon...

I did have an interesting discussion with a POTN member who was unhappy with his now gone copy of the 70-200 f/2.8 IS because it was a bit soft wide open compared to, say, an f/4 wide open. Of course at f/4 the f/2.8 lens was just as great as the f/4, but still, a little bit softer at f/2.8.

Well, sure, I've had chats about that with other folks. The thing is, though, I've been very happy with my 70-200 lens! I don't shoot at f/2.8 unless I need to, sure, but when I do need to the lens gets the shot!

So, "sharpness" is partly a matter of subjectivity and perception, but in your case since the lens behaves noticeably better on your friend's body and you made sure that your shots were equal in technique, subject, etc, then hopefully you will be able to nail it down to needing MA, but...who knows?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,177 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Interesting focus problem on only one lens
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1507 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.