I'm looking at adding a filter on my 28-135 kit lens with the only reason being dust protection etc. Should I just go with a clear filter instead of a UV? I was looking at the B&W and they offer both in their better quality line.
Thank you.
QuackMeUp Senior Member 262 posts Likes: 16 Joined Nov 2011 Location: Rogers, MN More info | Dec 31, 2011 14:26 | #1 I'm looking at adding a filter on my 28-135 kit lens with the only reason being dust protection etc. Should I just go with a clear filter instead of a UV? I was looking at the B&W and they offer both in their better quality line.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | Dec 31, 2011 16:24 | #2 UV filters are in the same league and "filming" on DSLR. Old technology which is not related to DSLR anymore. M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
svarley Senior Member 592 posts Likes: 13 Joined Mar 2009 Location: LA, CA More info | Dec 31, 2011 16:56 | #3 It's probably not worth adding a filter - just clean your lens element - they're usually a lot sturdier than any coated filters anyway.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Dec 31, 2011 17:00 | #4 Quack Me Up wrote in post #13625981 I'm looking at adding a filter on my 28-135 kit lens with the only reason being dust protection etc. Should I just go with a clear filter instead of a UV? I was looking at the B&W and they offer both in their better quality line. Thank you. i usually use UV but clear would be fine too. make sure the filter is multi-coated. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
djohnfot Member 174 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Oregon More info | Jan 01, 2012 17:47 | #6 If you must use a filter to protect the front element then, by all means, use a good one that's coated and optically flat. They aren't cheap but are a good deal compared to a cheap filter that just handicaps an otherwise good lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sandpiper Cream of the Crop More info | Personally, I wouldn't put one on it. But to answer your question, go with the clear if it is cheaper than the equivalent UV, as UV is pointless on DSLRs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fiftyD Member 75 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | Jan 01, 2012 18:28 | #8 Quack Me Up wrote in post #13625981 I'm looking at adding a filter on my 28-135 kit lens with the only reason being dust protection etc. Should I just go with a clear filter instead of a UV? I was looking at the B&W and they offer both in their better quality line. Thank you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1507 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||