I still can't believe that there are professional video cameras out there that still only record audio at 16bit! Sony F900R... Panasonic HDX-900... and on and on.
ChasWG Goldmember 3,640 posts Likes: 13 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Aurora, CO More info | Jan 03, 2012 17:26 | #16 I still can't believe that there are professional video cameras out there that still only record audio at 16bit! Sony F900R... Panasonic HDX-900... and on and on. Chas Gordon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Jan 03, 2012 17:33 | #17 ChasWG wrote in post #13641467 I still can't believe that there are professional video cameras out there that still only record audio at 16bit! Sony F900R... Panasonic HDX-900... and on and on. Yea that is pretty silly, but they know they can get away with it because people will still buy the camera knowing it is what it is and that audio will be captured off camera anyway by a much more professional sound setup. Not to mention both of those cameras, while still out and about, are both aged and being replaced by newer technology. I mean the Sony F900R isnt even a 4:4:4 color space and the Panasonic is tape and 720P. Now a days it seems if you arent shooting film, people are shooting high end digital in 4:4:4 and 4K+. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasWG Goldmember 3,640 posts Likes: 13 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Aurora, CO More info | Jan 03, 2012 18:06 | #18 In the day to day production world both those cameras are still heavily used. Many shows shoot exclusively on the HDX-900 and sound is still captured directly at the camera. Chas Gordon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 03, 2012 18:16 | #19 Going with what Chas said earlier, would a 70-200f4L do the trick too? Most of these shots are going to be in an open area where I can control how close or how far I need to be. YouTube Tutorials-https://www.youtube.com/user/MQuilesPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasWG Goldmember 3,640 posts Likes: 13 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Aurora, CO More info | Jan 03, 2012 18:39 | #20 I use my 70-200 f4L all the time. As long as you have enough light, it's a great lens that doesn't cost too much! Having IS on it would be killer if you can afford it, otherwise the non-IS version is just fine. Chas Gordon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1218 guests, 161 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||