Canon 60D Users, Unite! (3)

Keyan wrote in post #13998918
What the 1.2L or the 1.4?

1.4 my good sir

Life is to short to grow up, have fun, laugh, enjoy the moment, cause a little trouble. Once you're gone you will never have the chance. -macroshooter1970

JLPhotography82 wrote in post #13997719
I'm working on it but i have been truly enjoying my 18-135

That's the only lens I currently have for my 60D, and I have been quite pleased with it in spite of the general disdain for that lens. Once I use ACR's or DxO's lens correction stuff on the images, they look great!

I keep my photos on SmugMug: (http://michaelnel.smug​mug.com)

JLPhotography82 wrote in post #13998984
1.4 my good sir

I'm pretty happy with mine so far, the keeper rate is pretty good. It's not quite as sharp as my 17-55 wide open, but then again, it's over a full stop faster.

Cameras: 7D2, S100
Lenses: 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, 18-135 STM, 24-70 f/4L IS USM, 50 f/1.4 USM,70-300L IS USM
Other Stuff: 430 EX II, Luma Labs Loop 3, CamRanger

Keyan wrote in post #13998932
The metal body didn't help much at all...

In fact, I bet if it were a "plastic" 60D it wouldn't have been damaged at all.

I keep my photos on SmugMug: (http://michaelnel.smug​mug.com)

michaelnel wrote in post #13999168
That's the only lens I currently have for my 60D, and I have been quite pleased with it in spite of the general disdain for that lens. Once I use ACR's or DxO's lens correction stuff on the images, they look great!

I'm usually happy with my results

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Life is to short to grow up, have fun, laugh, enjoy the moment, cause a little trouble. Once you're gone you will never have the chance. -macroshooter1970

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jaynez/67985304​08/
Best Friends Forever

5D Mark II | 6D
24-70mm F2.8L | 17-40mm F4L | Canon 85mm F1.8 USM | Elinchrom D-Lite 4 IT
Flick | Facebook

6D
flickr

Keyan wrote in post #13998932
How many of you guys saw the pics of that 5D2 that fell off of a table with a 70-200 mk II on it about a week ago? The metal body didn't help much at all...

Where?

Jaynez wrote in post #13999368

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jaynez/67985304​08/
Best Friends Forever

Nice shot! Can you show the sooc picture so we can get an idea of the pp you made?

Hi, I'm David.

Rivest wrote in post #14000110
Where?

Nice shot! Can you show the sooc picture so we can get an idea of the pp you made?

I'd like to see it as well.

(The 5D2, and the SOOC shot!)

6D
flickr

Hi, I'm David.

Rivest wrote in post #14000110
Where?

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1154022

David, meant to write about your latest set. Very nice and the floor... wow! I've been in a studio like this once (6 white sides) and the family pics we got were phenomenal!

Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

Keyan wrote in post #13998932
The 60D doesn't feel plasticy. The toys in the dollar bin feel plasticy. Whatever the 60D is made of (I've heard glass reinforced polycarbonate), it's super high quality and the thing feels rock solid. How many of you guys saw the pics of that 5D2 that fell off of a table with a 70-200 mk II on it about a week ago? The metal body didn't help much at all...

Exactly. That's not the first picture I've seen of a cracked magnesium body. Using magnesium may be "sexier" and more expensive, but the shell is very thin and magnesium is much more brittle than polycarbonate. I think a magnesium shell gives buyers of higher end cameras, and the people who review those cameras, the illusion of higher quality and robustness to justify the significantly higher cost.

Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

Thanks Makis. But sadly, my studio isn't as great as it looks like

Messy BTS shot:

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

An extra from the same shoot (sorry to those who are bored from her):

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Hi, I'm David.

JLPhotography82 wrote in post #13998984
1.4 my good sir

Sorry if I confused the issue with my quip about getting the 1.2L.

Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3

Rivest wrote in post #14000275
Thanks Makis. But sadly, my studio isn't as great as it looks like

Messy BTS shot:

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

An extra from the same shoot (sorry to those who are bored from her):

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Yeah, she's really boring.

Mark
Nikon Z fc, Nikkor Z 16-50mm, Nikkor Z 40mm f/2, Nikkor Z 28mm f/2.8 (SE), Nikkor Z DX 18-140mm, Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2, Voigtlander 23mm f/1.2, DXO PhotoLab 5 Elite, DXO FilmPack 6 Elite, DXO ViewPoint 3