It's already 2AM: 22nd Edition... Wait... how is it still 2AM?

KenjiS wrote in post #13728134
Yep, the f/4L IS

Sweet. It has a great balance of weight and utility.

DTBaan wrote in post #13728088
fried spam musubi with a piece of fried chicken.

yummmm!!!

themadman wrote in post #13728123
Ah, looking to get an STi eh? I would recommend a hatchback. The utility of a hatchback car is immense. After owning one (my Tc) I find it hard to go back to a car with a traditional trunk.

yeah defiantly!!! i like the look of the hatchback a lot!

well i took 30 min break to the back yard. Here was one of the favorites. Im thinking the next lens should be a 100 macro

Chet wrote in post #13727384
Though Forum wide I'm more well known for my sexy biatch tu-tu picture.

my my... you're sexy

KenjiS wrote in post #13728134
Yep, the f/4L IS

Nice. Thought you said before it was coming in this Friday. Guess Thursday is better. Nick should get his next.

this one might make you dizzy

Fricks wrote in post #13728160
well i took 30 min break to the back yard. Here was one of the favorites. Im thinking the next lens should be a 100 macro

Hmm... I find the background blur very distracting in this photo.

Jill-of-all-Trades wrote in post #13727976
Oh, and it must be blue!! Just erase those white and gold pimp mobile thoughts right out of your mind.

yeah it must be blue

themadman wrote in post #13728138
Dodge is bringing back the Dart, it is a neat looking car. Not really a car for me, but I can see it being the car for someone. I find it a bit weird the car has 4 doors, I can't imagine the rear seats being very comfortable.

From my perspective sometimes its not necessarily about using the backseats for people... its a lot easier to throw something in the back of the car if it has 4 doors vs 2 for instance.... I dont particularly care either way though..

Originally I was planning to get a nice 4th gen Trans-am WS6, But the prices rose like hell after Pontiac died, and even before then i looked at probubly 10 of them and they were all pretty much falling apart if they were priced reasonably (IE 10k or so) I decided instead I should save up and just get something new vs used...

Blurr Cube wrote in post #13728164
Nice. Thought you said before it was coming in this Friday. Guess Thursday is better. Nick should get his next.

It said Friday at first but after it shipped the tracking says it will be here tomarrow..so yeh

Not complaining!

themadman wrote in post #13728169
Hmm... I find the background blur very distracting in this photo.

I did not even immediately realize which one was in focus

themadman wrote in post #13728169
Hmm... I find the background blur very distracting in this photo.

i wonder if i went down and cut the other pink flowers... would mom be mad?

themadman wrote in post #13728139
Sweet. It has a great balance of weight and utility.

Thats my thinking, with the way my body is at the moment the f/2.8 is probably just too much for me anymore (The 100-400 was a bit hard, although that was partly due to length, not weight)

As i said in another thread, i could always add a second lens, like a 135mm f/2 or 85mm f/1.2 for when i need speed and isolation

Fricks wrote in post #13728160
well i took 30 min break to the back yard. Here was one of the favorites. Im thinking the next lens should be a 100 macro

Distracting background...yes a 100 macro would help here..

Also consider the upcoming 180 f/2.8...