Canon 60D Users, Unite! (3)

Dr.D wrote in post #13803832
Ugh! Someone stop me. Keep looking at the 70-200 2.8 IS MKII and finding them for about $2,000 and then keep finding MKI for around $1,600. I keep justifying the $400 difference and know I shouldn't, but if I'm going spend that much already shouldn't I be totally happy?

They aren't even the same lens, the difference is huge. Save that 400$, it's worth it.

Taken with my awesome 50L =)

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …vaphotography/6​799784245/

very nice cinema style shot...

vinmunoz wrote in post #13805024
very nice cinema style shot...

Many thanks!!

You killed the spider?

many of the reasons why i will never get rid of my 85mm f/1.8

Alex_Mk3 wrote in post #13806908
many of the reasons why i will never get rid of my 85mm f/1.8

Great shot Alex! Here's a more ''wintery'' one for you, from yesterday's shoot

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

beautiful!

85mm too? such an awesome portrait lens

Alex_Mk3 wrote in post #13806908
many of the reasons why i will never get rid of my 85mm f/1.8

Alex, really love the shot and post. Is there a specific filter you used in post to get that vintage-y feel? Love it!

Alex_Mk3 wrote in post #13806947
beautiful!

85mm too? such an awesome portrait lens

Not unless his 85 can zoom to 200...

Alright 60D fellas and ladies I need some help here. I went to rent a 24-70 today and they didn't have it so I asked about a 24-105 and it was already reserved. Then they offered to let me rent a used one they had for sale...for $599.

I was wondering what the catch was when he said the price but then I found out what the catch was...

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …erphotography/6​802529103/

if it were me i would say no. then again it takes alot to scratch a lens and when done it makes me wonder what else has happened that cannot be seen. just my 2 cents. plus id rather have a 24-70 over this lens in particular.

me say no, opt for the 24-70, you know it'll help for sports!