Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 13 Nov 2005 (Sunday) 20:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which tripod/monopod company is better?

 
koaster
Member
84 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Nov 13, 2005 20:32 |  #1

1. Bogen/Manfrotto
2. Gitzo
3. Silk
4. Giottos
5. Velbon

I have always wondered which company would be the best, as far as build, stability, weight, etc. I know that they are many different levels of tripods/monopods, from classic, to carbon fibre. But what are reasons one would considered another brand? is it simply price (I don't know ;))?

Just wanted to see what peoples opinions were :).

Koaster




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Nov 13, 2005 20:47 |  #2

Gitzo and then manfrotto would be my two top choices.

Gitzo is better as far as finish, precision and small details go and it's more expensive. Also, they seem to market to a slightly different niche of photographers who would want a more "sophisticated" tripod.

Manfrotto on the other hand is an average workhorse which would work nicely on a movie-set for years and never wear out.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 13, 2005 21:07 |  #3

I don't think anybody can give you an answer supported by fact because each of the companies listed produce so many different types of product, each geared to different markets.

One manufacturer's model compared to a similar model by another manufacturer would be fair comparison, but trying to compare company vs company is not possible with any real meaning in the comparison.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Nov 14, 2005 07:10 |  #4

As Skip said, you really have to compare tripod to tripod. Manfrotto, Gitzo, and Giottos make a lot of comparable models. If money's no concern then Gitzo would probably win - probably, not certainly.

I would take a look at the features you want and need, pick a budget, and then compare the tripods that fit from the individual companies. You might find a feature that only Gitzo has - their Explorer model with the highly maneuvarable center column comes to mind, but I think Manfrotto makes one similar, and if you like that feature then you'd also have to consider Benbo. Just an example of one feature.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
koaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
84 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Nov 14, 2005 17:52 as a reply to  @ Scottes's post |  #5

Thanks for your replies guys.

I know what you are saying when it really comes down to is to compare each model, I just wondered if they are any major differences in each company, like does one company use a specific material, or have a function that no other company has. Just like comparing Canon CMOS sensors vs Nikon CCD sensors, both are great no doubt.

I just never could find any info on tripods so I just though I would ask a community that has vast amounts of knowledge when it comes to photography :).

I personally have a Manfrotto, and a Velbon. I am thinking of getting a monopod in the near future so just thought with the combined research that I am doing with people's opinions it would make my decision easier. Thanks again.

Koaster




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 14, 2005 17:59 as a reply to  @ koaster's post |  #6

koaster wrote:
I personally have a Manfrotto, and a Velbon. I am thinking of getting a monopod in the near future so just thought with the combined research that I am doing with people's opinions it would make my decision easier.

I am partial to Bogen/Manfrotto for tripods, monopods, and heads for both. It's just because I latched on to some extremely good stuff by them a few years ago and have always had good results with the additional items I have been buying from them.

For a relatively inexpensive but quite versatile monopod, I use the Bogen/Manfrotto 680B with a Bogen/Manfrotto 486RC2 ballhead on top. Quite a few others in the forum seem to like the same combination.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
koaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
84 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Nov 14, 2005 18:04 as a reply to  @ SkipD's post |  #7

Sounds like a good combo, I will definitely take a look at that model. Thanks Skip

Koaster




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Nov 14, 2005 22:08 |  #8

This might be an eaiser search for you if there were some particular feature you were looking for. People here might know of tripods with that feature and why one company's version is better than another. Or is there something that you like or hate about the tripods you have now? Again, it might help us narrow down or pinpoint to a tripod or three. But there are simply hundreds of tripods, and so many are well made...


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
koaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
84 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Nov 15, 2005 16:51 as a reply to  @ Scottes's post |  #9

Well for the monopod, I actually took a look at the Giottos P-Pod that Dante had opened a thread pryer to mine. From there I thought that the P-Pod was a great design (with the hidden legs). Basically I am looking for one that will support my gear, its not much but I plan on getting the 70-200 IS. So I am trying to keep that in mind, so for the Manfrotto 160 it is a good comprimise between price and functionality. I personally would like to get a P-Pod from Giottos but the price is holding me back ;).

Koaster




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricko ­ of ­ Fla
Senior Member
596 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Central Fla near Leesburg 1 hr from Orlando
     
Nov 15, 2005 17:17 |  #10

Look at the new kid on the block www.feisol.com (external link) A lot of members have purchased including me . I like mine it's small 17" and light fits in suit case.
Ricko


Smell the Roses and do not forget to shoot the Roses as you go through life. Slow down America and enjoy life :p
5 D II 20D- 300 L f4 400 L f5.6 70-200 L 2.8 24-70 L 16-35, Canon G11

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jjonsalt
Goldmember
1,502 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
     
Nov 15, 2005 18:24 as a reply to  @ Ricko of Fla's post |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

I'm a fan of Bogen/Manfrotto. Reasonable price, decent quality and the big thing for me is the way the leg sections "SNAP" to lock. I don't care for the twist collar things.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Nov 16, 2005 08:42 |  #12

Nobody beats Gitzo for stability, durability and sheer quality, except maybe Linhof or some of the outrageously expensive cine tripods. I have a couple that are over 20 years old and still as sturdy and precise as the day I bought them.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
koaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
84 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Nov 16, 2005 18:42 as a reply to  @ chtgrubbs's post |  #13

so is it more worth it to invest in a better than average monopod and not have to worry about purchasing another one? or any monopod would do (as long as it supports the weight)?

Koaster




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 16, 2005 19:09 as a reply to  @ koaster's post |  #14

koaster wrote:
so is it more worth it to invest in a better than average monopod and not have to worry about purchasing another one? or any monopod would do (as long as it supports the weight)?

I'm a firm believer in never buying junk - for photographic equipment, tools, or whatever. Whenever I have purchased the cheap alternative, I have wound up sorry at one time or another. Get the best you can afford, as long as it meets the requirements for how you want to use it. You'll be happier with your purchase.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,084 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Which tripod/monopod company is better?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1918 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.